Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #260

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #194

See

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #193

See Changes: [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-5505: Fixed issue in getting interface number in IpAssocVpcCommand -

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #259

See Changes: [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack [jayapal] Fixed issue in getting interface number in IpAssocVpcCommand -- [...truncated 3844 lines...] [WA

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #259

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Re: Review Request 16319: CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16319/#review30607 --- Commit 8354f33e33d4e6d917d563dc9f82410c1ed86704 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16319: CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16319/#review30606 --- Commit 55237f8b15a1f1efc6c7f2b7252459cfbb40b994 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16319: CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16319/#review30605 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Dec. 17, 2013, 9:19 a.m., H

Re: cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?

I'll look at it, but that util method that loads the log4j-cloud.xml is still being called, I can't remember the api off the top of my head. My first guess would actually be that the file is getting loaded from a different place than /etc. ACS packages a lot of files twice and I often see the

Re: cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?

I just tried on my desktop and it works. LogUtils from ACS just calls DOMConfigurator.configureAndWatch() which spawns a thread called Filewatchdog. It just sleep for 60 seconds and then checks the modified time on the log4j-cloud.xml. I haven't tested on a really production setup though. Can y

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+1 Validated from the specified commit id. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 December 2013 19:19 To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the

RE: cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?

Darren, Iirc, all I did was make a thread available to log4j to monitor the config file that it had loaded. I checked the open file handles with Sheng and couldn't find any open file handles to any log4j-cloud.xml, which if this was done, will always have an open file handle. --Alex > ---

Re: cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?

Cc'ing dev list from the right email Darren > On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:14 PM, "Darren Shepherd" > wrote: > > I'll look at it, but that util method that loads the log4j-cloud.xml is still > being called, I can't remember the api off the top of my head. > > My first guess would actually be that

Re: kvm - why just qcow2

I've been using the systemvm VHD to test that format on my KVM template patch, launching it as a user vm. I guess this means we may be able to get away with not generating the qcow2 template anymore if we wish. I haven't tested the system vm install script against it yet, though. On Tue, Dec 17, 2

Re: Review Request 15902: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

> On Dec. 16, 2013, 6:51 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/api/query/QueryManagerImpl.java, line 2857 > > > > > > Should this be findByIdIncludingRemoved as well ? See bug 5221 as per > > the comment

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #192

See Changes: [nitin.mehta] CLOUDSTACK-4941: -- [...truncated 5697 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #191

See -- [...truncated 5641 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean)

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #258

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #258

See Changes: [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-5534: MySQL exception raised when searching for users with -- [...truncated 3844 lines...] [WARNING] Invalid POM for org.apache.ws.security:wss4j:jar:1.5.10, t

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #190

See Changes: [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-5534: MySQL exception raised when searching for users with [kelveny] CLOUDSTACK-669: convert volume attach/detach flows to make them be serialized with other VM operations -

Review Request 16337: [CLOUDSTACK-5526] Fix LibvirtDomainXMLParser error when diskCacheMode is empty string

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16337/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5526

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #257

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #257

See

RE: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO

Koushik, My comments inline. Prachi -Original Message- From: Koushik Das Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:06 AM To: Prachi Damle; Subject: Re: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO Thanks Prachi. I was looking at CLOUDSTACK-5458 when I came across this. I don't quite follow the logic of multi

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #189

See Changes: [sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5533: Disable VR's DNS functionality if user choose to use external dns -- [...truncated 5638 lines...] [INFO] -

RE: Tomcat Version

It built fine with .37 - Didn't know if there were any specific dependencies. Regards, Alex Hitchins -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: 18 December 2013 00:04 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat Version I don't know of anything in

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #256

See Changes: [sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5533: Disable VR's DNS functionality if user choose to use external dns -- [...truncated 3844 lines...] [WARNING] Invalid POM for org.apache.ws.security:wss

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #256

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #188

See Changes: [brian.federle] CLOUDSTACK-5476: Fix missing settings tab on zone details -- [...truncated 5638 lines...] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #255

See Changes: [brian.federle] CLOUDSTACK-5476: Fix missing settings tab on zone details -- [...truncated 3844 lines...] [WARNING] Invalid POM for org.apache.ws.security:wss4j:jar:1.5.10, transiti

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #255

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

RE: Tomcat Version

I don't know of anything in Cloudstack that requires 6.0.32. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Alex Hitchins [mailto:alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 3:32 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Tomcat Version > > Is 6.0.32 the only version that wil

cloudstack no longer monitoring log4j-cloud.xml?

Hey Darren, I've just been alerted that cloudstack doesn't seem to be dynamically loading the log4j configurations any more. This means you need to restart the server every time someone changes the logging level. This was done by the componentlocator previously. Was this lost during the spri

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #254

See Changes: [alex.huang] reverted 3a3fec3cb6bb4f9a008370ea02279d286654b01a because it fails a unit test -- [...truncated 3844 lines...] [WARNING] Invalid POM for org.apache.ws.security:wss4j:j

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #254

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #253

See Changes: [prachi] CLOUDSTACK-4852: Since upgrade to 4.2 only users at the zone-attached domain level can manipulate VMs [prachi] CLOUDSTACK-4852: Since upgrade to 4.2 only users at the zone-attached domain level can manipulate V

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #253

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

revert....please redo...

