Re: [Discuss] API name alias

Rohit, that's like saying we won't fix a leaky faucet today because we're moving in a couple of years anyway. It isn't a big deal to add this and it clarifies to the end user what is the correct alias to use. On 4/8/13 9:52 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >If we are still on our previously discussed pl

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

We can't deprecate APIs unless we are changing to 5.0 AFAIK the next release in plan is 4.2 How does an upgrade from 4.0/4.1 to 4.2 work with this proposal? - what happens to existing SSVMs? - if there are multiple SSVMs? - current cache-like deployments for S3 and Swift The SSVM code also does d

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Folks I wanted to get your opinion on auto-assignment > based on the component maintainers list. We can also create shared > issues filters based on components. Folks can subscribe to the > filters of interest and rece

RE: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Mike, I just updated the bug with more analysis. I see that it's the issue due to RandomStoragePoolAllocator. Can you check if the applicationContext.xml has it mentioned? Should be present at same location as the componentContext.xml Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Mike Tutko

Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:56:55PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote: > Prasanna, > Affinity Group Processing is a pre-planning step. It will set the > scope for the deployment planners, there is no conflict between the > planner strategies and affinity groups. These are separate steps of > deployment plan

Re: Review Request: Changes for Egress firewall rules feature support in SRX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/ --- (Updated April 9, 2013, 6:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Network architecture question

Have you considered using a basic zone? With security groups you can have *lots* (thousands of) with very small L2 networks. On 4/8/13 10:28 PM, "Justin Grudzien" wrote: >My team has been working for three weeks with CloudStack architecture >design and we are struggling to put together a network

Network architecture question

My team has been working for three weeks with CloudStack architecture design and we are struggling to put together a network architecture that we feel will scale. From everything I can tell, CloudStack requires a a very large layer 2 network when using shared guest networks. We are looking to de

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Finally got it to happen again. This time two VMs were placed on the same PS instead of each on their own PS. All appears to be configured properly. This is just a log shot, but could this possibly be happening because the iSCSI targets that are being used for storage repositories are not format

Re: Review Request: Changes for Egress firewall rules feature support in SRX

> On April 8, 2013, 11:25 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource/JuniperSrxResource.java, > > line 830 > > > > > > What's these trafficType and guestVlan for? D

Re: [Discuss] API name alias

If we are still on our previously discussed plan (search a wiki shared by Min) on deprecating the whole query based API (Server), it's just unnecessary work on present APIs. I think for now just changing the name attribute type from String to String[] would just work, as John suggested. Adding oth

Using VMware dvSwitch in CloudStack for Review

Hi Ilya/ Sateesh Resending the doc . Here is the updated section on dvSwitch. Please see 8.3.7. Configuring a vSphere Cluster with VMware Distributed Virtual Switch (page no. 108) I also have the following doubts: Could you clarify what do you mean by Do not attempt to configure DVSwitch by a

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

It could be by chance. I've run a bunch of tests, however, and can no longer get it to choose incorrectly. Before, though, it was placing both VMs on the same PS and each should have been on a different one. I can't see anything different in my config then versus now. I'm still trying to repro

RE: [Discuss] API name alias

What happens when same alias gets used for different commands? I think even with the current mechanism for command name the problem exists i.e. two different commands can have the same name. And in that case how is it handled? > -Original Message- > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.ka

RE: [QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: Source NAT on Private Gateway Feature in n-Tier

Hi Chandan, I gone through the test cases. Good number of test cases are covered on configuration of Source NAT on Private gateway. Please add some more test cases to test Source NAT functionality for VM traffic. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Chandan Purushothama > Sent

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

You might want to speak to Infra about it first. On 9 April 2013 00:34, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:05 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUS

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Could it just be that it occasionally chooses the right storage by chance? On Apr 8, 2013 8:36 PM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: > If you are seeing the tags honored sometimes then I guess this might be > related to ordering of allocators. > > Kelven, is your fix to maintain the order in which allocators

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

If you are seeing the tags honored sometimes then I guess this might be related to ordering of allocators. Kelven, is your fix to maintain the order in which allocators are loaded, in 4.1 as well? Prachi On Apr 8, 2013, at 6:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Yeah, that dawned on me later,

RE: [Discuss] API name alias

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 3:19 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss] API name alias > > > > On 4/8/13 11:18 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > > >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM, John

Re: [DISCUSS] pause VM

Perhaps. I think there are separate issues here. There is volume snapshot and vm snapshot. If the hypervisor is capable of making volumes consistent , but VM snapshot is more about saving running state, then the two may not serve the same purpose when leveraging san-based snapshots. Its absolutely

