[ACS4.2.1] bugs triaging

Team, Will be looking for inputs from you all in prioritising the tickets for 4.2.1. Do write back if you think some bug is must fix for the maintenance release. -abhi

Re: High CPU utilization on KVM hosts while doing RBD snapshot - was Re: snapshot caused host disconnected

Hi Wido and all, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail reply. Yes, from the agent logs I can see that the RBD snapshot was created. However, it seems that CPU utilisation goes up drastically during the copying over of the snapshot from primary storage to the secondary storage. === 2013-

RE: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:21 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers! > > +1. > We should get a call out to the community to see who is expectin

what's the reason for the placeholder nic in VPC/VR?

Why is a placeholder nic created before the VRs for the VPC are created? Darren

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Excellent...that template worked like a charm. Thanks! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Perfect > > Almost done downloading...I'll give it a try in a moment. > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> Not password e

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Perfect Almost done downloading...I'll give it a try in a moment. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Not password enabled, root password is just 'password'. I mainly just use > it for devcloud-kvm testing. > On Oct 8, 2013 11:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote: > >> Great -

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Not password enabled, root password is just 'password'. I mainly just use it for devcloud-kvm testing. On Oct 8, 2013 11:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Great - thanks! > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that c

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Great - thanks! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that crufty old > default centos template. > > Register this qcow2 template: > http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/tiny-centos-63.qcow2 > > Needs a service o

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that crufty old default centos template. Register this qcow2 template: http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/tiny-centos-63.qcow2 Needs a service offering with at least 192MB to run. On Oct 8, 2013 11:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Perhaps you might know something about this, Marcus. My instance suffers a Kernel panic while booting up. I'm just using the built-in KVM template (CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM)) with 1 CPU and 512 MB memory. http://i.imgur.com/QuPH2Ub.png I tried to just use an ISO instead, but apparently th

Re: Which DevCloud2 Usage Mode is good for Development and Debugging ????

it was the /etc/hosts script i had to modify, i had change my ip from dhcp to static, so had to include my ip in the hosts file. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Interesting...I see you have another e-mail out on this, as well. > > I'd be c

Re: [DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

So I'm saying if you want to disable a command you put myBadCmd=0 in the commands.properties. So yes, a blacklist over a whitelist. For people paranoid about maybe some command exists that they don't know about, we can even add a "blacklist=false to the command properties. Then the commands.prope

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I'm personally +1. Simulator seems to work On 10/8/13 3:12 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >So what's the verdict? What would it take for everyone to feel warm >and fuzzy about this merge, given the troubled past this community has >had with Spring. I'm not saying the code is perfect, but so far

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

I'm not too sure that its going to be worth it to reuse KeyStoreManager. That code is for storage of certs for the systemvm. So you need to ensure that your changes don't overlap with the systemvm code. Additionally, I don't see that the code handles the chain also. I could be wrong, but just fr

RE: System VM template caching

This seems similar to a problem I had on 4.3 Master with System VM creation. If it is the same problem you can check from API command ListTemplateCommand(), from CloudMonkey and see if it returns a bogus cached value. Then you know it is the same problem. -Soheil http://mail-archives.apache.or

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Might be this one: * https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting Travis On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address. > > SSVM can ping CS MS. > > I think we had a nice debug d

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Found it. As an FYI, this is the doc I was referring to: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address. > > SSVM can ping CS MS.

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address. SSVM can ping CS MS. I think we had a nice debug document for SSVM mentioned on a CS e-mail...I'll try to find it. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying to VNC >

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying to VNC to them if the OS isn't up. I'm assuming you prepped a current system vm template (maybe you're even reusing a secondary storage). If you can ping their 169.254 addresses, you can "cloudstack-ssh 169.254.x.x" as root on the k

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Looks like I'll have to dig up that doc on debugging SSVM...it's been about 30 mins since the VMs came up. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started but the > services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started but the services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up in my fusion vm. If that doesn't get better you may have to log into the system VMS and see what's going on. On Oct 8, 2013 7:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Doh! I d

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Doh! I didn't restart the necessary service after exporting my NFS share. The system VMs come up now; however, SSVM has a dash (-) for its Agent State and the CS MS console keeps printing out the following: INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-3:ctx-018adc41) No running ssvm

