Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

We are already (generally) AP for most infra changes really. I'd use that model. Eventual consistency is better in this scenario. > On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > I'd also like to highlight that it isn't a trivial problem. > Let's say there's 3 regions: this means t

Re: Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/#review28602 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java

Regarding the ssl key store change

Hi Wei, I found this change in the MASTER. commit 57ba367f3c985e80ea1b34267e298b481a353298 Author: Wei Zhou Date: Thu Nov 7 11:09:06 2013 +0100 CLOUDSTACK-5042: change cloud.keystore to cloudmanagementserver.keystore and install it (cherry picked from commit de448ec4792eda5b47d79b26e9cb8c

RE: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze today 11/08

Folks one final reminder I will cut the 4.3 branch tomorrow morning. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:58 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze this

Re: Reviewboard needs your attention

Hi Animesh, I get the same results using Firefox. I assume there are supposed to be buttons to the left of the Review button? If I make a new Review Request, I see more buttons. Thanks On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Mike is this

Review Request 15349: Overprivisoning changes needed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: Cloudstack-5077. https

Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions

I'd also like to highlight that it isn't a trivial problem. Let's say there's 3 regions: this means there are 3 copies of the user database that are geographically separated by network links that fail quite often (orders of magnitude more than intra-DC networks). Here we run into the consequences

Re: Review Request 13901: fix long cast to double

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13901/ --- (Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 10:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 31.10.2013 02:51, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Want to check if anyone is testing upgrades from prior versions to >> 4.2.1. As Release date is getting close, If there are gaps, would like >> to cover some scenarios in our lab. >> >>

Review Request 15362: Fixed issue with detail view fields marked as 'isPassword' not being obfuscated

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15362/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: clou

Re: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

Yes, that would certainly maintain api compatibility if one creates an ACL without specifying aclid, it creates a new list and applies it to the given network. On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Actually use this link to the message in that thread http://s.apache.org/QKI

RE: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

Actually use this link to the message in that thread http://s.apache.org/QKI > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 11:24 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: RE: api incompatib

Re: 4.2.1 BVT automation results

Thats less than ideal, but better than no testing. Did bugs get filed for the failing tests in 4.2.1? --David On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > 4.2.1 automation not executed from jenkins.buildacloud.org, > > Automation executed in side my company including vmware, > >

Re: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

Kishan, weren't we supposed to create a default ACL container (list) and assign the rule to it, if no ACL list is passed to the call? Shouldn't be hard to fix From: Animesh Chaturvedi mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org"

RE: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

I will let Kishan comment but found this thread http://markmail.org/thread/fxzki6ftqacyrylk > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 9:13 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: api incompatibility between 4.1

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

my code doesn't work when the vlan comes in as numeric. I don't claim that. it only works when it comes in as vlan://. It is then and only then properly parsed into a numeric value. On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Here is the part in your commit about SRX: > > diff --git > a/p

Re: SRX inline with VR

Sorry, I meant the CloudStack major release after 4.3... Got mixed up a little bit... --Sheng On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > Currently we don't support VR as load balancing alone, there are some VR > limitations need to be solved. I think the current plan is

RE: Reviewboard needs your attention

Mike is this the only review that you cannot see, or it's a general problem you are seeing with reviewboard. May be try another browser > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.o

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

Here is the part in your commit about SRX: diff --git a/plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java b/plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java index 3bcbf2d..46ef332 100644 --- a/plugins/network-elem

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

Hi Daan, Your commit has broken BOTH VMware and JuniperSRX, and these are only two functional codes in your commit. The other two modification are comments. So I don't know how your testing can possibly work. Alena has already fixed the Juniper part at: commit 3ab8d8d8f20c453fdc684f177a612922ea

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

Min, I realize that you fixed something and didn't just change code because of no reason. The point is that a vlan might be identified both as and as vlan://. the patch is part of a series that addresses these situations. I will look at this case and make sure either only one is possible or both

Re: SRX inline with VR

Hi Geoff, Currently we don't support VR as load balancing alone, there are some VR limitations need to be solved. I think the current plan is to fix it in Felton. --Sheng On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > All, > > > > Is it possibl