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Yeah, that dawned on me later, Marcus. :) I updated the Bug a couple hours ago to note that it might have been due to lack of memory (I had mentioned this issue in the Bug). That certainly is likely, in fact, since I'm running two XenServers in VMs on my laptop. :) It just didn't click right away t

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

By the way, the insufficient capacity in itself may not indicate storage space. It could be lack of memory or CPU as well. On Apr 8, 2013 2:48 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > I went ahead and logged Bug 1971 for this issue. > > Currently I cannot get the system to deploy to the correct primary stor

RE: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Min, Could you also include the details of the API changes (new parameters) that will be proposed as part of this feature? Also it would be helpful if you list the request and response parameters for the new API calls. For all the API calls that are being deprecated , is there any specific err

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1814: Add LXC documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10224/#review18826 --- Ship it! Committed to master. Looks good. Assuming this doesn't app

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1814: Add LXC documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10224/#review18825 --- Commit c522841716e77066f387410ca42d0e8132f96459 in branch refs/heads

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Sure, np. I've done a lot of Java development over the past ten years or so, but never used Spring before, so that's been a new experience for me. :) On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Any chance you could create a new page on the wiki + document your > exper

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1598: Convert "Global Configuration Settings" section to XML and add to Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10344/#review18821 --- Ship it! Reviewed + committed. Master: 301c683c099a568412f2db2ad24

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1598: Convert "Global Configuration Settings" section to XML and add to Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10344/#review18820 --- Commit b506a3fbe93feda4994cf5d78e50491b8da900d5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1598: Convert "Global Configuration Settings" section to XML and add to Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10344/#review18818 --- Commit 301c683c099a568412f2db2ad24a9bb8441951ca in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1598: Convert "Global Configuration Settings" section to XML and add to Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10344/#review18817 --- Commit 49b55f507daecb85ff3e068e537e4bb9a0d863a5 in branch refs/heads

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Hi Mike, Any chance you could create a new page on the wiki + document your experience here? I'm not sure that someone with a need to specify storage placement would hit on "Using Spring..." You're raising a good question here, would love to see it on the wiki. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier

Re: [DISCUSS] pause VM

On 4/8/13 4:19 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >Oh yes, I know these things, but here's my point. You said: > >"When CloudStack takes a snapshot of volume, it already utilizes snapshot >feature provided by hypervisor to allow taking point of time storage image >in a safe manner from operating syst

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-524) http proxy used by ssvm (secstorage.proxy) NOT working

Chip, Would it be possible to commit this patch to 4.1, this feature has been broken for 3.x and 4.x. Would be nice to have it working in 4.1. Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 8:10 PM

RE: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

Yes, we don't allow admin to shrink a guest VLAN range. The 2 scenarios I mentioned are negative test cases that need to be handled. Thank you, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Pranav Saxena >Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 4:35 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Likitha Shetty; Abhinanda

[DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Hi All, Currently CloudStack does not offer a flexible pluggable framework for users to easily integrate and configure any 3rd-party object stores for such backup services as registering templates, taking snapshots, etc. Along with Edison's recent refactored storage subsystem 2.0 that mainly re

RE: UI flow to create Private Gateways to a VPC

Hey Chandan, This is how you need to navigate - Networks -> VPC -> Configure -> Private Gateway in the Drop down -> Add private Gateway button on the top right hand corner Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Tue

RE: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

The FS says that the feature only deals with extending the VLAN range when calling the update physical network API with the new VLAN range parameter . So , why would shrinking a VLAN range be a valid use case for it ? When you have already given a VLAN Range which when gets exhausted calls the n

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

> -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:05 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging > > > > On 4/8/13 1:32 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > wrote: > >

RE: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Thanks Alena, Added the mentioned test case to the test plan, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 3:38 PM To: Chandan Purushothama; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Regarding "Blacklist o

Re: Review Request: Changes for Egress firewall rules feature support in SRX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/#review18804 --- plugins/network-elements/juniper-srx/src/com/cloud/network/resource

Re: [DISCUSS] pause VM

Oh yes, I know these things, but here's my point. You said: "When CloudStack takes a snapshot of volume, it already utilizes snapshot feature provided by hypervisor to allow taking point of time storage image in a safe manner from operating system point of view." What about five volumes? Can we e

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

On restart, we will find host applying all the rules through planners. If last host does not fit the rules, another host can get chosen as long as volume can be reused/migrated. Else restart will fail - but it fails because the Admin made a conscious decision of migrating it without honoring the

