Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0, KVM hypervisors and Ceph RBD primary storage.
We are able to create a volume snapshot of a VM instance's root-disk, and
convert the snapshot into a template. However, we are not able to create a
new VM instance based on the template.Error messages on both
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14305/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 5:11 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da
Hi guys,
I read about the new feature on 4.2 version: "dynamic scaling of CPU and
RAM" -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamic+scaling+of+CPU+and+RAM
I'm wonder why we don't support autoscaling CPU and RAM feature, which acts
like the current autoscaling. Particularly, wh
Daan, thanks for taking a stab at it.
On 18/10/13 5:43 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>If I knew it was that simple I wouldn't have let it make the
>responsiveness report Abhinandan (this is /me volunteering)
>
>On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
> wrote:
>>
>> Can someone from comm
Don't ask me, but it works now (I've been having this trouble quite a while
today).
I guess the trick is to send you an e-mail. :)
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a shared
> primary storage? By default
I created a Compute Offering for my instance that uses the local storage of
the KVM host (along with a 1 GHz CPU and 256 MB RAM).
It has worked in the past...just been having these weird issues after
rebasing on top of master this week.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
Did you create a service offering that uses local storage, or add a shared
primary storage? By default there is no storage that matches the built in
offerings.
On Oct 20, 2013 9:39 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and
With active help of community and dedicated engineers from Citrix we have made
some tremendous progress in fixing blockers and criticals targeted for this
maintenance release. In last two weeks around 70 tickets were resolved (~38
blockers and criticals).
There are roughly 15 criticals/blockers
By the way, when I examine the info for the one Pod I have, it looks fine
(the same as it always looks).
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and was
> able to cr
Hey Marcus,
So, I went back to the branch of mine that has your code and mine and was
able to create a new CloudStack install from scratch with it (once again,
after manually deleting what was in /var/lib/libvirt/images to the get
system VMs to start).
Anyways, my system VMs are running now and I
Another reminder to see if anyone is interested to cover the following topics.
Some of you are going to try upgrades and some of the features anyways so
checking to see if you would like to sign up for validation of the following
areas.
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:
Shanker,
We were using the nonoss build, and we had to add a line in the
nonossComponentContext.xml (like the ticket says). I did not try with
the oss version, maybe there is a ossComponentContext.xml somewhere... I
don't know.
After I got pass this issue, I am still stuck on KVM system vms
On 20-Oct-2013, at 10:41 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> On 10-Oct-2013, at 2:40 AM, Francois Gaudreault
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Phong about the networking answers. I will follow the KVM docs.
>>
>> Regarding the resource manager, we did compile the nonoss package on our
>> own. Are you saying we re
Hi All,
Automation blocked due to below defect; management server failed to start with
latest 4.2 branch build.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4903
Below check in is done for management server start issue;
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a
On 10-Oct-2013, at 2:40 AM, Francois Gaudreault
wrote:
> Thanks Phong about the networking answers. I will follow the KVM docs.
>
> Regarding the resource manager, we did compile the nonoss package on our own.
> Are you saying we require an extra deps?
Hi Francois,
Have you been able to make
> On Oct. 18, 2013, 12:36 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
> > The params are self explanatory indeed, i like them. The concern I have
> > with them is regarding backward compatibility of the interface. I don't
> > (yet) use the BVT suite due to lack of knowledge on my side. I use the
> > connection
18 matches
Mail list logo
