Re: Master broken

Ah - misunderstood. Like Hugo said, a test that fails on presence of db connection should solve this. But I hope ppl will turn mysql on (as an additional step) to run the bvt. Or better yet, I can look into those db tests and port them as marvin tests. -- Prasanna., - Original Message -

Re: Review Request: Improvement CLOUDSTACK-1875: add JSON output to cloudmonkey

On Apr 6, 2013 4:24 AM, "Justin Grudzien" wrote: > > If anyone is allowed to update the wiki I can do so as I go along. Yes, edit the wikis boldly, everyone is encouraged. > > One thing to note. Because we effectively removed tabularize and you removed my appending the display attribute to the c

Re: Client Redirection

Hi, just set it up in DNS. CloudStack operates on a port (8080) so no matter the ip or domain name, you can access it on that port Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2013, at 8:31 PM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Hello again, > > I have a domain that I would like to utilize for the > http://1.2.3.4:8

Client Redirection

Hello again, I have a domain that I would like to utilize for the http://1.2.3.4:8080/client -- I do not wish to continue to use the IP address. I am having trouble finding document ion on how or where to utilize a custom domain name. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated Maurice

Windows 2012

Greetings, I am attempting to setup an instance with Windows 2012. However, it seems as though Cloud Stack OR my ISO is not seeing the virtual drive. I have not had any issues loading two instance of window 2008. Please advise. - Maurice

[QA][PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Test plan review: Source NAT on Private Gateway Feature in n-Tier

Hello Jayapal, Please review the test plan for feature "Source NAT on Private Gateway Feature" and let me know the review comments. The test cases are mentioned in an excel sheet attached to the page. Test Plan : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

Chip, Please go ahead to apply my patch first. I couldn't find MidoNet Network Guru in 4.1 branch, I think it's better for Hugo to apply his fix on top of my patch on 4.1 directly Kelven On 4/5/13 11:25 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:47:39AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >>

Re: Review Request: Improvement CLOUDSTACK-1875: add JSON output to cloudmonkey

If anyone is allowed to update the wiki I can do so as I go along. One thing to note. Because we effectively removed tabularize and you removed my appending the display attribute to the config if it didn't exist we have created a user experience which will not be seamless when they upgrade. I

[MERGE] QuickCloud

Design doc here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud Discussion: http://markmail.org/thread/467rgl6cjmuhtokk Branch:quickcloud2 Jira id: CLOUDSTACK-1813 Database changes: NetworkManager will automatically add a QuickCloud network offering that has no services Unit

RE: How to dramatically reduce the build time:)

Thanks for you feedback, here is an updated one: mvn -pl `git status --porcelain |sed -n '/\/src/p'| awk '{print $2}' |sed 's/\/src/$/'|cut -d $ -f 1|uniq |tr "\n" "," |sed 's/,$/,client/'` clean install Which will be more actuate in detecting changes in maven java projects. > -Original Mess

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/ --- (Updated April 5, 2013, 10:22 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

> On April 5, 2013, 5:46 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > As long as we have query based API, the overall base64 encoded payload in > > the url cannot exceed this limit as per a RFC (I recall discussing this > > issue on ML when I applied this feature from previous ports). > > If we handle POST req

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

> On April 5, 2013, 4:03 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > Is there any automated testing of this feature today? Marvin tests of the > > HTTP service? Unit tests? > > > > If not, now seems like a good time to add some. I realize you are just > > updating the size of the data field, but IMO we

Re: Master broken

Sent from my iPhone On 5 apr. 2013, at 23:21, "Alex Huang" wrote: >> That will be hard to do since the checkin test requires the DB to be present >> as >> it starts up the server and sets-up the databases. We'd have to turn it off >> for >> the build and turn it back on again for the bvt. Be

RE: [EDU] CloudStack University

+1 --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 9:45 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EDU] CloudStack University > > I second the notion for an edu@ mailing list as this is a distinct facet of > the >

RE: Master broken

> That will be hard to do since the checkin test requires the DB to be present > as > it starts up the server and sets-up the databases. We'd have to turn it off > for > the build and turn it back on again for the bvt. Best if we avoid doing - > DskipTests when building as a general good rule. I

Re: 4.1 packaging failed

Thanks a lot! On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Hugo Trippaers < htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > You should be able to get them from jenkins.cloudstack.org. Just navigate > to the 4.1 rpm build job and download the artifacts. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 5 apr. 2013,

Re: 4.1 packaging failed

You should be able to get them from jenkins.cloudstack.org. Just navigate to the 4.1 rpm build job and download the artifacts. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 5 apr. 2013, at 20:51, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote: > Is it possible to download these rpms from somewhere in jenkins? > > Thanks!

