Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

2013-10-23 Thread Marty Sweet
Hi Indra, This could happen if Compute Offerings are deleted, do all the VMs have the same compute offering? You can check this by clicking on a VM in Instances. If they don't, yet the same issue occurs with all of them (and the set compute offerings exists under the Service Offerings page), then

Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

2013-10-23 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
Hi Indra, While rebooting, the VM looks for the same service offering which was used to deploy the VM earlier. If due to some reason the service offering gets deleted, this issue arises. Regards, Gaurav On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Dear all, > > Wondering if anyone

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

2013-10-23 Thread Ryan Shafer
New to community, but like this idea and think it supports platform agnostic nature of cloudstack. +1 -Ryan Shafer

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

2013-10-23 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
+1 -Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: 21 October 2013 23:42 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack > > As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is propo

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread Wei ZHOU
This looks been fixed by the commit for CLOUDSTACK-4649 by Anthony. 2013/10/24 Prasanna Santhanam > Sorry - appears to have been fixed because the tests have progressed. > > From: > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1798/console > To: > > http://jen

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I'm trying to attach my diff to https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/, but I don't see the necessary buttons. I wonder if I need to get edit access back again? We had trouble with the Wiki. Was this also impacted? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wro

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
Sorry - appears to have been fixed because the tests have progressed. From: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1798/console To: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1799/console On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:16:19AM

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Sure, I can create a diff file and attach it to Review Board. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Sure. The majority of it only affects people who are on your storage > anyway. Perhaps you can post a patch and I can run it through the > simulator to verify that the minor c

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
Is this a clean revert? I would revert the commit as it's blocked the tests running on jenkins as well. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:22:17PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Bumping this as system vms still can?t be deployed on master. > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp So

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Sure. The majority of it only affects people who are on your storage anyway. Perhaps you can post a patch and I can run it through the simulator to verify that the minor change to the existing code hasn't broken the standard storages. I don't think it is since I've thoroughly tested the code I post

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
OK, Marcus, I made the change to detect my volumes and it seems to work just fine. Perhaps another day of testing and we can check this code in. What do you think? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, Marcus...I hadn't read that note,

Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

2013-10-23 Thread Indra Pramana
Dear all, Wondering if anyone can advise on this? Or am I the only one who seem to having this problem? :) Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Dear all, > > Anyone can advise on this? > > > Looking forward to your reply, t

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks, Marcus...I hadn't read that note, but that makes sense. Yes, that must be the root disk for the VM. I can put in code, as you recommend, to handle only my volumes. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > It should be sending the path info for each disk per the XML of t

Re: how to use hashes on c.a.o?

2013-10-23 Thread John Kinsella
This is the output of gpg -v --print-md SHA512, generated as part of the release procedure [1] by tools/build/build_asf.sh 1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+Procedure On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > The hashes that are on c.a.o for the re

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

2013-10-23 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
32-bit vms also "generally" perform better on XenServer (depending on the workload). The issue with 32-bit Linux is that it has usually only has 800M for so for available for the kernel [1]. This limits the number of connections that can be tracked by the conntrack module to around 800/300 =~ 2.5 m

Re: How does HA work?

2013-10-23 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/dwn8AQ On 10/23/13 10:51 AM, "Kelcey Jamison Damage" wrote: >I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat" method for HA, unless that's >changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage. > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Nux!" >To: d

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Slightly off topic but I've noticed that the scripts used to create the vm templates are slightly out of sync between 32bit and 64bit. I just assumed nobody used 64bit and that's why it got out of sync. Darren > On Oct 23, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > > What would be the main reaso

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Updated f3e968b9830a667cb3b55477f1fe8259e56ceffb Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Frankly, I don't really care, I'll just change it to how it was > before. I'll remove the get methods that return a collection. > > Darren > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Suich

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
It should be sending the path info for each disk per the XML of the VM... so it will send all disks regardless of whether or not your adaptor manages that disk, and it's up to your adaptor to ignore any that aren't managed by it. There should be notes to that effect in the code near the disconnectP