Re: [DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

This is a bug. =Alena. On 10/8/13 6:12 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Just simple listVMsCmd with page information, passing listAll=true or not >passing listAll returns the same set of data. > > >Thanks >-min > >On 10/8/13 5:55 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" >wrote: > >>On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

Just simple listVMsCmd with page information, passing listAll=true or not passing listAll returns the same set of data. Thanks -min On 10/8/13 5:55 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: > >>Thanks Alena for the clarification. >> >>If you try ListVMsCmd as a dom

Re: [DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Thanks Alena for the clarification. > >If you try ListVMsCmd as a domain admin, if I pass listAll=false, what >should be the expected behavior? The same as if you don't pass anything. The domain admin will see his own resources (the ones that belong to his

Re: [DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

Thanks Alena for the clarification. If you try ListVMsCmd as a domain admin, if I pass listAll=false, what should be the expected behavior? Should he be able to see VMs under his domain but not owned by him? The current CloudStack behavior will show all VMs under his domain. This seems contradicto

Re: [DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

Maybe we could consider switching from a whitelist to a blacklist, then. A whitelist is certainly easier in terms of a one-step configuration, but a blacklist would allow for much easier plugin development, installation and removal. Perhaps we could find write a script that generates the complet

Re: Contrail plugin

Darren, Using ActionEvents is not desirable for the plugin either... today CloudStack lacks the ability for a component/plugin to associate itself to the life-cycle of an object. It would be ideal if there was a generic way to accomplish that... The contrail plugin wants to know about project cre

Re: Latest Master DB issue

The problem seems to me is whether or not a background job that touches with database respects the bootstrap initialization order. As of VmwareContextPool itself, its background job does something fully within its own territory (no database, no reference outside). and vmware-base package was origin

Re: questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API

Answers inline. From: Jessica Wang mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com>> Date: Tuesday 8 October 2013 5:10 PM To: "mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, Nitin Mehta mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>, Shweta A

Re: questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API

On 10/8/13 5:10 PM, "Jessica Wang" wrote: >Hi, > >I have questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API. > >(1) A normal user is allowed to specify isextractable property when >registering an ISO (through registerIso API), > >but NOT allowed to update isextractable property when u

questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API

Hi, I have questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API. (1) A normal user is allowed to specify isextractable property when registering an ISO (through registerIso API), but NOT allowed to update isextractable property when updating an ISO (through updateIsoPermissions API). Is

Review Request 14549: Rename net.juniper.contrail to org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Thanks Edison for the reply. I see that there is already an implementation of KeystoreManager which does certificate validation and saves it in the keystore table. Also, the API (UploadCustomCertificate) is only callable from admin. I could add functionality to this class for handling certif

Re: [DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

On 10/8/13 4:28 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Hi there, > >In working with RBAC design, I am really puzzled by the two query >parameter "listAll" and "recursive" for all BaseListDomainResourceCmd. > > >@Parameter(name = ApiConstants.LIST_ALL, type = CommandType.BOOLEAN, >description = "If set to fal

Re: Typo in KVM docs

That's what I get for not fact checking. Dagnabbit. On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Ok great, I wasn't sure since Travis kinda made the same typo like the > docs ;P > > Thanks! > > Francois > > On 10/8/2013, 4:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > >> We decided it is 16509 (whi

[DISCUSS] listAll and recursive parameters for BaseListDomainResourceCmd should have default value as TRUE

Hi there, In working with RBAC design, I am really puzzled by the two query parameter "listAll" and "recursive" for all BaseListDomainResourceCmd. @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.LIST_ALL, type = CommandType.BOOLEAN, description = "If set to false, " + "list only resources belo

RE: [DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

I think commands.properties is not just providing ACL on the API - but it also serves as a whitelist of APIs available on the deployment. It can be a one-step configuration option to disable certain functionality. Prachi -Original Message- From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph..

