I updated following wiki to help clarify some of confusions in this area
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+Clou
dStack
Kelven
On 4/4/13 8:45 PM, "Ryan Dietrich" wrote:
>I went ahead and updated the wiki with an example. Feel free to
>add/remove/edit what
I've got a few questions on how to enable a new component in
componentContext.xml/nonossComponentContext.xml or applicationContext.xml, I've
updated wiki
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Using+Spring+in+CloudStack.
Hope it help clarify some of the confusions
Kelven
I second the notion for an edu@ mailing list as this is a distinct facet of the
CloudStack ecosystem much like marketing.
It would be awesome if we could all pull together enough content to hard launch
it at the next CloudStack conference. Even if it's just the basic 101 modules.
Sent from my i
Hi Sebastian,
I would like to take up the work of the student project:
GSoC: Add Xen/XCP support for GRE SDN controller
but before that I will have to go through courses.
Kindly let me know on how to go forward on this.
Regards,
RK
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
> SEb
Hi All,
Thanks for the clarification.
I am not going to stifle myself for one particular technology, it is just
that I got confused.
But you guys have clarified it in the posts. :).
Regards,
RK
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:44 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Chip Childe
I went ahead and updated the wiki with an example. Feel free to
add/remove/edit what I've written.
-Ryan Dietrich
On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> We removed auto-scanning recently and we need to update related
> documentation as well on guidelines to program components and ad
SEbastian
I work almost fulltime for education program related to ICT, in Cloud and
Java, called JENI. www.jeni-academy.org
I love to join this work.
will we have e...@cloudstack.apache.org for this mailing list.
I am waiting the next step for this.
F
--
Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
Shadow Master and
Hey guys,
I'm listed to do Enterprise Storage and plan to have something prepared
maybe toward the end of the month or early in May (I'm full throttled on
another set of tasks at the moment, so probably wont' have time for a few
weeks).
Talk to you later!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kelcey
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Hugo Trippaers, Kelven Yang, and
M
We removed auto-scanning recently and we need to update related
documentation as well on guidelines to program components and add/enable a
plugin into CloudStack. I'll update the wiki accordingly soon
Kelven
On 4/4/13 2:50 PM, "Ryan Dietrich" wrote:
>Ok, it works now. I just had to add:
>
> c
> I am not saying RESTful API will solve everything, but the follow the RESTful
> paradigm may help to clean up the APIs.
> For example, we have AddHostCmd and CreateStoragePoolCmd, the
> verb(Add and Create) may cause confusion. While if using RESTful API, POST
> is the well defined verb for this
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents
>
> > We made a messy cloudstack API already, and it's hard to get rid of
> > it, as
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:53:51PM +, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> > My two cents
> >
> > We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
> >
> > The other w
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> > > We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
> >
> > Ideally something that actually giv
> We made a messy cloudstack API already, and it's hard to get rid of it, as a
> lot
> of clients((UI/marvin/jcloud, other cloudstack bindings)) are using this APIs
> already.
> We shouldn't make the mistake again, assuming that only AgentManager will
> use this agent APIs.
>
First, I don't thin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10292/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
With remo
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents
>
> That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but
> t
Donal,
> 1. How are API calls authenticated and authorized if they are not signed with
> API keys?
API calls are authenticated and authorized by sessionkey returned by login API.
When logging in to cloudstack UI, cloudstack UI passes
userName/password/domainName to login API, then login API re
Test Results for SHA-256 as Default Algorithm.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SHA-256+Salted+as+default+Algorithm+for+Passwords
...Parth
Ok, it works now. I just had to add:
to client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in
I'll wait for Kelven to update the xml in 4.1, and then I'll pretty up my
example plugin and update the wiki.
Thank you all for your assistance.
-Ryan Dietrich
On Apr 4, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Alex Huang wro
Test Results for SHA-256 as Default Algorithm.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SHA-256+Salted+as+default+Algorithm+for+Passwords
...Parth
This is amazing!!! Reduced build time for me, from 6:45.917s to 1:28.435s
Thanks Edison!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a
> way may help you a little bit to build cloudstack as quick as possible:
> mvn -pl
Chiradeep pointed to the upgrade instructions for 4.0.1, but I'm not seeing
an obvious indication of how the system VM upgrades are supposed to work.
The instructions tell you to register the new system vm as a template, and
then later in the procedure you restart the system VMs. I don't see:
1)
I have some material I could fashion into a course on advanced networking.
Let me get that rolling.
-kd
>-Original Message-
>From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:27 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject:
Ryan,
I believe it's something Kelven added recently. Auto-Scanning via @Component
has been disabled. There are numerous reasons why auto-scanning is bad. Take
for example the case of someone extending a component with the @Component
annotation, they don't want to modify the parent class at
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> You said that you didn't know if it was needed in release notes.