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Frankly, I don't really care, I'll just change it to how it was before. I'll remove the get methods that return a collection. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > If there are arguments against it, then lets keep the discussion going. I’m > fine with sorting as

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
If there are arguments against it, then lets keep the discussion going. I’m fine with sorting as well - it was requested by someone else to optimize this. However, just to play devil’s advocate: where would you need a sorted list of strategies rather than just needing the best fit? -- Chris Su

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I found the problem. disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath is being passed in (in my situation) the following: /var/lib/libvirt/images/9887d511-8dc7-4cb4-96f9-01230fe4bbb6 Due to the name of the method, my code was expecting data such as the following: /dev/disk/by-path/ip-192.168.233.10:3260-iscsi-iqn.

Re: Tags on storagePool

2013-10-23 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4942 -Alena. From: Prachi Damle mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:04 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
So your asking to not use the sorting logic and instead do the style of Priority highestPriority = Priority.CANT_HANDLE; Priority priority = strategy.canHandle(...); if (priority.ordinal() > highestPriority.ordinal()) { highestPriority = priority; strategyToUse = strategy; } The problem I

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

2013-10-23 Thread John Kinsella
+1 On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of > source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated > with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. > > The cl

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Take a look at revision 3 of my changes here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/3/#index_header The changes I made were due to discussion in the reviews. It should be simpler, cleaner and more efficient logic than using comparators. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Sorry, I don't follow your question. I have time today. What would you like me to do? As it stands right now, what is on master, I'm not aware of any issues. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Darren, > > Would you be able to look into copy the logic back in

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Darren, Would you be able to look into copy the logic back into your refactoring today or tomorrow? If not, I may be able to in the morning. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Bumping this as system vms still can’t be deployed on master. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:43 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Adding the commit author. > > -- > Chris S

Re: Unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch: "Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56FP1Resource.createVmFromTemplat

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Yes - I sent out an email about it earlier. I’ll bump the thread. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Hi, > > My management server is unable to start S

Unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch: "Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56FP1Resource.createVmFromTemplate(Xe

2013-10-23 Thread Jessica Wang
Hi, My management server is unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch. Does anyone see the same error? 2013-10-23 15:02:25,287 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2593db33) Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
My understanding is that it is still a work in progress to get those test back running. Is this correct, Edison? -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
I fixed all the compilation errors in engine/storage/integration-test. I don't know how to run those test though, so I can't validate the changes. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Yep. I’m running on a clean master. > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.

Re: Review Request 14889: Expose as much type information to commands.xml as well as to the generated python clasesss for Marvin

2013-10-23 Thread Ryan Dietrich
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14889/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 9:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Marcus Sorens

Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades

2013-10-23 Thread Daan Hoogland
looks alright Kishan, two litle remarks Alex is mentioning redundant router. Can we add some kind of spec that the redundant pair is guaranteed not to be upgraded at the same time? As for the downloading the template to primary storage before rebooting; I think it is safe to download it to all p

Review Request 14889: Expose as much type information to commands.xml as well as to the generated python clasesss for Marvin

2013-10-23 Thread Ryan Dietrich
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14889/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Marcus Sorensen and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposito

RE: Tags on storagePool

2013-10-23 Thread Prachi Damle
Alena, I don't know why it was designed this way in first place - a design like host_tags where we have separate table to store tags is much better for Allocators to work on. It is a bug, but will cause problem only if we land up with situation explained below: Given the existing design of st

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Yep. I’m running on a clean master. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Okay let me look at that. Are you 100% sure your looking at a clean version

Re: Tags on storagePool

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
If someone logs a JIRA ticket on this, please note that the updateStoragePool command would need to be corrected, as well, because it has special knowledge of a true value meaning that the name is a storage tag. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote

Re: Tags on storagePool

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I agree - this is a bug. We should not assume because a value is true that the name is a storage tag. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement > on storage, based on stora