Kishan, I reverted 3a3fec3cb6bb4f9a008370ea02279d286654b01a because it fails unit test. Please make sure unit tests pass before committing your changes. --Alex

Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

+1 2013/12/17 Abhinandan Prateek > The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate > the previous RC did not get pushed to repo. > > Following are the particulars to vote for this time around: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=r

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #252

See Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5486: UI > tags > listXXX API now returns tags property. So, use tags property in embedded object returned by listXXX API to populate tags in detailView in all pages (instead of calling e

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack Console Proxy - RDP Client #252

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #252

See -- [INFO] [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #187

See Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-5486: UI > tags > listXXX API now returns tags property. So, use tags property in embedded object returned by listXXX API to populate tags in detailView in all pag

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #185

See Changes: [brian.federle] CLOUDSTACK-5532: Tag UI: Truncate long tag key/value -- [...truncated 51880 lines...] 963/1332 KB 967/1332 KB 971/1332 KB 975/1332 K

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #186

See Changes: [prachi] CLOUDSTACK-4852: Since upgrade to 4.2 only users at the zone-attached domain level can manipulate VMs -- [...truncated 5637 lines...] [INFO] --

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Image S3 #251

See

RE: kvm - why just qcow2

It makes sense to. I think we started with vmdk and is now using ova. If so, whoever did the change just didn't rename the file. Would have been better to just add a new processor when that change was done... --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmai

Re: Entity UUID and Type missing on ActionEvent event notifications

Murali, Another thing I wanted to mention along the same lines is that ActionEvents issued for resources in a project, don't have a project ID.  They have an account ID, but it's the UUID for the project account ID, instead of the project ID.  This is not that useful as you can't use that accou

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.2 to 2b34dc5

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > The problem is that while you are verifying the build and someone > pushes some code your commit ids will change on a rebase. let the build be based on a commit and create the branch on that. Then other commits won't hurt. The rebase b

Re: kvm - why just qcow2

1) Would it be OK to move VmdkProcessor to OVAProcessor, so we can use VmdkProcessor for native .vmdk files? 2) I also noticed in my testing that .ova is the one format so far that doesn't work out of the box with minor code changes for KVM, and it seems to be due to the fact that VmdkProcessor un

Review Request 16324: CLOUDSTACK-4780: Changes related to checking snapshot on NFS server

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16324/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

RE: Synchronizing projects across regions

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2013 3:12 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Synchronizing projects across regions > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bill Jones wrote: > > Ok, so given that there w

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.2 to 2b34dc5

+1 to creation of a branch on cutting first RC, this will require update to the release procedure doc that I followed. This can save some trouble. Also we can have the build_asf do a git push, of the versioning commits generated by it, automatically if it is not a dry run. The problem is that while

[VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate the previous RC did not get pushed to repo. Following are the particulars to vote for this time around: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 commit: 1b2b58fe352a19aee1721bd79b

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/#review30529 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Dec. 17, 2013, 11:58 a.m., bh

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/#review30528 --- Commit 9118bbf934292d0c95b04e9dff0b2f9a29251b80 in branch refs/heads

Re: VMEntityVO and VMInstanceVO

Thanks Prachi. I was looking at CLOUDSTACK-5458 when I came across this. I don't quite follow the logic of multiple VOs based on a subset of fields. If multiple VOs are targeting a subset of fields for the same row in the db. then that essentially means that the fields in each subset must be ind

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 11:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik D

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.2 to 2b34dc5

is it neccessary to work with a revert? How about creating a (mini-)branch next time? This would obsolete my request for a tag on the RC as it is in fact. UIt will also make it easier to implement fixes that have to do with release instead of functionality. regards, On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:42

Tomcat Version

Is 6.0.32 the only version that will work - or can I use 6.0.37 which is the latest? Alex Hitchins This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the auth

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 11:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik D

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-5526) LibvirtDomainXMLParser

I think Wido already fixed this issue in the following commit https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=088247b61b4ecea7bb757becd233e10c97a7a75a 2013/12/17 howie yu (JIRA) > howie yu created CLOUDSTACK-5526: > > > Summa

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 10:25 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik D

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/#review30526 --- engine/api/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManager.java

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #248

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge #248

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack #248

See

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 9:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: Review Request 16315: CLOUDSTACK-5495 Unable to stop VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16315/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2013, 9:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Review Request 16319: CLOUDSTACK-5507: Unable to add XenServer 5.6 host to cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16319/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5507 http

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack #247

See -- maven31-agent.jar already up to date maven31-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar already up to date <===[JENKINS REMOTING CAPACITY]=

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #247

See Changes: [Devdeep Singh] CLOUDSTACK-5489: Query the user name and add it to the command while mounting a cifs share. -- [...truncated 77 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervis

Re: [DISCUSS](CLOUDSTACK-3471)Provide an API to extract the log statements of a given jobid

Hi Chiradeep, Appreciate your feedback. Sure I am ok with creating and running a seperate service. Just to ensure that I got you correctly, so you are saying that the "LogSearchAsAservice" would be queried when required to search for log messages related to a jobid and a seperate API is not called