Re: Review Request 15454: CLOUDSTACK-5147: Removing basic and sg tag from the test case which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15454/#review28794 --- Commit 1aec43370faf626348897489ec3d32a315cd32f4 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15454: CLOUDSTACK-5147: Removing basic and sg tag from the test case which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15454/#review28792 --- Commit c2ea4fc3c7a880a2dedd9b21e7a8dca287557b39 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15454: CLOUDSTACK-5147: Removing basic and sg tag from the test case which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15454/#review28793 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On Nov. 12, 2013, 1:39 p.m.

Re: Review Request 15454: CLOUDSTACK-5147: Removing basic and sg tag from the test case which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15454/#review28791 --- Commit c6195c355643a0768a805491079ba9727ae44a00 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15453: CLOUDSTACK-5146: Removed tags basic and sg from test case TestRouterRestart.test_01_restart_network_cleanup which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15453/#review28790 --- Commit 967a5bded4b34c3e92a3860f79980d5ebe4c14e0 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15453: CLOUDSTACK-5146: Removed tags basic and sg from test case TestRouterRestart.test_01_restart_network_cleanup which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15453/#review28789 --- Commit b894a3820ce48d777631cffb0610040c97ffafce in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15453: CLOUDSTACK-5146: Removed tags basic and sg from test case TestRouterRestart.test_01_restart_network_cleanup which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15453/#review28788 --- Commit 5deefb1ec56a0d96a7c4a850a6d2943bb337e1ee in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15453: CLOUDSTACK-5146: Removed tags basic and sg from test case TestRouterRestart.test_01_restart_network_cleanup which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15453/#review28787 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On Nov. 12, 2013, 1:09 p.m.

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#review28786 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Nov. 13, 2013, 5:35 a.m., bha

Re: Review Request 13841: Missing tests from QA repo to ASF - 3 tests from test_vmware_drs.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/#review28783 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On Oct. 30, 2013, 7:01 a.m.

Re: Review Request 14058: Including tests for VPC VM Lifecycle on Tagged hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14058/#review28782 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Girish Shilamkar On Nov. 8, 2013, 1:48 p.m.,

Re: CloudStack.next

I don't see any sugestions I don't like (including not breaking api) but, - I like to second Simnons 'HA for VPC routers' extra. It is hurting not having that. - smaller releases is another one. monthly preferably or maybe an db upgrade model that allows for running snapshots and upgrading them r

Re: [Doc] Volunteers for Completing 4.2.1 Upgrade Section

is it an idea to cross post this to users? it sounds like something more experienced people are mostly found on that list for. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for volunteers to help complete the Upgrade section in the RN. > > The current section

Re: CloudStack.next

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:41:17PM +, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi All, > > As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I > thought it would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list > before Collab next week. > > What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudSta

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/ --- (Updated Nov. 13, 2013, 5:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

CloudStack Mini-Conference@Open Source India Conference 2013

Hi, CloudStack Bangalore community is presenting at Open Source India (OSI)Conference 2013, today. The agenda is: CloudStack for Beginners , by Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist, InMobi Hacking CloudStack with DevCloud, by Rajesh Battala, Apache CloudStack Committer and Hacker The deta

RE: uploading to maven repository

Hi Alex, One of the reasons we have a copy of the java bindings is because cloudstack makes a customization to set the connection timeout. Will these customizations be kept when the stubs are uploaded to maven? Regarding, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@c

[Doc] Volunteers for Completing 4.2.1 Upgrade Section

Hi, I am looking for volunteers to help complete the Upgrade section in the RN. The current section is completely a mess, and I do not have the environments to do justice to the task. Thanks in advance for the help -Radhika

Re: resource count table in 4.2, primary_storage

Thanks for the hint. In the mean time I've manually fixed the db for the test environment we upgraded. I'll make sure we have those fixes going forward. On Nov 12, 2013 5:33 PM, "Nitin Mehta" wrote: > I guess you are referring to the bug > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4716 > >