>> RN is a completely different type of document than the guides.
>
> Well, what I meant was I didn't know if it was nee
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> You said that you didn't know if it was needed in release notes.
> RN is a completely different type of document than the guides.
Well, what I meant was I didn't know if it was needed in the release
notes vs. other guides - if it's going to o
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> My personal thoughts - we should be using Feedback.xml in the brand
>> rather than one-off sections like this.
>> That allows us to have one piece of common content - and turn it on
>>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> My personal thoughts - we should be using Feedback.xml in the brand
> rather than one-off sections like this.
> That allows us to have one piece of common content - and turn it on
> and off as appropriate per the document.
That sounds like a
Done :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1941
On 2013-04-04 4:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
I agree with you... the ui should allow you to delete the 'other'
admins :) I'd file it.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Francois Gaudreault
mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
I had this working yesterday and never touched componentContext.xml
… I did a git pull this morning, and everything broke. I'm going off the
current documentation and some notes that Rohit++ sent me.
The current documentation does not mention anything about componentContext.xml:
https://cwiki.ap
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1940
Thank you all.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Thanks for the help .
>
> I'll be trying to fill a bug about this today/tomorrow.
>
> Thanks Again
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers
> wro
I was told that if I used:
@Component
on the object that extended PluggableService I did not have to add it to
componentsContext.xml ..
Side note, given that I'm using Jetty, does that even get touched? (it's in a
tomcat client configuration directory)
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Alex Huang
I have organized the componentContext.xml to be in plugin friendly style,
I'll add a updated document for this as well. will commit to 4.1 today
Kelven
On 4/4/13 1:24 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>Ryan,
>
>Did you add it to componentscontext.xml?
>
>--Alex
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ry
I agree with you... the ui should allow you to delete the 'other' admins :)
I'd file it.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Francois Gaudreault <
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> Before posting a bug for this issue...
>
> Using 4.1, we added some users in the default admin account, and now we
> c
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So working on the Release Notes, I notice that our first section is on
> "Submitting Feedback and Getting Help." It *looks* like this has carried
> over a tradition from Cloud.com/Citrix docs. Looking at the Release
> Notes from
Ryan,
Did you add it to componentscontext.xml?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Plugin woes...
>
> Oh, I should mention I did this on the 4.1 branch.
>
Before posting a bug for this issue...
Using 4.1, we added some users in the default admin account, and now we
cannot delete them from the UI. Do we have to delete them using the
API/DB? UI should permit that isn't it (at least for the non default
admin user)? :P
--
Francois Gaudreault
Archi
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:09 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Job-Executor workers
>
> Jeronimo,
>
> Do you mind filing a bug for this?
>
> There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our
> product
+1!
Why write it if people can't use it!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [PROPOSAL][DOCS] Revise FS Before Features Land
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on some
Oh, I should mention I did this on the 4.1 branch.
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Ryan Dietrich wrote:
> I have written a test plugin, but it is not being picked up by spring.
>
> Specifically, I am looking at ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl.java
>
>@Inject protected List _services = null;
> My newly
Hi All.
Thanks for the help .
I'll be trying to fill a bug about this today/tomorrow.
Thanks Again
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> > Jeronimo,
> >
> > Do you mind filing a bug for this?
> >
> > There's some l
Hey all,
Following up on some previous discussions, I'd like to propose a slight
change of practice. (Some folks may already be doing this, in which case
- please carry on, and thanks!)
Currently we require an FS for new features, and developers have (AFAIK)
been great about creating an FS for co
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> Jeronimo,
>
> Do you mind filing a bug for this?
>
> There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our
> product. Back then, multiple commands executing on the same hypervisor was
> just not very reliable. Xe
Jeronimo,
Do you mind filing a bug for this?
There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our product.
Back then, multiple commands executing on the same hypervisor was just not
very reliable. Xen 3 would sometimes brick when multiple vm commands were
executed. I dou
It all depends on how the networks are setup. It can be completely done
outside of cloudstack so I don't think we should drive it into cloudstack
itself.
Permissions is one way to do it. Another would be to implement checks within
the ui itself.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From:
Hey all,
So working on the Release Notes, I notice that our first section is on
"Submitting Feedback and Getting Help." It *looks* like this has carried
over a tradition from Cloud.com/Citrix docs. Looking at the Release
Notes from CloudStack 2.2.14, it has a "contacting support" section.
So my q
Most of commands are executed in sequence at per-host scope, there will be
some concurrency when VMs are being deployed among different hosts.
However, for each individual orchestration flow, concurrency is usually
not in consideration in current code base.