Tags on storagePool

2013-10-23 Thread Alena Prokharchyk
I came across a potential bug in the way allocators do volumes placement on storage, based on storage tags. Prachi, can you please confirm if the bug is real. The tags are passed to the createStoragePool API in form of tags='tag1,tag2,..': ?command=createStoragePool&...&tags=alena and stored

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Okay let me look at that. Are you 100% sure your looking at a clean version of master? Darren > On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" > wrote: > > Er, sorry. That was poorly worded on my part. Some classes, like > SnapshotTest.java and all the storage providers, did not get up

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Er, sorry. That was poorly worded on my part. Some classes, like SnapshotTest.java and all the storage providers, did not get updated references to your refactoring. They still reference StrategyPriority.pickStrategy(), etc. Additionally, I changed the pickStrategy() logic from using a comparato

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
The transaction API was changed in the merge. I could have maybe missed updating a class. Let me check. When you said "It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all," can you point to something specific that got lost? Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:05 PM, SuichI

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #1585

2013-10-23 Thread jenkins
See

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
And it looks like some of your changes may have not merged correctly. I’m getting compile errors like: The method close() is undefined for the type Transaction This shouldn’t have come from our merge. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
I can fix it, let me see what I broke. Darren > On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:03 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" > wrote: > > It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all. I > should have been more clear in my review - there are logic changes that > needed to be carried fr

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
It looks like the changes from us didn’t make it through your merge at all. I should have been more clear in my review - there are logic changes that needed to be carried from my changes into yours, not simply a rebase. I will work on those changes and try to get a patch up shortly. -- Chris S

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
You know, I forgot we supposed to be doing that! :) Multi-tasking too much today, I guess. Anyways, it must not be working because I still had a hypervisor connection after I shut down the VM. Let me investigate. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Are we not disconnectin

StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Chris, Edison, You guys just committed 'Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot.' At the same time I was merging both my txn-refactor and spring-modularization branches. They are really tricky merges and each time I have to rebase it takes awhile to figure out. Anyhow, your change + my changes bre

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Are we not disconnecting when we stop the vm? There's a method for it, we should be. disconnectPhysicalDiskViaVmSpec On Oct 23, 2013 1:28 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > I see one problem for us now, Marcus. > > * You have a running VM that you attach a volume to. > * You stop the VM. > * You detac

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I see one problem for us now, Marcus. * You have a running VM that you attach a volume to. * You stop the VM. * You detach the volume. * You start up the VM. The VM will not be connected to the volume (which is good), but the hypervisor will still be connected to the volume. It would be great if

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

2013-10-23 Thread Clayton Weise
+1 -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:36 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack +1 > -Original Message- > From: Donal Laf

Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot

2013-10-23 Thread Chris Suich
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 7:19 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #1584

2013-10-23 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-4024: UI > (1) detailView widget - add action handler for prepareObjectStoreMigration. [laszlo.hornyak] Integer instantation removed [laszlo.hornyak] Safe properties loader --

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Rayees Namathponnan
Congrats Talluri -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara Congratulations Talluri! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeeth

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

2013-10-23 Thread Rayees Namathponnan
Congrats Sowmya -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:34 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya Woohooo!!! Congrats Sowmya! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sangeetha Har

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

2013-10-23 Thread Rayees Namathponnan
Congrats Girsih -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:34 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish Nice work Girish! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan <

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
OK, whatever way you prefer then, Marcus (createVdb first or second). If I leave createVdb first and return 0, it does seem to work. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I think we could flip-flop these two lines if necessary: > > createVbd(conn, vmSpec, vmName

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

2013-10-23 Thread Chip Childers
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of > source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated > with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. > > The clien

Re: Review Request 14549: Rename net.juniper.contrail to org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail

2013-10-23 Thread Pedro Marques
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 6:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes ---

Re: Review Request 14823: Refactor StrategyPriority

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
> On Oct. 22, 2013, 1:19 p.m., Chris Suich wrote: > > Darren, the design of all of this has already changed here: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/. Take a look at the newer revisions > > which haven't made it in yet (still waiting on a final review from John > > Burwell). Could you take

Re: How does HA work?