Re: 4.1 packaging failed

Is it possible to download these rpms from somewhere in jenkins? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:00 PM, prasanna wrote: > Hugo fixed this already: the latest packages have been passing > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/package-rhel63-4.1/30/ > > On 5 April 2013 23:27, Rayees Namathponnan >

RE: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

Indeed, Nicira components are completely open source so should be in the standard version. Same goes for midonet components. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: vrijdag 5 april 2013 20:26 > To: Kelven Yang > Cc: Hugo Tripp

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:47:39AM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > For some reason, the diff in the ticket about your change does not show up > Nicira, MidoNet Network Guru. > On quick question to confirm, Nicira/MidoNet are supposed to be available > in non-OSS build, is that correct? IIRC they are n

Re: 4.1 packaging failed

Hugo fixed this already: the latest packages have been passing http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/package-rhel63-4.1/30/ On 5 April 2013 23:27, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > 4.1 packaging failed, is it due below check in ? > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=

4.1 packaging failed

Hi Hugo, 4.1 packaging failed, is it due below check in ? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=7cbd8f581f7f42cca056b82ed7cbfce8aebf974f Packaging failed with below error Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <=

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

Never mind, I found it in master. Chip, I'll put another patch to the same review ticket. Kelven On 4/5/13 10:47 AM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >For some reason, the diff in the ticket about your change does not show up >Nicira, MidoNet Network Guru. >On quick question to confirm, Nicira/MidoNet are

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

For some reason, the diff in the ticket about your change does not show up Nicira, MidoNet Network Guru. On quick question to confirm, Nicira/MidoNet are supposed to be available in non-OSS build, is that correct? Kelven On 4/5/13 5:35 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote: >Hey Kelven, > >I commented on

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/#review18713 --- As long as we have query based API, the overall base64 encoded paylo

Re: Review Request: Improvement CLOUDSTACK-1875: add JSON output to cloudmonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10275/#review18712 --- We will deprecate and remove self.tabular and let's call the display

Re: Review Request: Improvement CLOUDSTACK-1875: add JSON output to cloudmonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10275/#review18710 --- Commit c75b11d13a49065554d492d5ed2fafc6bff9493e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: Improvement CLOUDSTACK-1875: add JSON output to cloudmonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10275/#review18709 --- Code is not pep8 compliant. Anyway, I'll apply the patch as the issu

Re: Review Request: Cloudmonkey requester.py change to return clearer errors and implement a logic change for async calls.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10151/#review18708 --- Ship it! Thanks Funs, forgot to apply it on master after I came bac

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/#review18706 --- Kelven, I'll wait to hear that you've addressed the issues that Hug

Re: [DISCUSS] Component/Plugin development guidelines (Spring)

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > I've got a few questions on how to enable a new component in > componentContext.xml/nonossComponentContext.xml or applicationContext.xml, > I've updated wiki > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+Cl

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

Bumping this. Any ideas? On Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 03:33 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > So - the build process for generating API docs has changed since 4.0 -> > 4.1, and it looks like in the process we've stopped generating a > "diff.txt" of APIs changed/added/deleted since the last vers

Re: April board report

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:03:27PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Looks like good info, Chip. This would make a good public project update. > But perhaps this is a little wordy for a board report. Is there a way we > can compress this? Perhaps cutting out any secondary or tertiary detail. > The board

Re: April board report

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013, at 09:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Can everyone take a look please? Made a few small edits for grammar, looks good. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: Review Request: Remove 2k limitation for user data on a deployVMCmd issued as an HTTP POST request

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/#review18704 --- Is there any automated testing of this feature today? Marvin tests

Re: Mirror for the 4.0 and 4.1 SystemVM

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi all, > > I mirrored the SystemVM ISO to my CloudStack DEB/RPM repository in the > Netherlands. > > Downloading from cloud.com is kind of slow here in Europe, I'm > downloading with about 350KB/sec so I figured I'd mirror it. > >

Re: Review Request: Removed region_id column from cloud_usage db account table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10298/#review18703 --- Ship it! commit 05ca08af1166d40a3e0708004789e30c3a11659e Author: Ki

