Re: quick systemvm question

Marcus, (1) cloud-install-sys-tmplt update the template with max(id) select max(id) from cloud.vm_template where type = \"SYSTEM\" and hypervisor_type = \"KVM\" and removed is null"` (2) upgrade process update the template with specified name. in Upgrade410to420.java pstmt = conn.prepareStatemen

RE: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse

suitableformigration isn't an attribute of the storage pool. It just tells whether a particular pool is suitable for migrating a particular volume. For example, if volume A has to be migrated to another pool, then the pools available are listed and if the tags on the pool and volume do not match

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 9fe7846

In my point view, we ask users register new template in the upgrade instruction in release notes. If they do not register, it is their fault. If they do but upgrade fails, it is our fault. I admit that it is a good way to change each upgrade process and remove old templates when we use new templat

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Min, This looks like an s3cmd problem. I just downloaded the latest s3cmd to check the source code. In S3/FileLists.py: compare_md5 = 'md5' in cfg.sync_checks # Multipart-uploaded files don't have a valid md5 sum - it ends with "...-nn" if compare_md5: if (src

quick systemvm question

How does cloudstack know which template is the latest system vm? Does it match on name or something? From what I have gathered in the upgrade docs, you simply register a new template, like any other, and run a convenience script that restarts your system vms. But I don't gather from this how cloud

Re: KVM development, libvirt

Ok. Do we need to call a vote or something to change our rules to solidify that we should require at least two votes from each supported platform, whether they be automated tests or contributor tests? On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:04:55AM +

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

John, We are not able to successfully download file that was uploaded to Riak CS with TransferManager using S3cmd. Same error as we encountered using amazon s3 java client due to the incompatible ETAG format ( - and _ difference). Thanks -min On Jun 6, 2013, at 5:40 PM, "John Burwell" wrot

Re: Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

That advice is now deprecated. I believe RHT began shipping the patches in 6.2 or 6.3 - so you should be fine with 4.0.x or 4.1 and those version of qemu-* --David On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Thank you for the update... > > However, upon installing Cloud Stack MONTHS

Re: Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

Thank you. I suspect, since it will be updating the qemu- that I should perhaps stop all VM's prior to upgrading, correct? On 2013-06-06 22:41, David Nalley wrote: That advice is now deprecated. I believe RHT began shipping the patches in 6.2 or 6.3 - so you should be fine with 4.0.x or 4.1 a

Re: Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

Thank you for the update... However, upon installing Cloud Stack MONTHS ago, it was said to NOT utilize qemu-img / qemu-kvm that was included in the CentOS repos. qemu-img x86_64 2:0.12.1.2-2.355.0.1.el6.centos.5 u

Re: Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

Hi, (2013/06/07 11:40), Maurice Lawler wrote: Greetings, I am utilizing KVM / CentOS 6.3. / CS 4.0.2 Upon issuing yum update, I am getting a slue of updates for the OS it's self. Previously I was informed that CentOS 6.4 was NOT supported, so I have backed off on updated my OS due to this fact.

Hello (Upgrade to 4.1)

Greetings, I am utilizing KVM / CentOS 6.3. / CS 4.0.2 Upon issuing yum update, I am getting a slue of updates for the OS it's self. Previously I was informed that CentOS 6.4 was NOT supported, so I have backed off on updated my OS due to this fact. I have taken a paste bin of what my system

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Thomas, When using TransferManager, as we are in CloudStack, the MD5 hashes are calculated by the Amazon AWS Java client. It also determines how best to utilize multi-part upload, if at all. I just want to ensure that folks understand the information below applies when interacting with the HT

Re: ACS 4.1.1 release - bugfixes to backport

CLOUDSTACK-2758, I already pushed a patch into 4.1 branch. :-) (2013/06/06 3:22), Musayev, Ilya wrote: Hi All, Sorry I was a bit disconnected from the community - as my $dayjob kept me very busy. I would like to start of this thread to keep track of bugfixes we need to back port from 4.1 to

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2758: touch file for tomcat6 package change CVS 2013-1976