Re: CloudStack.next

As a CloudStack user, here are the ares that I feel need attention: - improved IAM and implementation of a full RBAC security model. This is hurting us right now. - improved VM import functionality (ie bulk import of VM's and import of running VM's from existing vSphere clusters) - improved backup

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

On 13/11/13 4:11 am, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> >> The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the >>gpg output. >> >> See this: >> >> localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack >gpg --print-md MD5 >>apache-cloudsta

RE: [ACS4.2.1] Release readiness

-Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:28 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS4.2.1] Release readiness > > > >> >> While I was doing a dry run of building a RC and waiting on closure >>of last

Re: resource count table in 4.2, primary_storage

I guess you are referring to the bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4716 On 12/11/13 3:57 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >I'm wondering if someone can quickly help me figure out an issue with >4.1 to 4.2 upgrade. I seem to be missing a bunch of types on existing >accounts for my

Re: CloudStack.next

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Steve Wilson wrote: > Hi All, > > As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I thought it > would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list before Collab next > week. > > What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudStack? Cal

Re: CloudStack.next

Steve, I would like to see better error messages in the gui. Some errors that I get are absolutely meaningless and don't tell anything about what needs doing to overcome the errors. This is very important in my opinion. Errors like Could not start vm or router due to Null is just no go. I've a

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Good point, Chiradeep, I'm not sure if you reviewed my design doc in the wiki, but my design is to just skip any actions for target resources that already took place by any means. But the issue is when conflict actions in the same resources (like create & delete the same users) are enqueued in rev

resource count table in 4.2, primary_storage

I'm wondering if someone can quickly help me figure out an issue with 4.1 to 4.2 upgrade. I seem to be missing a bunch of types on existing accounts for my resource_count table. In particular, I'm missing rows for pre-4.2 accounts for resource types: cpu memory primary_storage secondary_storage D

CloudStack.next

Hi All, As we ramp towards freeze on 4.3 and start talking about 4.4, I thought it would be fun to queue up a discussion here on the list before Collab next week. What do you envision in the next MAJOR release of CloudStack? Call it 5.0 or whatever you like, but what would you like to see ther

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:47PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > The format of apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2.md5 doesn't match the gpg > output. > > See this: > > localhost :: /tmp/cloudstack >gpg --print-md MD5 > apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.tar.bz2 > apache-cloudstack-4.2.1-src.t

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

-Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:34 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > >This vote is to

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

Thanks a lot for your confirmation, Marcus. I'll create a review request unless anyone has an objection. Thanks Alex Ough On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I have done parallel KVM migrations without issue, it's "supposed to > work". Really I think it's in the same boat

Re: A question on vm migrations when hosts are set into a maintenance mode.

I have done parallel KVM migrations without issue, it's "supposed to work". Really I think it's in the same boat as parallel start/stop. It should work, but the config option is there just in case. I think we should add it. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03,

Re: SSL and JCE

OpenJDK 6: working ok OpenJDK 7: working ok Oracle JDK 6: JCE install required Oracle JDK 7: ? - did those jce policy files work for anyone in oracle jdk 1.7? I believe it is not really user-friendly, but acceptable both from legal (not a lawyer) and usability perspective if we tell the system ad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

The URL should be https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 We don't branch for bug-fix releases. They stay in the feature release branch but are tagged. Looks like the URL above is updated to reflect 4.2.1. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Simon Well

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

The "list of changes" URL is returning a 404. It doesn't look like this has been branched yet. From: Chip Childers Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:40 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1 On Tue, Nov 12

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:33:51PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > > >This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance > > release. > > For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:52:54PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > >This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance release. > For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart from > regression tests and BVTs. > Around 175 bugs have been fixed som

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

Go ahead Chiradeep, please cc me (and Nguyen), Am I on for tomorrow afternoons meeting? regards, Daan On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > There's also NFVI - Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure > > On 11/12/13 11:26 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >>Well, i

Re: Eclipse Question

Hi Alex, Thanks for the reply. What I typically do after there have been a lot of changes to the repo is I remove every CloudStack project I have from Eclipse, then I re-import them and let them re-build. I was surprised after this process to see such weird error messages because, as you say, th