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

Daan, I am curious about this: you mentioned that your patch has been running fine on a mixed xen/vmware cloud environment. How come you didn't encounter the blocker bug filed by Rayees on our automation environment on master branch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5046. A

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 12:52:13PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Sudha, > We can still cut RC but will wait for GA till Daan and others have done > their testing. Abhi, An "RC" here is really a release artifact that's being voted on, so no... please don't do that until you are satisfied t

Re: api incompatibility between 4.1 and 4.2 in ACLs

So I take the silence to simply be a collective "oops". I guess this just should serve as a reminder to not break API compatibility without a discussion. Perhaps our tests will surface this better in the future (although I need to look, I wonder if any ACL tests were also simply changed to accomod

Re: [PROPOSAL] Liaison with ETSI NFV ISG

On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:58:17AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > 2013/11/7 Chiradeep Vittal > > > While I appreciate the confidence, there are weekly calls to attend. > > The particularly interesting one (MANO WG) happens on Wednesdays at 6am > > PST. > > I've tried but there's very little chance

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

Sheng, Min, The use of the word semantics has triggered a line of though I want to share on this. The word vlanid is being used as a homonym in cloudstack, meaning both vlan-number and broadcast-uri-pertaining-to-a-vlan. This has been so since 4.0 and maybe even longer. As I see it; Assuming a vla

Re: Review Request 14605: Fill the creationMonitors based on priority

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14605/#review28546 --- Ship it! Laszlo can you commit this? - Darren Shepherd On Oct. 1

Re: Review Request 15344: Enabling DB HA for cloud stack data bases using mysql active-active solution

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344/#review28545 --- I don't agree with this approach. Following this logic for every po

RE: 4.2.1 BVT automation results

4.2.1 automation not executed from jenkins.buildacloud.org, Automation executed in side my company including vmware, Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 12:20 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: Review Request 15303: Reserved SCSI device number prevents CloudStack to attach more than 6 data volumes to CLOUDSTACK-4790

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15303/#review28542 --- Ship it! commit 97348217c47ad1cb4e242a04ddfcc3696c2a280f - Kishan

Review Request 15351: Fixing bugs from Coverity related to Dereferenced Null after check and as return value.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15351/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cloudstack-git

SRX inline with VR

All, Is it possible to use a Juniper SRX Firewall for firewall features, and a VR for Load Balancing, or do you need to use an F5 to get 'in line' mode If you can use a SRX, what IP gets load balanced, public or private etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect [Description: Mail L

Re: Review Request 14058: Including tests for VPC VM Lifecycle on Tagged hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14058/ --- (Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 1:48 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamk

Re: Review Request 15350: CLOUDSTACK-5107: Decreased memory in service offering so as not to run out of resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/#review28540 --- Commit a2117d46f90ae6a96e3d046e306e524756609f5d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 15350: CLOUDSTACK-5107: Decreased memory in service offering so as not to run out of resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/#review28539 --- Commit 9e6a1eaffe3df0981703dc26ab4cc7043d4ca23f in branch refs/heads

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

Sudha, We can still cut RC but will wait for GA till Daan and others have done their testing. On 08/11/13 5:36 pm, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote: >Abhinandan (RM for 4.2.1), > >You cannot cut RC at least till end of next week i.e Nov 15th. > >Thanks >/sudha > >-Original Message- >From: Daan

Re: Reviewboard needs your attention

This is what I see when logged in: http://i.imgur.com/RZvXuy1.png Am I missing something? Thanks! On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > I can see it fine, were you logged in at that time > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mike Tu

Review Request 15350: CLOUDSTACK-5107: Decreased memory in service offering so as not to run out of resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15350/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. B

Re: Review Request 15348: CLOUDSTACK-5105 Template/ISO download fails cause the object to disappear from UI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/ --- (Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 12:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 15348: CLOUDSTACK-5105 Template/ISO download fails cause the object to disappear from UI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/#review28538 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m., Har

RE: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze this Friday 11/08

Merged the changes to master. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 12:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature freeze this Friday 11/08 I was off - this morning

RE: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

Thanks Wei for covering this path -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:04 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing I am working on upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 some issues have been fixed , exce