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11620/#review21553 --- Commit 2dc25df62364d4adfe264e6158dcb4b471bc4eb1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Hi guys, The ETAG is an interesting subject. AWS currently maintains 2 different types of ETAGS for objects that I know of. a) PUT OBJECT - assigned ETAG will be calculated from the MD5 checksum of the data content that you are uploading. When uploading you should also always set the Content-MD

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Edison, Riak CS and S3 seed their hashes differently -- causing the form to appear slightly different. In particular, Riak CS uses URI-safe base64 encoding which explains why the ETag values contain "-"s instead of "_"s. From a client perspective, the ETags are treated as opaque strings that

RE: Storage VM to Management Server Connectivity Problem

My machine has multiple NICs but none of them have that IP address (see below). That IP Address comes from deploydb stage as the default value. For some reason when I ran the Management Server it did not update these values, may be this is normal behavior for my use case where I have many potent

RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update

> -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 4:30 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update > > Animesh, > > Couple of things : > > - Thinking to have a Tuesday defect close day

RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update

Animesh, Couple of things : - Thinking to have a Tuesday defect close day to see if there would be any interest to have folks participate. This is dedicated day to focus on closure of defects. Once FF is done, community might be working on closing the defects and till then main focus is to c

RE: Object based Secondary storage.

The Etag created by both RIAK CS and Amazon S3 seems a little bit different, in case of multi part upload. Here is the result I tested on both RIAK CS and Amazon S3, with s3cmd. Test environment: S3cmd: version: version 1.5.0-alpha1 Riak cs: Name: riak Arch: x86_64 Version : 1

RE: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store

> -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 7:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store > > Edison, > > Please my comments in-line below. > > Thanks, > -John > > On J

Re: Handling Self Signed Certs

Will, We don't have a common HTTPS client yet, as far as I know, different module developers probably are using slight different way to deal with self-signed certificate, it is a good time to consolidate it now if it is not too late. You may make the facility available in cloud-utils package and e

Re: Storage VM to Management Server Connectivity Problem

Soheil, I think, your machine have multiple nics. When you deployed cloudstack, 192.168.56.1 should be the ip of first nic, so cloudstack regarded this as the management ip. You need to change these values manually, restart management server, destroy the systemvms (SSVM and CPVM). -Wei 2013/6/6

[ACS42] Release Status Update

Folks The new feature freeze date is 6/28 and the RC is 8/19 Out of 104 proposed features /improvements, the status is |-+-| | New Features / Improvements | | |-+-| | Closed | 6 | | Resolved

RE: Storage VM to Management Server Connectivity Problem

The configuration database is definitely wrong, just not sure how it got that way. -Soheil mysql> select * from configuration where name= "host"; +--+--+---+--+--+-+ | category | instance | component | name | value| desc

RE: Handling Self Signed Certs

What is missing is a facility to import a certificate into the store. If it was available you could use it for self signed CERTS. Ideally it should be part of GUI to add devices. I am implementing a similar HTTP Client. You are using DefaultHttpClient so it is based on the newer Apache librarie

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Hi John, I didn't actually calculating the MD5 explicitly. I traced the code to ServiceUtils.downloadObjectToFile method from amazon s3 sdk, my invocation of S3Utils.getObject failed at the following code in ServiceUtils: byte[] clientSideHash = null; byte[] serverSideHash = null;

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Min, Are you calculating the MD5 or letting the Amazon client do it? Thanks, -John On Jun 6, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Thanks Tom. Indeed I have a S3 question that need some advise from some S3 > experts. To support upload object > 5G, I have used TransferManager.upload > to upload o

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Thanks Tom. Indeed I have a S3 question that need some advise from some S3 experts. To support upload object > 5G, I have used TransferManager.upload to upload object to S3, upload went fine and object are successfully put to S3. However, later on when I am using "s3cmd get " to retrieve this objec

Re: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse

I agree with Prasanna on this. We don't need to introduce several Storage pool related responses just for some specific apis. In some way, suitableFormigration is some kind of attribute that can be set on a storage pool or not. If you don't want to show it to listStoragePool call, you can set that