2013-10-23 Thread Kelcey Jamison Damage
I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat" method for HA, unless that's changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage. - Original Message - From: "Nux!" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:48:40 AM

How does HA work?

2013-10-23 Thread Nux!
Hello, Since I'm not a programmer reading the code doesn't make too much sense to me. Can anyone explain to me how HA works (for VMs expecially)? Who monitors these HA VMs? Can I run multiple monitors, for HA? Any recommendations, best practices, gotchas? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Del

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

2013-10-23 Thread Koushik Das
Congrats Girish! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:08 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Girish > Shilamkar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have > accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to co

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

2013-10-23 Thread Ahmad Emneina
Nice work Girish! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan < sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Girish!! > > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

2013-10-23 Thread Ahmad Emneina
Woohooo!!! Congrats Sowmya! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan < sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Sowmya! > > -Original Message- > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [ANNOU

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Ahmad Emneina
Congratulations Talluri! On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan < sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com> wrote: > Congrats Talluri!! > > -Original Message- > From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:16 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I think we could flip-flop these two lines if necessary: createVbd(conn, vmSpec, vmName, vm); _storagePoolMgr.connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec(vmSpec); I haven't actually tried it though. But in general I don't see the Libvirt DiskDef using size at all, which is what createV

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan
Congrats Talluri!! -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara Congrats Talluri -Original Message- From: Sanjeev

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish

2013-10-23 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan
Congrats Girish!! -Original Message- From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:59 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Shilamkar, Girish Congratz, Girish -Original Message- From: Prasa

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

2013-10-23 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan
Congrats Sowmya! -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:43 AM To: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya Congrats Sowmya! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

2013-10-23 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Little problem that I wanted to get your take on, Marcus. When a VM is being started, we call createVdb before calling connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec. The problem is that createVdb calls getPhysicalDisk and my volume has not yet been connected because connectPhysicalDisksViaVmSpec has not yet been

RE: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades

2013-10-23 Thread Alex Huang
+1. That's the way to do it with no downtime. Tighter control needs to be formed on the VR to VR version compatibility though. It's one reason I always support that we break VR into smaller pieces. Redundant VRs work great as routing but then if you have to handle DHCP, DNS, Load Balancing,

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
Adding the commit author. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:39 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken by commit > e33ae74067d5

Deploy systemvms broken on master

2013-10-23 Thread SuichII, Christopher
It appears that the deployment of systemvms was broken by commit e33ae74067d5d7ff165098028c0bd6897f14bbd2, specifically, the change here

Re: Review Request 14855: [Ssl Termination Support] Certificate managenemt interface

2013-10-23 Thread Syed Ahmed
> On Oct. 22, 2013, 9:56 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerCertMapVO.java, line 31 > > > > > > Their really should be a state field, not just a simple boolean flag > >

Re: Review Request 14855: [Ssl Termination Support] Certificate managenemt interface

2013-10-23 Thread Syed Ahmed
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14855/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 4:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Darren Shephe

maven parallel builds

2013-10-23 Thread Darren Shepherd
Just throwing this out there. We all know the maven build is slow. It never donned on me until now that maybe maven would have a parallel build option and it does [1]. I wouldn't recommend this for official builds or jenkins jobs, but for developers use the parallel build option. Basically add '

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

2013-10-23 Thread Koushik Das
Congrats Sowmya! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:16 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya > Krishnan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have > accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contributors to con

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Koushik Das
Congrats Talluri! On 23-Oct-2013, at 4:07 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Srikanteswara > Talluri to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have > accepted. > > Being a committer allows many contribut

RE: Regarding vhd-util binary

2013-10-23 Thread Donal Lafferty
I have seen problems with an out of date vhd-util, e.g. http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html You could check that you are using the version of vhd-util you downloaded using "which vhd-util". However, why don't you first rule out CIFS as the problem

Re: Review Request 14855: [Ssl Termination Support] Certificate managenemt interface