RE: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

Abhinandan (RM for 4.2.1), You cannot cut RC at least till end of next week i.e Nov 15th. Thanks /sudha -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:08 AM To: dev Cc: int-tool...@schubergphilis.com; cloud-team Subject: Re: [AC

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

I am working on upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.2.1 some issues have been fixed , except CLOUDSTACK-5076 will fix it today 2013/11/8 Sudha Ponnaganti > Hi, > > Looks like Schuberg Philis is covering 4. 1.1 -> 4.2.1 upgrade > We ( Citrix systems) would cover 4.2 -> 4.2.1 > > I think these two paths mi

Re: Review Request 15348: CLOUDSTACK-5105 Template/ISO download fails cause the object to disappear from UI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/ --- (Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 12:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Review Request 15348: CLOUDSTACK-5105 Template/ISO download fails cause the object to disappear from UI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15348/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5105 http

Strange info on secondary storage after upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0

Dear all, On CloudStack GUI, under Infrastructure > Secondary Storage, I remember we used to have a proper name for each secondary storage. However, after the upgrade to CloudStack 4.2.0, the name disappears and it now becomes the ID like this: NameURLProviderQuickviewc02da448-b9f4-401b-b8d5-83e8

Re: Review Request 15307: Increasing the timeout values to 600 seconds from 300 seconds

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15307/#review28535 --- 9495fbc87317cbcf8b77630d06e52d52dfc19060 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri

Re: Review Request 15263: Added fix for bug 5056.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15263/#review28534 --- commit cf7532e8480385bcc9c5dfd63fb82cd836282028 - SrikanteswaraRao

Re: Review Request 14976: [SSL Termination support] Part2 : Assign certificates to LBs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14976/#review28533 --- Ship it! commit 0076307863e9155273d9e4c14282de429388c9e9 Author: Sy

Re: Review Request 15341: Fix-for-5099: Utils.py-has-wrong-reference, cleaned it. As well added Uniform naming convention

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28532 --- Ship it! Ship It! - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Nov. 8, 2013, 10

Re: Review Request 15341: Fix-for-5099: Utils.py-has-wrong-reference, cleaned it. As well added Uniform naming convention

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28531 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Nov. 8, 2013, 10:43 a.m

Re: [ACS 421] Upgrade testing

Sudha, give us till the end of next week please. I'll report back on friday, ok? On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like Schuberg Philis is covering 4. 1.1 -> 4.2.1 upgrade > We ( Citrix systems) would cover 4.2 -> 4.2.1 > > I think these two paths might be e

Re: Review Request 14648: Added few changes related to 4870

> On Nov. 8, 2013, 9:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > 4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de > > Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > if these patches apply to master, can you make sure to also apply to > master at the same time. thanks They were already applied to master but missing in

Re: Commit 25c8cee01a450ee924fe108cafe54b046485ab2b broke Vmware on Master

H Sheng, All sdn implementations use the field in one way or another as uri. So if this is wrong reverting my patch won't do the trick, I am afraid. I actually think the field should be renamed to broadcastUri, as this is how it is used at the moment by a lot of elements. Going back to only allow

Re: Review Request 15341: Fix-for-5099: Utils.py-has-wrong-reference, cleaned it. As well added Uniform naming convention

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/ --- (Updated Nov. 8, 2013, 10:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Srikantesw

Re: Review Request 15341: Fix-for-5099: Utils.py-has-wrong-reference, cleaned it. As well added Uniform naming convention

> On Nov. 8, 2013, 10:11 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > Santhosh, > > > > Please update the diff instead of uploading them as different file. Also the commit header should be "CLOUDSTACK-5099: " This will ensure that the jira ticket also gets updated upon merge. - Girish ---

Re: Review Request 15341: Fix-for-5099: Utils.py-has-wrong-reference, cleaned it. As well added Uniform naming convention

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15341/#review28528 --- Santhosh, Please update the diff instead of uploading them as diffe

Re: Review Request 15208: Added fix for bug 5032. Provides custom assert facility to test features. Added the new assert to cloudstackTestCase