Re: Handling Self Signed Certs

Hey Kelven, I am using the same https client libraries as elsewhere in Cloudstack (well one of them because there is more than one version of http client libs currently available in CS). I am using this client: import org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultHttpClient; I initialize it like this: _http

Re: deleteVolume is sync

I see what you're saying, Marcus. That makes sense. If it's just marked as deleted, sync is the right way to go. I do know for 4.2 in Edison's storage framework that my plug-in is invoked upon deletion of a CloudStack volume to delete the volume on the SAN (so it appears to be more than marking t

Re: Handling Self Signed Certs

Will, We have several other integrated components that have the similar situation, it makes sense to consolidate the HTTPS client we used across CloudStack and have a global configuration to deal with self-signed certificate for all in testing or POC. To help testing/POC process to be smooth, we

RE: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:14 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I would like to get

Re: deleteVolume is sync

Well, if it doesn't actually delete the volume, just mark it 'destroy' so that the cleanup thread takes care of it, then the api call can stay sync, since it's just changing a database entry. If it does actually do the work right then, then we will need to make it async. I haven't even looked at 4.

RE: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

It should not affect tests. We want to move to mostly if not all automated tests. If we freeze the tests that means no more testing for the release. :P --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:20 PM > To: CloudS

Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:18 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password >> Management Eng

RE: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:18 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password > Management Engine > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Musayev, Ilya > wrote: >

Review Request: Add docbook of GSOC native SDN controller proposal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11678/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- This is the docbook for my

Review Request: fix the occurences of account.account. to account.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11677/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- fix

RE: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:18 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password > Management Engine > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Musayev, Ilya > wrote: >

Re: [GSOC] informal communication and blogs

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 07:15 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > For GSoC informal communication we can also use Twitter (I am @sebgoa). > I am already connected with Dharmesh and Ian. > > It would also be nice to see you guys start a blog about your experience. > Something like blogger.com is easy t

Re: networkACLList

ACL Group, ACL container, ACL collection sounds a lot better than ACL List. "Access Control List List" just reads odd. Feel free to ignore my nitpick though :) On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:11:50AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote: > Preferred API name is NetworkACL, which cannot be used (NetworkACL > is

Re: [ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > ISWest contracted CloudSand to develop the Advanced Password Management > Engine (APME). ISWest the owner and sponsor of APME, would like to donate > the APME feature to Apache CloudStack Community. Special thanks goes to > ISWest - Clay

Re: deleteVolume is sync

If it's a long-running op to delete a volume (which is can be), I would say it should be async. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > So does it just need to be async, or is deleteVolume doing too much in > both moving the volume to destroy state and expunging? If I transitio

[ACS42][DONATED FEATURE] CloudStack Advanced Password Management Engine

ISWest contracted CloudSand to develop the Advanced Password Management Engine (APME). ISWest the owner and sponsor of APME, would like to donate the APME feature to Apache CloudStack Community. Special thanks goes to ISWest - Clayton Weise for supporting the Apache CloudStack Community and ch

Handling Self Signed Certs

Hey All, I am building integration between CS and an external Palo Alto Firewall device. The API calls to the PA device are done over HTTPS. In some cases (like testing or a POC), it makes sense to use a self signed cert for this connection. Currently I have a little http client wrapper which al

Re: deleteVolume is sync

So does it just need to be async, or is deleteVolume doing too much in both moving the volume to destroy state and expunging? If I transition a volume to 'Destroy' state, the storage cleanup thread comes along and deletes it for me later, similar to how the VMs are expunged. This seems preferable,

Re: [DISCUSS] NFS cache storage issue on object_store

Edison, Please my comments in-line below. Thanks, -John On Jun 5, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 1:04 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NFS ca

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Joe, To the best of my knowledge, we have not placed a size restriction on bug fixed for a minor release. As I understand our versioning policy, minor releases are scoped to non-interface breaking bug fixes. Time drift is a non-interface breaking bug, and it is a significant operational issue

Re: Review Request: Add docbook of ldap proposal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11672/#review21520 --- Ship it! Patch applied to master with commit cc7e9eed7e134072910998