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

1 follow up question : 2) And #66 Live migration - Live migration of Vms which are associated with anti-affinity group failing - The live migration will still succeed since it is Admin's choice to use host2 even if it is not suitable. We just indicate if the host is suitable or not, but CS shoul

RE: [BUG][ACS41][CLOUD-INIT] cloud-init 0.7.2 is not able to pull metadata from cloudstack

John, Please register with JIRA and create an issue. I will assign the issue to you. Then we need to create a review board request, someone will approve and push it in. Regards ilya > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 08,

Re: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Although there is no harm in keeping this parameter for Basic zone as we don't do any verification against it, I might disable its update on the API level when the zone is Basic. You should add a test case for that. -Alena. On 4/8/13 3:24 PM, "Chandan Purushothama" wrote: >Thanks Alena, > >Do y

How many Private Gateways can be created to a VPC?

Hello Kishan, I referred to the Information present at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+more+than+one+Private+GW+to+a+VPC . It doesn't mention any limitations pertaining to how many private gateways can be created to a VPC. May I know the limitation for this feature,

UI flow to create Private Gateways to a VPC

Hello Brian, I referred to the Information present at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Add+more+than+one+Private+GW+to+a+VPC and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-767 . I didn't see any information pertaining to how to use this feature via the UI. May I know

RE: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Thanks Alena, Do you prevent the execution of updateZoneLevelParameters API with "blacklistedRoutes" parameter on a Basic Zone? If No, then will an accidental execution of this API on a Basic Zone have any bad consequences on any functionality in the zone? Thank you, Chandan. -Original Me

Re: [DISCUSS] pause VM

On 4/8/13 1:39 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >Has anyone put together a suggestion for adding a 'paused' state to >virtual >machines? Or is anyone working on it? This seems fairly straightforward, >and I think we may need the functionality going forward. Even if people >rarely use it themselves,

Re: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

You have to specify the new list of the blacklisted routes excluding the one you want to drop. For example: 1) updateZoneLevelParameters&zoneId=1&blacklistedRoutes=10.1.1.0/24,10.1.2.0/2 4 2) if you want to drop the last route from the black list, execute: updateZoneLevelParameters&zoneId=1&bla

RE: [QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: Blacklist of Routes Feature in n-Tier

Hello Alena, Please review the test plan for feature "Blacklist of Routes" and let me know the review comments. The test cases are mentioned in an excel sheet attached to the page. Test Plan : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2.6+Bla

RE: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Thanks Alena, After I specify a list of black listed route CIDRs, how can I remove one of the CIDRs from the list without disturbing the rest of the CIDRs in the list, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:23 PM To: Chandan Purush

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

[INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud SUCCESS [0.655s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM SUCCESS [0.295s] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ---

Re: [Discuss] API name alias

On 4/8/13 11:18 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM, John Burwell wrote: > >> Rohit, >> >> Why would we need to rewrite any Java code to switch to an array? As I >> mentioned, array annotation values are treated as varargs. Therefore, >> annotations with single values ca

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

you did see my previous email before the one about the error correct? or am i hunting down the right path here, or heading off into complete and vastly unkown territory not yet explored On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Sorry about that. I s

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

so clone quickcloud2 ??? On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in > order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out? > > > On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrot

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/#review18795 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

Can you (re)start this discussion with the appropriate subject line On 4/5/13 5:29 AM, "Simon Waterhouse" wrote: >The "official" location is pending a decision by the community what to do >with this code. > >Citrix would like to contribute it to the CloudStack project - having a >ready-made .NE

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Sorry about that. I switched to the quickcloud2 branch last Friday in order to get a clean patch on master. Can you try that one out? On 4/8/13 2:21 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Can you post your build e

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

Thank you for the review comments Prachi. For the test cases relating to UpdateVMAffinityGroup() , I will add the testcases where the Vm cannot be started on the last host on which it was running before being stopped. For live migration test case , I will update the expected result as per the

Re: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

On 4/8/13 2:18 PM, "Chandan Purushothama" wrote: >Thanks for the Information Alena, > >May I know the information for the following questions pertaining to the >feature: > >1. Format of Specified Black Listed Routes: In the FS, it is mentioned >that we specify the routes as "10.10.10.0/24,172.16.