2013-10-23 Thread Syed Ahmed
> On Oct. 22, 2013, 9:56 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/loadbalancer/UploadSslCertCmd.java, > > lines 34-35 > > > > > > I don't understand why a password is needed? Pas

Review Request 14876: CLOUDSTACK 2233: Automation test cases for Add Remove Networks to VM

2013-10-23 Thread Gaurav Aradhye
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14876/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. R

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

2013-10-23 Thread Marty Sweet
What would be the main reasoning behind this change? Surely the minimalistic specifications that SystemVMs are assigned suit 32-bit better in terms of Memory? "The main disadvantage of 64-bit architectures is that, relative to 32-bit architectures, the same data occupies more space in memory (due

RE: Regarding vhd-util binary

2013-10-23 Thread Rajesh Battala
Hi Donal, I had mounted the cifs with rw permission. I was able to touch and write data to file and read it. But when used vhd-util to query/read the the vhd files present on cifs am getting error. root@rajesh-HVM-domU:~/testvhd# /root/vhd-util read -p -n /root/testvhd/template/tmpl/1/9/4382

Re: Review Request 14874: Marvin Plugin Changes: Adding timestamp and timetaken in seconds for a given testcase run to console

2013-10-23 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S

Review Request 14875: Fixed few pep8 compliant issues

2013-10-23 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14875/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

RE: Regarding vhd-util binary

2013-10-23 Thread Donal Lafferty
Make sure your O/S support for CIFS includes read/write of files in mounted CIFS share. E.g. use vi to create and then edit a file on the shared storage from your management server. DL > -Original Message- > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] > Sent: 23 October

Re: Review Request 14459: CLOUDSTACK-2243: Add automation tests for VMs base image update faclity

2013-10-23 Thread Ashutosh Kelkar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:33 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shi

Review Request 14874: Marvin Plugin Changes: Adding timestamp and timetaken in seconds for a given testcase run to console

2013-10-23 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

RE: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades

2013-10-23 Thread Kishan Kavala
Spec for this feature is available at [1]. For 4.3, as mentioned in the spec, enough flexibility is provided but the communication with older version systemVms will be limited. Please provide your feedback. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Improve+SystemVm+upgrades >

Re: Review Request 14874: Marvin Plugin Changes: Adding timestamp and timetaken in seconds for a given testcase run to console

2013-10-23 Thread Santhosh Edukulla
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14874/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 1:22 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S

Command sequence logic in agent code

2013-10-23 Thread Koushik Das
I was looking at the command sequencing logic in the agent code. Each agent maintains a sequence that gets initialised based on following logic private static final Random s_rand = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis()); _nextSequence = s_rand.nextInt(Short.MAX_VALUE) << 48; For every co

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

2013-10-23 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
On 23/10/13 3:48 pm, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Abhinandan Prateek > wrote: >> >> We are planning to make 64-bit system vm templates as default >>offering in 4.2.1. >> This is an initial email to have thoughts from the community on this. >> >> -abhi > >-1 >Who is t

Regarding vhd-util binary

2013-10-23 Thread Rajesh Battala
Hi All, I had downloaded the vhd-util from http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/tools/vhd-util . I have an vhd file in the NFS share. I had mounted in my mgmt. server and tried vhd-util read -p -n "path of file" it works. But the same file when present in CIFS share, mounted on my mgmt. se

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya

2013-10-23 Thread Rajesh Battala
Hearty Congratulations :) -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:17 PM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Krishnan, Sowmya The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sowmya

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Rajesh Battala
Hearty Congratulations :) -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:08 PM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sr

Re: Can't create cluster in CS 4.2

2013-10-23 Thread Denis Finko
Also links to screenshots of our networking configuration: http://imageshack.us/f/855/zbtu.png/ http://imageshack.us/f/708/840z.png/ On 10/23/2013 01:51 PM, Denis Finko wrote: > Links to attached files: > http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/7oi1.png/ > http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/841

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara

2013-10-23 Thread Sailaja Mada
Congrats Talluri. -Original Message- From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Talluri, Srikanteswara Congrats Talluri -Original Message- From: Sanjeev N

  1   2   >