Re: [DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

On 10/8/13 3:23 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >I would like to largely remove commands.properties. I think most API >commands naturally have a default ACL that should be applied. I think >it makes sense to add to the @APICommand flags for user, domain, >admin. Then, as an override mechanism, pe

RE: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

There is command in ACS, UploadCustomCertificateCmd, which can receive ssl cert, key can chain as input. Maybe can share some code? > -Original Message- > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:54 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >

RE: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

> -Original Message- > From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:54 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations? > > A hypervisor snapshot will snapshot memory also. So determin

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Can you mount the secondary storage from your KVM host? On Oct 8, 2013 4:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following issues in the CS > MS console (any thoughts on this?): > > WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was unable to > f

[DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

I would like to largely remove commands.properties. I think most API commands naturally have a default ACL that should be applied. I think it makes sense to add to the @APICommand flags for user, domain, admin. Then, as an override mechanism, people can edit commands.properties to change the def

RE: Latest automation result on master

Correction, this result on Xen not KVM; KVM automation stopped in http://jenkins.buildacloud.org due to KVM blocker; I will publish the result once its available. Regards, Rayees From: Rayees Namathponnan Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Latest

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

So what's the verdict? What would it take for everyone to feel warm and fuzzy about this merge, given the troubled past this community has had with Spring. I'm not saying the code is perfect, but so far its not terribly bad :) Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

BouncyCastle, its already in ACS. Off list I'll send you some sample code on how to validate this stuff. Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > Thanks Darren for your reply. > > Do you happen to have any info on a library that I can use for certificate > validation? > > Than

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following issues in the CS MS console (any thoughts on this?): WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref2 and thread id 2049868806 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (secstora

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

So...got some good news: I spent a couple hours setting up a KVM environment on Ubuntu 12.04.1 from scratch (Installing SSH, Open iSCSI, Java 7, KVM, Git, CloudStack, CloudStack DEBs, KVM system template, etc.) and I can now add this KVM host to CloudStack (on a related note, no errors in agent.er

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

A hypervisor snapshot will snapshot memory also. So determining whether do to the hypervisor snapshot from the quiesce option does not seem proper. Sorry, for all the questions, I'm trying to get to the point of understand if this functionality makes sense at this point of code or if maybe their

Re: Latest automation result on master

Thanks Rayees - this is helpful. --David On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @ > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/ > > We had 100% pass rate in 4.2, but in latest mas

Re: JIRA - release 4.3 required in Affected and Fix version list

Done. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Jira Admins, > > I am want to create defect against master, but there is no option to select > 4.3 "Affected and Fix Version", someone with admin access please add this ? > > Regards, > Rayees

Latest automation result on master

Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @ http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/ We had 100% pass rate in 4.2, but in latest master its reduced around 85%, observed below issues with latest master run https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Some more info about this. What specifically is happening is that the VmwareContextPool call is creating a Timer during the constructor of the class which is being constructed in a static block from VmwareContextFactory. So when the VmwareContextFactory class is loaded by the class loader, the ba

Re: VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi Chris, Correct, I am talking about a way to orchestrate backing up and restoring an entire VM (or set of VM's), but using more efficient technique at the back end to transfer data. Today we do the following: - When a CS account is created we create a corresponding vSphere folder, and we ensur

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Hey, I half way introduced this issue in a really long and round about way. I don't think there's a good simple fix unless we merge the spring-modularization branch. I'm going to look further into it. But here's the background of why we are seeing this. I introduced "Managed Context" framework

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Whether the hypervisor snapshot happens depends on whether the 'quiesce' option is specified with the snapshot request. If a user doesn't care about the consistency of their backup, then the hypervisor snapshot/quiesce step can be skipped altogether. This of course is not the case if the default

Re: VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi Simon, The answer to your question is 'kind of'. The Storage Subsystem API (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+subsystem+2.0) allows storage providers to implement a suite of methods for the purpose of storage management, including taking and reverting snapshots o

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Thanks Darren for your reply. Do you happen to have any info on a library that I can use for certificate validation? Thanks, -Syed On Tue 08 Oct 2013 04:53:40 PM EDT, Darren Shepherd wrote: The API should do input validation on the SSL cert, key and chain. Getting those three pieces of info

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Who is going to decide whether the hypervisor snapshot should actually happen or not? Or how? Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:38 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp Software Engineer > Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions > Citrix, Cisco & R

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

The API should do input validation on the SSL cert, key and chain. Getting those three pieces of info is usually difficult for most people to get right as they don't really know what those three things are. There's about a 80% chance most calls will fail. If you rely on the provider it will proba

Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot

> On Oct. 8, 2013, 8:18 p.m., edison su wrote: > > ui/scripts/storage.js, line 1763 > > > > > > The ui change here, is there way to disable it from ui, if the storage > > provider is not NetApp? Or move the ui change

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Ok great, I wasn't sure since Travis kinda made the same typo like the docs ;P Thanks! Francois On 10/8/2013, 4:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: We decided it is 16509 (which is what is the default and was - at one point - written incorrectly in the documentation as 16059). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

A question about implementation. I was looking at other commands and the execute() method for each of the other commands seem to call a service ( _lbservice for example ) which takes care of updating the DB and calling the resource layer. Should the Certificate management be implemented as a se

Re: Typo in KVM docs

We decided it is 16509 (which is what is the default and was - at one point - written incorrectly in the documentation as 16059). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Ok now I am mixed up :P > > libvirtd.conf has 16509 by default. (at least on

Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/#review26786 --- ui/scripts/storage.js

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Ok now I am mixed up :P libvirtd.conf has 16509 by default. (at least on CentOS) So is it 16509 or 16059? :P Francois On 10/8/2013, 2:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: I was actually looking at what's on the web for 4.2 (even though I'm developing on master). When I went to find this isssue in 4.

JIRA - release 4.3 required in Affected and Fix version list

Hi Jira Admins, I am want to create defect against master, but there is no option to select 4.3 "Affected and Fix Version", someone with admin access please add this ? Regards, Rayees

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

-- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > So in the implementation, when we say "quiesce" is that actually being > implemented as a VM snapshot (memory and

VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi, Can anyone tell me if there are plans to implement a more comprehensive mechanism to backup data within guest VM's, or to provide a framework for backup vendors to plug into? This is needed because: 1. The native volume snapshot functionality is slow and does not provide the required f

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Thanks for the feedback guys. Really appreciate it. 1) Changing the name to SSL Termination. I don't have a problem with that. I was looking at Netscaler all the time and they call it SSL offloading. But I agree that termination is a more general term. I have changed the name. The new page is a

[ACS 4.2][Upgrade Issue] System VM template caching

Hi, Several of us in the community have found that with the 4.2 upgrade, when we download and install the latest system VM template, CloudStack refuses to use this template for new system VM creation. CloudStack appears to be usin a cached or master-clone variant of the old template. This is

Re: Typo in KVM docs

I was actually looking at what's on the web for 4.2 (even though I'm developing on master). When I went to find this isssue in 4.3, it appears the problem has been corrected. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that Davi

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that David's plan is that we are baselines on 4.2 in the new docs repo, and he was going to then pull from 4.2 into master (again, in the new repo). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I have some other KVM docs that I'v

Re: Typo in KVM docs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:44:43PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I see the KVM install guide says: > > tcp_port = "16059" > > > I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is > in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default. Which doc version? I found these bug

Re: Typo in KVM docs

I have some other KVM docs that I've been updating as I do my development work, so I should be able to modify this, as well. Thanks! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Travis Graham wrote: > Yep, that's a typo. Should be 16059 like libvirtd.conf has by default. > > If you'll open a Jira for it I

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Yep, that's a typo. Should be 16059 like libvirtd.conf has by default. If you'll open a Jira for it I'll submit a patch the docs. Travis On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I see the KVM install guide says: > > tcp_port = "16059" > > > I'm wondering if this is corre

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Technicality here, can we call the functionality SSL termination? > While technically we are "offloading" ssl from the VM, offloading > typically carries a connotation that its being done in hardware. So > we are really talking abo

Typo in KVM docs

Hi, I see the KVM install guide says: tcp_port = "16059" I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default. Thanks, -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Technicality here, can we call the functionality SSL termination? While technically we are "offloading" ssl from the VM, offloading typically carries a connotation that its being done in hardware. So we are really talking about SSL termination. Couple comments. I wouldn't want to assume anything

RE: Latest Master DB issue

Here the defect created for this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4825 Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:15 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Latest Maste

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

So in the implementation, when we say "quiesce" is that actually being implemented as a VM snapshot (memory and disk). And then when you say "unquiesce" you are talking about deleting the VM snapshot? In NetApp, what are you snapshotting? The whole netapp volume (I don't know the correct term),