Re: Review Request: Add docbook of ldap proposal

> On June 6, 2013, 1:32 p.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > Patch applied to master with commit cc7e9eed7e1340729109983f79200557df22296b > > Make sure that you define a [user] in your .gitconfig so that we can keep > > track of the authorship of the patch properly. And you can mark the review a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #1468

Why is jenkins trying to create a tag in our repo? --David On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > -- > Started by an SCM change > Building remotely on ubuntu2 in wo

Review Request: Add docbook of ldap proposal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11672/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- Add

[GSOC] informal communication and blogs

Hi folks, For GSoC informal communication we can also use Twitter (I am @sebgoa). I am already connected with Dharmesh and Ian. It would also be nice to see you guys start a blog about your experience. Something like blogger.com is easy to use and get started. You can then tweet your blog posts

Re: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 12:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I would like to get everyone's opinions on the timeline and policies > for bringing in automated tests into the repo. Integration tests are > written in marvin by various people today within and without Citrix. > Similar to docs I'd like

RE: StoragePoolForMigrationResponse and StoragePoolResponse

Hi, StoragePoolResponse should really only be used for listing storage pools. Putting a suitableformigration flag etc. makes it weird for other apis. If tomorrow the response object is updated to include more statistics for admin user to make a better decision, then such information gets pushed

Re: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get everyone's opinions on the timeline and policies > for bringing in automated tests into the repo. Integration tests are > written in marvin by various people today within and without Citrix. > Similar to docs I

Review Request: Freshness Check for doc xml on section Storage Setup

For CLOUDSTACK-1597 , I made the changes weeks ago. The commit id on master is: 78ffb7ae5ef9c4383f86fa97cd647316dde507be It'll be great if someone can help to review in case some materials missing or out of date since the storage part changed

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2288: NPE while creating volume from snapshot when the primary storage is in maintenance state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Description --- CLOUDSTAC

RE: [DISCUSS] code-freeze and integration tests

+1 Feature freeze and even RC timelines should not be applicable to automation tests at this time. BVT and other regression tests would continue to be developed beyond release date as well in reality. So dates should not hold for Automation. However having some timeline restriction would hel

RE: networkACLList

Preferred API name is NetworkACL, which cannot be used (NetworkACL is already used to for items within the List). Now naming the API NetworkACLList / Group / Container, when you expand, all of them are equally redundant. > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache

Re: Review Request: Automation: Add testcases for Affinity/Anti-Affinity Rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11067/#review21511 --- Unable to apply this :( ~/workspace/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack

Re: Object based Secondary storage.

Thanks Min. I've printed out the material and am reading new threads. Can't comment much yet until I understand things a bit more. Meanwhile, feel free to hit me up with any S3 questions you have. I'm looking forward to playing with the object_store branch and testing it out. Tom. On Wed, 2013-0

Re: Template of systemvm

Cool! I'm going to use this mirror :) On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:21:33AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> >> >> On 06/06/2013 08:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> >On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:13:21PM +0900, Takaaki Suzuki wrote: >> >

Re: Template of systemvm

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:21:33AM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 06/06/2013 08:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:13:21PM +0900, Takaaki Suzuki wrote: > >>Hi all > >> > >>I want to download the system VM template from > >>"jenkins.cloudstack.org" (URL: > >>

Re: Template of systemvm

On 06/06/2013 08:23 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:13:21PM +0900, Takaaki Suzuki wrote: Hi all I want to download the system VM template from "jenkins.cloudstack.org" (URL: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/app

Re: KVM development, libvirt

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:04:55AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > On 06/06/2013 08:37 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: > >>On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >>>On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

(2013/06/06 14:24), Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:01:10AM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: It took time to investigate what's happening on Ubuntu. Thanks for taking the time to investigate! On Ubuntu, we don't have apparent problem with current setup. We don't have to touc

Re: Template of systemvm

Thank you for your help! The connection is pretty good now. I can download the template of system vm. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:13:21PM +0900, Takaaki Suzuki wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I want to download the system VM template from >> "jen

Re: KVM development, libvirt

On 06/06/2013 08:37 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote: On 06/06/2013 07:10 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:39:16PM +, Edison Su wrote: I think we miss a VOTE from Jenkins, the vote from Jenkins should be take