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ? > Here ya go! :) didnt know it existed http://paste.cloudstack.org/kqi0/

RE: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Thanks for the Information Alena, May I know the information for the following questions pertaining to the feature: 1. Format of Specified Black Listed Routes: In the FS, it is mentioned that we specify the routes as "10.10.10.0/24,172.16.1.0/24". Do you parse the network information using the

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On 4/8/13 1:32 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > >> >> I also wanted to find out how do other projects get through resolving >>blocker >> bugs sooner? >> >> [1] >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Current+Maintainer >> s+Per+Component >> >[Animesh>] Folks I wanted to

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1598: Convert "Global Configuration Settings" section to XML and add to Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10344/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jessica Tomechak. Description --- CLOUDS

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Can you post your build error on paste.cloudstack.org ? From: Outback Dingo mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Sunday, April 7, 2013 12:01 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

The check will be done only on createStaticRoute command execution. -Alena. On 4/8/13 1:53 PM, "Chandan Purushothama" wrote: >Hello Alena, > >Do you check for the black listed route only when createStaticRoute >command is executed? Is the check made as a part of any other action on >the setup?

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

Hi Sangeetha, The test plan looks fine. A few comments 1) UpdateVMAffinityGroup API - We should add to the testcases, the scenario where an already existing VM say on host1, is updated to have affinity group A1 that asks to avoid host1. In this case, the VM cannot restart on host1, but should

RE: Regarding "Blacklist of Routes" Feature of nTier Apps 2.0

Hello Alena, Do you check for the black listed route only when createStaticRoute command is executed? Is the check made as a part of any other action on the setup? Kindly let me know, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix

Re: [BUG][ACS41][CLOUD-INIT] cloud-init 0.7.2 is not able to pull metadata from cloudstack

Can you file a bug and submit a patch with the fix? Thanks for the report! On Apr 8, 2013, at 4:47 PM, "Yi, John" wrote: > CLOUD-INIT 0.7.2 is using a boto library which hardcodes part of the path for > getting the metadata for a VM instance. One fix is to add the following rules > to the rou

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

I went ahead and logged Bug 1971 for this issue. Currently I cannot get the system to deploy to the correct primary storage and it claims to run out of space when deploying a third VM: INFO [user.vm.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-19:job-19) com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Un

[BUG][ACS41][CLOUD-INIT] cloud-init 0.7.2 is not able to pull metadata from cloudstack

CLOUD-INIT 0.7.2 is using a boto library which hardcodes part of the path for getting the metadata for a VM instance. One fix is to add the following rules to the routervm’s docroot /var/www/html/latest/.htaccess: RewriteRule ^meta-data/$ ../metadata/%{REMOTE_ADDR}/meta-data [L,NC,QSA] RewriteRu

Question about deleting Primary Storage

Hi, I noticed when you use the PreSetup option while creating Primary Storage based on a pre-existent storage repository in XenServer that deleting the Primary Storage leads to CloudStack automatically deleting the storage repository on XenServer. Is this the desired behavior? Since the user had

[DISCUSS] pause VM

Has anyone put together a suggestion for adding a 'paused' state to virtual machines? Or is anyone working on it? This seems fairly straightforward, and I think we may need the functionality going forward. Even if people rarely use it themselves, if storage solutions are going to offer snapshots th

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:46 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Will Chan

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1868) GetVmStatsCommand throws NullPointerException with VMWare

Francois, I've raised this issue in past, it appears it's going to be resolved with CLOUDSTACK-669 - hopefully in 4.2 release. Kelven mentioned he began the work on this feature, please review the contents of ISSUE 669, there are other features VMWARE that may benefit with better VM SYNC. Re

CloudStack Social Media Accounts

Hi all, We're working on consolidating all the social media accounts, and have set up the existing CloudStack accounts for Twitter, Facebook, etc. in HootSuite. (e.g., @cloudstack on Twitter, the Facebook page). If you have created a CloudStack social media handle outside the "main" one, please d

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Hey guys, In nonossComponentContext.xml.in, I see the following for storage allocators: On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Actually, now that I know to look for "componentContext.xml" and not > "components.xml

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Actually, now that I know to look for "componentContext.xml" and not "components.xml," I found this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+CloudStack On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I wrote that last

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

I wrote that last filename incorrect (I meant one nonossComponentContext.xml.in). On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, guys! > > I do see componentContext.xml. > > Not to be too much of a pain here :) (I looked for this on the Wiki and

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

Thanks, guys! I do see componentContext.xml. Not to be too much of a pain here :) (I looked for this on the Wiki and couldn't find relevant info), but I have three componentContext.xml files, one componentContext.xml.in file, three nonossComponentContext.xml files, and one nonComponentContext.xml

RE: [QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: Source NAT on Private Gateway Feature in n-Tier

Hello Jayapal, Kindly let me know when is the best time for you to come on IRC to ask me any questions that you might have pertaining to the Test Plan, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, April 05, 201