Kelven
On 4/4/13 12:39 PM, "Jeronimo G
At first glance it seems like this would go into compute offering, perhaps
as a "max networks" setting. This could be checked on deployvm, add nic, or
any future additions.
You could alternatively do something with the design to leverage
permissions such that each account can only see one network,
Ok I'll rebuild and see the differences and wether we want to have this
live or not .
Thanks a lot for your help!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> No, it can't be updated using UI/WebServices APIs.
>
> I remember somebody in the dev list
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> > We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
>
> Ideally something that actually gives a "how to use this feature"
> bare-bones framework to write d
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
Ideally something that actually gives a "how to use this feature"
bare-bones framework to write docs off of. If the FS takes care of that,
that's fine - but I'm not sure t
No, it can't be updated using UI/WebServices APIs.
I remember somebody in the dev list mentioned that he modified
StartCommand.java with executeInSequence=false and tested it with KVM
hypervisor, and it worked for him. Not sure how concurrent starts (and how
many) are supported by other hypervisor
Devs, what do you think? :P
Should I open a feature request?
On 2013-04-04 3:13 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
I dont believe this exists in cloudstack today. You might need to
limit whats presented or reject api calls which request more than two
networks (something fronting cloudstack that parses t
Devdeep,
I was looking at this. A few comments.
- On open issues 3: It makes more sense to create a new response object for
your use. HostResponse really should be for listing hosts. Cramming a
storagemigraterequired flag in there makes it weird for other APIs. Others may
modify your respo
Hi.
I can see the override on *agent/api/StartCommand.java*
*
*
*@Override*
*public boolean executeInSequence() {*
* return true;
*
*}*
*
*
I'm guessing this can't be changed from the gui or api right?
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at
Thanks Alena, im checking that out now.
Chiradeep , I'm using the default centos template that comes with the
secondary storage sys vm.
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Note that each deployment to local storage has to download the
Note that each deployment to local storage has to download the base
template to local disk from secondary storage. How big is the template?
How fast is your secondary storage?
On 4/4/13 11:36 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote:
>Hi List.
>
>I'm having issues when deploying a big number of virtual mach
Hi Jeronimo,
The StartCommands for the Virtual machine are executed sequentially by the
agent. This behavior is set as "executeInSequence" flag on the command
level.
You might look at the Command abstract class (StartCommand extends it) to
see how it works. But basically if this flag is set to tr
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key except
Hi List.
I'm having issues when deploying a big number of virtual machines across a
number of nodes.
the imporession that i get ( from the logs) is that the AsyncJobExecutor is
pulling jobs from the queue and do them one by one (which when you are
deploying a big number of virtual machines could
Hi Everyone,
Some of you may know that I started CloudStack University at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+University
I just reworked the page to divide it into two categories:
-Courses
-Student Projects
I welcome any help with it, especially content for the cou
Just an update on this, as I ran into further issues. I'm going to change
the cpu mode in the xml to 'host-passthrough', and remove the machine type.
I had an issue with the machine type today after updating qemu/libvirt, it
was set to pc-1.0 and when I removed this option from the live xml, it wa
(moved to dev@)
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> To change the Passwords for ESXi try this procedure.
>
> To change host passwords the password must be changed on both the host and in
> the CloudStack database.
>
> ESXi
> 1. Connect to
Hey Donal,
Sorry , I should have responded you a bit earlier but had no access to email
today . Yeah you are absolutely right . UI uses Jsession ID to bypaas login
check something like this as shown below -
// Use this for checking the session, to bypass login screen
bypassLoginCheck: fu
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
>
> I guess to fix
On 04/04/13 9:51 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts
>>these
>> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
>> Since I added these os types in 40-410 i
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
>
> I guess to fix
I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
I guess to fix this we need to remove this os type from the template
instead of 40 to 410 up
Limited access from 4/22-4/28. Back 4/29.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 04 April 2013 4:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism
>
> On Thu, Apr 4,
On 04/04/13 7:23 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Donal Lafferty
>wrote:
>
>> I noticed that the CloudStack UI allows VM control to accounts that
>>don't
>> have an API key set defined.
>>
>> How does its authentication mechanism work? E.g.
>>
>>
>> 1.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> > Of Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: 04 April 2013 2:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> > S
We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 8:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] More OSS writers needed
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Chip Childer
Doo eet!
Ahmad
On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:54 PM, prasanna wrote:
>
>> On 3 April 2013 01:18, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> Awesome, thanks for your work Prasanna, do we have a jenkins job yet?