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15208/#review28527 --- 4.2: c76da53123f4130ac59bdf112171bc2e39af91d4 - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 14925: Added few misc changes to marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14925/#review28526 --- 4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 14875: Fixed few pep8 compliant issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14875/#review28525 --- 4.2: 3a31a7e6 - Girish Shilamkar On Oct. 23, 2013, 1:57 p.m., San

Re: Review Request 14869: Added changes related to bug 4920 and few code clean up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14869/#review28524 --- 4.2: 87983e09e21c51dbef6b2a8a0252b039e32915ad - Girish Shilamkar

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

On Nov 8, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > Super. The Cloudmonkey crash is fixed now. Thanks a a lot, Sebastien!! > > You are right about this line: > - response.setResponseName(DeployVMCmd.getResultObjectName()); > + response.setResponseName(getCommandName()); > > Please also commit this

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

Super. The Cloudmonkey crash is fixed now. Thanks a a lot, Sebastien!! You are right about this line: - response.setResponseName(DeployVMCmd.getResultObjectName()); + response.setResponseName(getCommandName()); Please also commit this change to master. ---

Re: Review Request 14648: Added few changes related to 4870

> On Nov. 8, 2013, 9:15 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > 4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de if these patches apply to master, can you make sure to also apply to master at the same time. thanks - Sebastien --- This is an aut

Re: Review Request 14595: Adding https support to marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14595/#review28521 --- 4.2: 6e1821f585df5c643873ab0ce1e7d91d1d94f00d - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 14648: Added few changes related to 4870

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14648/#review28520 --- 4.2: fba874120bb40ddeceacbc7ef51217f34d3749de - Girish Shilamkar

Re: [DOC] 4.2.0 Templates

On Oct 27, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any update on this? > My commit > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f5e7f46dadda741f10e5b674d0578ade9ba719d7 > made > it into the 4.2.0 docs but > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/922ef76224d4a8534f67f47b97c

Re: Review Request 13922: Minimal Hyper-V Plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13922/#review28519 --- Ship it! The feature was merged and changes committed to master in

Re: Review Request 13922: Minimal Hyper-V Plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13922/#review28518 --- Ship it! The feature was merged and changes committed to master in

Re: Review Request 13745: CLOUDSTACK-4329: [DOC] Added Linux template creation documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/#review28517 --- Marty, it looks like this was lost somehow when we moved to the docs

Re: Review Request 14784: [CLOUDSTACK-4805] Installation instructions drops support for Ubuntu

> On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:38 p.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > this does not seem to apply. Can you please pull the latest and see what's > > going on > > > > thanks > > Travis Graham wrote: > Do you want this based against master or 4.2? The patch was originally > created against 4.2. I t

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

Ryan, I found another bug in that class, can you try again with a fresh pull of 4.2 branch ? thanks On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Can you get on IRC ? > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > >> Finally got a new environment to build from source code (4.2

Review Request 15344: Enabling DB HA for cloud stack data bases using mysql active-active solution

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Darren Shepherd. Bugs: ht

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

Can you get on IRC ? On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > Finally got a new environment to build from source code (4.2 branch). > Unfortunately, it still crashes Cloudmonkey. The error messages are exactly > the same. Here's the new Cloudmonkey log: > > 2013-11-08 16:15:34,242 - reques

Re: [Cloudmonkey] assignVirtualMachine API causes index out of range error

Finally got a new environment to build from source code (4.2 branch). Unfortunately, it still crashes Cloudmonkey. The error messages are exactly the same. Here's the new Cloudmonkey log: 2013-11-08 16:15:34,242 - requester.py:45 - [DEBUG] START Request 2013-11-08 16:15:34,242 -

Re: 4.2.1 BVT automation results

On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I don't think so we are running automation 4.2.1 branch in > jenkins.buildacloud.org, below result is from master branch; > So how did you come up with the results for the 4.2.1 branch ? > http://jenkins.buildacl

Re: Review Request 15175: Added a verifyElementInList utility function

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15175/#review28513 --- 4.2: b18e730108e6a24e00c372e3c56c655ff51106ba - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 15021: Fixed Bug: 4899 : Added Configuration Support to Marvin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15021/#review28512 --- 4.2: e7b6ee10eda85a90c594c9de5d36cc062e069576 - Girish Shilamkar