Re: VM deployed to wrong storage repository

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:19:48PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > FYI that the closest I find are both called migration-components.xml (2 of > them). > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've never modified this file bef

Re: [MERGE] affinity_groups branch to master

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:57 PM, prasanna wrote: > On 6 April 2013 05:56, Prachi Damle wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I would like to merge the Affinity/Anti-Affinity feature developed in >> affinity_groups branch to master. >> >> >> >> - Functional Specs for this feature can be found here

RE: [MERGE] affinity_groups branch to master

Prasanna, Its related! Fixed it in the branch Thanks, -Prachi -Original Message- From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of prasanna Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 10:58 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [MERGE] affinity_groups branch

Re: [Discuss] API name alias

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Rohit, > > Why would we need to rewrite any Java code to switch to an array? As I > mentioned, array annotation values are treated as varargs. Therefore, > annotations with single values can be left alone. Only cases where > multiple values

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

Thanks a lot , that's def the way i was thinking this works. I'll be working with it , I'll let you know. Thanks On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:38:24PM -0500, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > > I think I'm getting it wrong tho , if i want to use VXL

Re: [MERGE] affinity_groups branch to master

On 6 April 2013 05:56, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I would like to merge the Affinity/Anti-Affinity feature developed in > affinity_groups branch to master. > > > > - Functional Specs for this feature can be found here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:42:57PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > > > CLOUDSTACK-1929 ASF 4.1 cloudstack agent fail to install in KVM host CENTOS > > 6.3 OS: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-3.295.el6.10.x86_64 requires > > libusbredirparser.so.0 Fang Wang > > Fang, Any ETA on a fix? > > > > This looks inval

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:38:24PM -0500, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > I think I'm getting it wrong tho , if i want to use VXLANS , i would be > replacing "bridges" with nexus 1000v right and not the default virtual > router. > > It's got to be layer 2 inide a layer 3 udp packet .. , therefore it's g

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

> > CLOUDSTACK-1929 ASF 4.1 cloudstack agent fail to install in KVM host CENTOS > 6.3 OS: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-3.295.el6.10.x86_64 requires libusbredirparser.so.0 > Fang Wang > Fang, Any ETA on a fix? > This looks invalid to me and caused by polluting the yum repo that is being used for CloudStac

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:06:21AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 09:21 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > Docs: Joe's working on release notes. Joe, do you have an update on when > > you think we will be in a position to call it "done"? > > I'll try to get this done by EOD tom

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

I think I'm getting it wrong tho , if i want to use VXLANS , i would be replacing "bridges" with nexus 1000v right and not the default virtual router. It's got to be layer 2 inide a layer 3 udp packet .. , therefore it's got to be a switch or something like that . Thanks On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

KVM . Thanks On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:47:03AM -0500, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Sounds , good , but I'm not trying to use ESX , do you have any doc of > > how to replace a default system vm template? > > > > I have the qcow

RE: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-1967) Maintenance mode not fully working with VMWare

++Kelven Yang, Francois, I would ask if this behavior is by design. Especially if the environment is shared with non CS VMs. CS maintenance mode does not exactly imply VMWARE maintenance mode. If we can ask for enhancement where there is an explicit rule that says - this hypervisor is exclus

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:47:03AM -0500, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > Hi. > > Sounds , good , but I'm not trying to use ESX , do you have any doc of > how to replace a default system vm template? > > I have the qcow for the nexus 1000v , i guess the vrouter template is > downloaded by the seconda

Re: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

Hi. Sounds , good , but I'm not trying to use ESX , do you have any doc of how to replace a default system vm template? I have the qcow for the nexus 1000v , i guess the vrouter template is downloaded by the secondary storage from somewhere? Thanks! On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Koushik

RE: VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

Currently VXLAN as an isolation mechanism using nexus 1000v is marked as an open item in [1]. If you are interested in doing it please feel free to pick it up. You have to implement a network guru for handling VXLAN. Refer to the existing VLAN implementation for details. -Koushik [1] https://c

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 09:21 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Specific questions below for: Sateesh, Murali, Wido, Hugo, Joe. > > Here's the list. Please jump on issues that are unassigned, and if you > are assigned *please* try to wrap up as quickly as possible. > > DEB Packaging: Wido noted that he

VXLANs and Cisco Nexus 1000v

Hi List. We're looking to implement VXLANS and we would like to do so using the 1000v from cisco. Has anybody done something similar , or is there any documentation on how to use your own custom vrouters? Thanks

  1   2   >