>> This one needs mysql db to be present. So i'll have to r
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> We discussed this in the March 20 IRC meeting [1] (see the "# 4. Active
> Feature
> Release: Docs Status #" section). If someone wants to propose this as a
> feature merge requirement, I'd +1 it. As long as we're not being too
> onerous abo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:06:21PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey Chip,
>
> This method used to be called from AgentManagerImpl, but it now uses the
> default constructor with Inject. So this method is no longer needed and I
> decided to remove it to avoid confusion. I dislike leaving constr
Chip,
Thanks for reverting.
-Abhi
On 04-Apr-2013, at 7:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> I've reverted that commit from 4.1.
>
> Abhi, please correct the change and commit to master. Please then
> provide either a Patch Request email for me to cherry-pick over to the
> 4.1 branch, or submit
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:53:51PM +, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> My two cents
>
> We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
>
> The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those wh
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
> wrote:
>
> > My two cents
> >
> > We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> > CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
> >
Yes, I will take a look.
On 04-Apr-2013, at 7:27 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> Abhi,
>
> Can you please review? This is now a blocker.
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Milamber wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 04/04/2013 05:51, aprat...@apache.org a ecrit :
>>
>>> Updated Branches:
>>> refs/heads
Hey Chip,
This method used to be called from AgentManagerImpl, but it now uses the
default constructor with Inject. So this method is no longer needed and I
decided to remove it to avoid confusion. I dislike leaving constructor and
methods around that are not used anymore as they tend to be unm
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:52:15PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hugo and I were on IRC today and he found
> f1259d50bdd6120174717f4cce6a45dc12b6645b
>
> I also noticed this on 4.1 and this fix seems to resolve it.
>
> There is no Jira ticket I could find and since Hugo isn't online
On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> My two cents
>
> We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
>
> The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those who
> are
My two cents
We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those who are
interested in writing. ..In the due course, both parties are mutually
ben
Hi,
Hugo and I were on IRC today and he found
f1259d50bdd6120174717f4cce6a45dc12b6645b
I also noticed this on 4.1 and this fix seems to resolve it.
There is no Jira ticket I could find and since Hugo isn't online right
now I'm requesting it this way.
Or do we want a Jira ticket first?
Wid
On Apr 4, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:44:33AM +0100, Donal Lafferty wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>>
>> The GET / POST limit to HTTP verbs simplifies exposing the agent with HTML
>> forms. Using these verbs the agent interface can be expo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:19:18AM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but
> to me it's a much simpler transition path than coming up with a full REST for
> the agents. I don't think we necessarily need full REST for the agents
> b
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 04 April 2013 2:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism
>
> On Thu, Apr 4,
That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but to
me it's a much simpler transition path than coming up with a full REST for the
agents. I don't think we necessarily need full REST for the agents because
they're not really full services anyways.
The http calls jus
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:31:19PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> In this morning's IRC chat, it was very properly pointed out that
> CloudStack could use more doc writers.
>
> We have a backlog of suggestions for large, new documentation projects. We
> collected these suggestions under the Doc
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:45PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote:
> I raised CLOUDSTACK-1917, it is not a functional bug, but to finalize the
> way for plugin developers to add/remove feature related components &
> related configuration. It seems to make sense to cut its final style in
> 4.1 for its fir
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One of our graduation checklist items is to get the cloudstack.org
> > domain migrated to ASF infra for registration ownership and probably
> > also for name
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10275/
---
(Updated April 4, 2013, 2:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yada
I've reverted that commit from 4.1.
Abhi, please correct the change and commit to master. Please then
provide either a Patch Request email for me to cherry-pick over to the
4.1 branch, or submit a reviewboard entry for me to apply to 4.1.
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Chip Childers w
Thanks Edison, now we can build like a boss™ [1]
[1]
https://github.com/bhaisaab/dotfiles/commit/965c9d5594cb29e0e86f3bcdfc9b0947d88b50c6
Cheers.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a way
> may help you a littl
Abhi,
Can you please review? This is now a blocker.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Milamber wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/04/2013 05:51, aprat...@apache.org a ecrit :
>
>> Updated Branches:
>>refs/heads/4.1 489010123 -> f1c7f4022
>>
>>
>> bug CLOUDSTACK-1842: adding the missing os type in upgrade sc
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:42:45AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, L Radhakrishna Rao
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So are we going to report it into python?
>> >
>> > What's the entire plan?
>> >
>>
>> Rao, there is
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> I noticed that the CloudStack UI allows VM control to accounts that don't
> have an API key set defined.
>
> How does its authentication mechanism work? E.g.
>
>
> 1. How are API calls authenticated and authorized if they
>
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:18:22PM -0700, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a way may
> help you a little bit to build cloudstack as quick as possible:
> mvn -pl `git status --porcelain |sed '/^?/d'| awk '{print $2}' |sed
> 's/\/src/$/'|cut -d $
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