Re: Review Request 15418: Fixes about: Code quality, checkstyle and cloudstack conventions

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15418/ --- (Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 7:47 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

There's also NFVI - Network Functions Virtualization Infrastructure On 11/12/13 11:26 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Well, i just learned something and someone sure loves confusion through >acronyms > >-Sebastien > >On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:28, Chiradeep Vittal >wrote: > >> VNF = virtualized net

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

Missed this one. In a single region, the CloudStack DB is the master for most operations. If the infra is not in the state the DB says it should be, generally the approach is to whack it and make it conform. For some exceptions (live migration/related use cases are exceptions) the DB is the slave -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

Well, i just learned something and someone sure loves confusion through acronyms -Sebastien On 12 Nov 2013, at 19:28, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > VNF = virtualized network function (e.g., LB virtual appliance) > NFV = network functions virtualization (the whole kit and caboodle) > > On 11/12/13

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#review28745 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

VNF = virtualized network function (e.g., LB virtual appliance) NFV = network functions virtualization (the whole kit and caboodle) On 11/12/13 6:53 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: > >On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > >> OK, here's the draft of the Liaison request (template borrowed f

Re: SSL and JCE

Yes, the _content_ of the jar files are different. It is kind of misleading. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I had the two JAR files in my /jre/lib/security, as well, and > the tests were failing. When I replaced them with the ones I downl

RE: Eclipse Question

Usually problems like that goes away if you refresh your project or do a clean on the project. Eclipse just get confused. I never know which one helps for sure but when this gets really bad, these are the steps I do. Project->Turn off Build Automatically Project->Clean Highlight all projects ->

Re: SRX inline with VR

Hi Geoff, Yes, VR cannot be used as LB only on its own, and it cannot be used for SRX as LB service(because in this mode, we would want to only enable LB on the VR). --Sheng On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi Sheng, > > Thanks fo

Re: Regarding the ssl key store change

Hi Wei, The original logic is, is the user don't want to generate sslkeystore, we would use the default keystore; otherwise we would use the user generated one. The reason is, in the deployment environment, each user should have it's own ssl keystore; but for developer, it just doesn't matter, bu

Re: Eclipse Question

"mouseClicked(MouseEvent) must override MouseClicked(MouseEvent)" I meant for the second mouseClicked in that line to start with a lower-case 'm' by the way. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I fetched and rebased on top of master

Eclipse Question

Hi, I fetched and rebased on top of master yesterday and noticed in Eclipse that I now have 61 error messages. Many of them are related to @Override, but I am not sure why Eclipse is complaining. For example: package common; import java.awt.event.MouseEvent; import java.awt.event.MouseListener

Re: Cloudstack not aware that a host disconnected and it's VMs died.

Thanks. That'd work ... the other option that works is removing the host (now in a disconnected state) form the pod. I'd like to try this on 4.2 .. Thanks On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:27 AM, BJO ERN wrote: > I believe this was fixed in 4.1 or newer. Saw some info flying around month > ago. > I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

I'll do it since I actually know some of the folks On 11/12/13 8:43 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Ok, > >when nothing there is nothing else to add I will send out this >tonight. Unless you want to make the contact yourself, Chiradeep. > >I'll put you and Nguyen in cc > >Daan > >On Tue, Nov 12, 201

Re: Cloudstack not aware that a host disconnected and it's VMs died.

I believe this was fixed in 4.1 or newer. Saw some info flying around month ago. I would update the DB accordingly and manipulate the VM state Bjoern On Nov 12, 2013 9:23 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote: > Hi List. > > I have a simple problem and i wonder if there is any setting to change this > beh

Cloudstack not aware that a host disconnected and it's VMs died.