Mirror for the 4.0 and 4.1 SystemVM

Hi all, I mirrored the SystemVM ISO to my CloudStack DEB/RPM repository in the Netherlands. Downloading from cloud.com is kind of slow here in Europe, I'm downloading with about 350KB/sec so I figured I'd mirror it. Not sure if we want to update the docs for this as the plan is to change t

Re: [EDU] CloudStack University

hi Sebastian, I'm very interesting in working with Xen XCP. I have played with XCP for one year. I would like to work on student project: GSoC: Add Xen/XCP support for GRE SDN controller. Let me know how can I join this team? Thank you so much. 2013/4/5 Kelceydamage@bbits > I second the noti

Re: April board report

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:03:27PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Looks like good info, Chip. This would make a good public project update. > But perhaps this is a little wordy for a board report. Is there a way we > can compress this? Perhaps cutting out any secondary or tertiary detail. > The board

Re: April board report

Looks like good info, Chip. This would make a good public project update. But perhaps this is a little wordy for a board report. Is there a way we can compress this? Perhaps cutting out any secondary or tertiary detail. The board typically review about 40 reports per month, I think? So there's a lo

April board report

Hi all, I have to submit our board report by Wed of next week, so I drafted a version here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2013-04+Board+Report+for+Apache+CloudStack Can everyone take a look please? For information about what's expected, and what's not wanted, please see:

Re: [DOCS] More OSS writers needed

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 07:06 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > One way the community could help is by making sure the "How to Contribute > to Docs" part of our wiki is a great as it can be.[1] I feel like our > docs > process is pretty straightforward and well explained, witness that > several > cont

Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

On 4 April 2013 10:40, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > Test cases for " Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" is posted here - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+Paln+for+Affinity-Anti-affinity+Rules. > > > > Reference FS: - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDST

RE: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

Hey Kelven, I commented on your patch on the review board. Can you modify the patch so all Nicira and MidoNet stuff is also in? I fixed master so you should be able to use that. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > Ke

RE: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

The "official" location is pending a decision by the community what to do with this code. Citrix would like to contribute it to the CloudStack project - having a ready-made .NET client for the CloudStack API is surely an advantage for us - anyone have thoughts on where it should live in the lo

RE: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

Thanks for upgrading the .NET SDK I created :) Will this be the official public location? > -Original Message- > From: Simon Waterhouse > Sent: 05 April 2013 9:34 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Donal Lafferty; Pranav Saxena > Subject: RE: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

Re: Review Request: Finalize componentContext.xml/nonComponentContext.xml content organization to be plugin friendly

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/#review18696 --- client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in

RE: Review request for storage motion on xenserver

Hi Edison, Thanks a lot for looking at the changes. I am going through your feedback and working on a patch which addresses your review comments. I'll get back to you if I have any queries. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Th

RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1

Hi Alex, Thanks for looking at the changes. 1. I'll make the changes to have a separate response object for finding hosts and storage pools for migration. I'll also rename the apis to be called as findHostsForMigration and findStoragePoolsForMigration. 2. Why a separate api for migrating a vm

[UI-MERGED] scaleupvm functionality branch to master

I have merged my code into master for providing UI support for this feature . Request the QA and docs team to pick this feature for their respective tasks. Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 1:06 AM To

Re: Master broken

On 4 April 2013 05:15, Alex Huang wrote: > Prasanna, > > This is actually a very interesting case. In our check-in test, is there any > way for us to disable db access when running the unit tests? I can see that > this would be one of the things that the developer can easily forget but hits >

Re: [DOCS] More OSS writers needed

On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:53:51PM +, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: >>> My two cents >>> >>> We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market >> CloudStack.

Review Request: Removed region_id column from cloud_usage db account table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10298/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Removed r

Re: Plugin woes...

Good we discussed this issue. Let's make a habit to update the wikis as we push changes around specific components especially APIs, plugins. Cheers. On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Kelven Yang wrote: > I updated following wiki to help clarify some of confusions in this area > > https://cwiki.a

RE: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

This should work whichever authenticator is used behind the logon API (LDAP , MD5 etc.), but I didn't test the LDAP auth. yet... -Original Message- From: Simon Waterhouse [mailto:simon.waterho...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: 05 April 2013 09:27 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Donal Lafferty S

RE: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism

The CloudStack .NET SDK at https://github.com/siwater/cloudstack_dotnetsdk has support for both user name/password and apiKey/secretKey authentication. -Original Message- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] Sent: 04 April 2013 17:51 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: c