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

> -Original Message- > From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack > > Comments Inline. > > -Original Message- > From: Edison

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

+1. We should get a call out to the community to see who is expecting to merge for 4.3. Although 10/31 is the feature freeze date, proposals and branches should be in already IMHO. On 10/8/13 9:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

[New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Hi, I have been working on adding SSL offload functionality to cloudstack and make it work for Netscaler. I have an initial design documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSL+Offloading+Support and I would really love your feedback. The bug for this is https://iss

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

I can comment on the second half. Through storage operations, storage providers can create backups much faster than hypervisors and over time, their snapshots are more efficient than the snapshot chains that hypervisors create. It is true that a VM snapshot taken at the storage level is slightl

Re: Latest Master DB issue

I guess in my case, it's fine. It was a fresh install... Francois On 10/8/2013, 2:08 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: Deploy db from maven will drop all the tables. Not sure if this is fresh install or not. For master, running mvn will be your best bet. Otherwise you can look at running com.cloud.u

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I'm not getting any notifications of BVT test failures. Where do I subscribe? On 10/8/13 10:20 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT >(and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists >somewhere doing something, but

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Deploy db from maven will drop all the tables. Not sure if this is fresh install or not. For master, running mvn will be your best bet. Otherwise you can look at running com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseCreator manually if your adventurous. Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Francois Gaudreault

Re: Latest Master DB issue

I'm not familiar with RPM install, but I don't think that the workaround would be valid for everyone - QA folks will not have mvn install on their machines, so this issue is a blocker for them. You can try it on your setup though to unblock yourself. It does have to be fixed in master, either by s

Re: Hypervisor Questions

OK, so, I've collected a bunch of info with regards to how CS handles HA, DRS, FT, and LV. Can people confirm or deny this information: CloudStack 4.2: XenServer: HA: Request made by CloudStack (handled by hypervisor). No prioritization*. FT: No such feature (warm secondary VM...HA with e

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Thanks Alena for the explaination. What is the better path to fix this on our setup? Should I wait for a fix in master or should I manually run the deploydb with mvn? I guess the second option won't work since I used RPM? Francois On 10/8/2013, 1:47 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Ok, this is

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Just throwing in a pitch for my spring-modularization branch. The DB initialization stuff should all be fixed in the spring-modularization branch. If it isn't we can better address it there anyhow. The current initialization of spring in master is pure madness. When it works, its because it jus

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

My only comment is that having the return type as boolean and using to that indicate quiesce behaviour seems obscure and will probably lead to a problem later. Your basically saying the result of the takeVMSnapshot will only ever need to communicate back whether unquiesce needs to happen. Maybe s

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Ok, this is what going on - the DB upgrade procedure is different on developer's setup and when deployed using cloudstack-setup-databases On developers setup: 1) you deploy the code 2) Deploy the DB using 'mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb'. As a part of this step, the DataBaseUpgradeChec

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Hmm... I just checked the DB version and it's 4.0??? It should be 4.3.0 no? mysql> select * from version; ++-+-+--+ | id | version | updated | step | ++-+-+--+ | 1 | 4.0.0 | 2013-10-08 10:58:49 | Co

Re: Contrail plugin

I'll take some time and review this code too. I already know there's going to be a conflict with the stuff I did in the spring modularization branch. Moving to full spring we have gotten rid of the custom ACS AOP for the mgmt server. This code relies on that framework so it will have to move to

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

>From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT (and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists somewhere doing something, but I have no clue what it really means). So in turn my spring modularization branch will additionally fail BVT. Citrix internal QA

Re: Latest Master DB issue

It's a fresh master RPM install. Francois On 10/8/2013, 12:40 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: It is not a small issue. is_default filed was added to the table as a part of the 41-42 db upgrade. Looks like the code tries to retrieve system user before the db upgrade is completed. DB upgrade is a m

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:43:39AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > Chip, > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail > > branch. > > > > I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Whomever wants to take the lead for 4.3 should probably (IMO), start a > > discussion on (1) coordination of work and > [Animesh>] Since we are getting closer to code freeze date and we cannot find > overall release manage

  1   2   >