Hi List. I have a simple problem and i wonder if there is any setting to change this behavior. I'm using cstack 4.0.2 , and when a host dies cloustack does not seem to realize that its virtual machines aren't there any longer (I'm using local storage so there's no HA involved) I've waited for 30

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

Ok, when nothing there is nothing else to add I will send out this tonight. Unless you want to make the contact yourself, Chiradeep. I'll put you and Nguyen in cc Daan On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > 2013/11/12 Chip Childers > >> Tuna - we can find a way to get you eng

Re: uploading to maven repository

hi, Amazing!!! Let me know of you need any help. Kind Regards, Onuonga Frankie. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey Alex, > > That is indeed the right step to take. > > If you need any help with this let me know. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 12 nov. 2013, at 17:04, Al

Re: uploading to maven repository

Hey Alex, That is indeed the right step to take. If you need any help with this let me know. Cheers, Hugo On 12 nov. 2013, at 17:04, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a chance to convince xenserver to upload their java stubs to maven so > that we don't have to keep a copy of it in ou

Re: Question: Error when creating templates from ROOT volumes in the Simulator

Ok, thanks Prasanna.  I'm going to create a bug in Jira so we can keep track of the changes (when/if they are needed). --  David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On November 7, 2013 at 3:02:09 PM, David Griz

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

2013/11/12 Chip Childers > Tuna - we can find a way to get you engaged as well! No prob, Chip. I'm glad for any contribution I can do... -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U

uploading to maven repository

Hi all, I have a chance to convince xenserver to upload their java stubs to maven so that we don't have to keep a copy of it in ours source code. They're stuck on the whole upload process as they've never dealt with maven before. Is there anyone who can walk me through how to do it? Reading

Re: SSL and JCE

The test don't do anything fancy with encryption. They just create a command object and pass it to the certificate service which does certificate validation. If the tests are failing because of a JCE dependency, the management server should also fail when those commands are sent over the API. S

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

This vote is to approve the current RC build for 4.2.1 maintenance release. For this particular release various upgrade paths have been tested apart from regression tests and BVTs. Around 175 bugs have been fixed some new features added (see CHANGES). Following are the particulars for this re

Review Request 15455: Fixing all Coverity bugs on file Upgrade2214to30 related to resource leak. Now the statements closed and nullified before a new assignment.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15455/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cloudstack-git

Before 4.2.1 release translate your CS localization

Hello, Before the 4.2.1 release, don't hesitate to translate your CS localization (4.2.xmessages.properties). https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/CloudStack_UI/ French is 100% translated Japanese : 99% Chinese (China) : 98% Korean (Korea) : 96% Portuguese (Brazil) : 96% Russian (Russia) 94%

Re: SSL and JCE

I had the two JAR files in my /jre/lib/security, as well, and the tests were failing. When I replaced them with the ones I downloaded from Oracle, the tests passed. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Koushik Das wrote: > I see the JCE extensions in jdk 1.7 as well. They are present under > /jre/l

Re: Need access to Jira

Looks like I really dont need any additional permission to update comments. Have been able to update Jira. Thank you. Saurav On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Saurav Lahiri wrote: > Hi, > Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would > like to share a couple of screen

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > OK, here's the draft of the Liaison request (template borrowed from > OpenDaylight) > > -- > > > To: > ETSI Industry Study Group (ISG) on Network Functions Virtualization > Prod

Re: [ASF4.2.1] GPG keys

Email it to me directly, and I'll add it to our KEYS file. -chip On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:59:15AM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > I have uploaded my gpg keys as requested. Can anyone help in adding these > to Apache Server ? > > > -abhi > > On 06/11/13 8:35 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" > wro

Re: SSL and JCE

IMO - having this as a requirement for a build is a bit of an issue. First, we can't distribute it (obviously). Second, it's a bit of an esoteric requirement if you are using a JDK that doesn't include it automatically. This will lead to confusion. Is there a way that we can re-work the tests to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

Looks good to me. I'd suggest that Daan send it, since he's a PMC member. Tuna - we can find a way to get you engaged as well! -chip On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 06:21:54AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > OK, here's the draft of the Liaison request (template borrowed from > OpenDaylight) > > -

Need access to Jira

Hi, Can someone please grant me permission to add comments to Jira. I would like to share a couple of screen shots and api output for cloudstack-1889. Thanks Saurav

Review Request 15454: CLOUDSTACK-5147: Removing basic and sg tag from the test case which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15454/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: [ACS4.2.1] Release readiness

Since, I have not heard from anyone about any major concern I will go ahead and build a RC. -abhi On 12/11/13 12:43 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: > >While I was doing a dry run of building a RC and waiting on closure of >last remaining critical issues, would like to know if there are any >par

Review Request 15453: CLOUDSTACK-5146: Removed tags basic and sg from test case TestRouterRestart.test_01_restart_network_cleanup which should not be run on basic zone setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15453/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15344: Enabling DB HA for cloud stack data bases using mysql active-active solution

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344/ --- (Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 12:43 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 is successful

We tested on Xenserver, there are were some missteps initially. Will see if things are not clear in upgrade docs and rectify. On 12/11/13 4:07 pm, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >I tested KVM. > >2013/11/12 sebgoa > >> Wei and Abhi, >> >> Can you check the 4.2.0 release notes and go through the upgrade >>

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/ --- (Updated Nov. 12, 2013, 12:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meh

[ASF4.2.1] GPG keys

I have uploaded my gpg keys as requested. Can anyone help in adding these to Apache Server ? -abhi On 06/11/13 8:35 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >Here is the link to public key on gpg.mit.edu >http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0xF98C >8 >4C242443AA1 > >-abh

RE: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

Marcus, Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5145 to fix ACL listing of all users. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013 5:20 AM > To: Alena Prokharchyk > Cc: Kishan Kavala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 is successful

I tested KVM. 2013/11/12 sebgoa > Wei and Abhi, > > Can you check the 4.2.0 release notes and go through the upgrade > instructions. > I know there was some missing steps, we should correct those for 4.2.1 > > The docs have moved to: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-docs.git

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 is successful

Wei and Abhi, Can you check the 4.2.0 release notes and go through the upgrade instructions. I know there was some missing steps, we should correct those for 4.2.1 The docs have moved to: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-docs.git Also if you can mention which OS/Hypervisor comb

Re: Review Request 15451: Compute offering should not shown in disk offering section

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15451/#review28726 --- Ship it! master 5e14e1692d3f31fccff14d66f0fa1a910398a3f8 4.3 c91083

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 is successful

The upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 succeed in our environment as well. As we discussed before, maybe it is better to ask users upgrade from previous versions to a specified version (like 4.2.1), then upgrade to newer versions (4.3/5.0). 2013/11/12 Abhinandan Prateek > Oops, fixed the subject. > >

Re: [ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 is successful

Oops, fixed the subject. On 12/11/13 3:00 pm, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >For benefit of others I am forwarding email from Amin who has >successfully tested upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1. > >-abhi > >On 12/11/13 12:47 pm, "Amin Samir" >mailto:aminsamira...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > >Hi Abhi, > >I j

[JENKINS] Issues resolved

Heya, The builds were stuck because the system ran out of diskspace. Cleaned some of the unused job folders to get some space back. Cheers, Hugo

[ASF4.2.1] Upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2 fails

For benefit of others I am forwarding email from Amin who has successfully tested upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1. -abhi On 12/11/13 12:47 pm, "Amin Samir" mailto:aminsamira...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hi Abhi, I just succeeded in upgrading from 2.2.14 to 4.2, my environment used to be virtualized

Re: [ACS4.2.1] Release readiness

> > > >> >> While I was doing a dry run of building a RC and waiting on closure of >>last remaining critical issues, would like to know if there are any >>particular concerns about release readiness. >> For one the upgrade path from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 is in works. >> >> Any other issues please pop u

Review Request 15451: Compute offering should not shown in disk offering section

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15451/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5063 http

Re: [ACS4.2.1] Release readiness

On Nov 12, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > While I was doing a dry run of building a RC and waiting on closure of last > remaining critical issues, would like to know if there are any particular > concerns about release readiness. > For one the upgrade path from 2.2.14 to 4.2

[DISCUSS] Specific information for hypervisor

Hi all, I write this e-mail to start (or restart) a discussion on the following topic : How to send specific information to an hypervisor when we would like to be generic from the CloudStack Management Server (or from the WS API) ? e.g : Could be able to choose pci for Xen, etc. https://issues.a