Bug is already raised for the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel#comment-13613548
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 11:
About CLOUDSTACK-1795 Customize AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack @DB
and @ActionEvent semantics, I've done with code changes now, I will have
more tests at tomorrow before check it in.
Kelven
On 3/25/13 4:26 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote:
>1772 and 1664 will be fixed together. I have to work o
Hi All,
On the latest master , while adding the nfs location as primary storage, am
getting error and not able to add the primary storage.
Error is can't find storage provider: null
This is from the storageManagerImpl as it's not able to find the
DatastoreProvider.
Others also getting the same
Exactly, John ... All of what you said, plus - for example - it really puts
the onus on the plug-in developer to update the plug in whenever we add
support for a new hypervisor (say, HyperV).
I'm happy to help out with this effort to extract hypervisor knowledge away
from these plug-ins, so - if w
Mike,
+1 .. If storage plugins have to understand each hypervisor, the
support matrix becomes unmaintainably complex. We have a variety of
abstractions commonly understood by hypervisors (e.g. LUNs, I/O
streams, sockets, files, etc) that a storage can either be yielded or
manipulated by a storage
This looks good to me, and I will merge the code soon. If anyone has any
objections do let me know.
From: Sanjay Tripathi
mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com>>
Reply-To: Sanjay Tripathi
mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com>>
Date: Thursday 21 March 2013 12:47 PM
To: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
mailto:sate
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#review18380
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On March 21, 2013, 7:17 a.m., San
On 25 March 2013 19:09, David Nalley wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomously. For
On 25 March 2013 20:55, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Geoff Higginbottom to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that he has accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomously.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
> It makes a lot of sense to write the ServerResourse for Hyper-V in C#,
> because there's a lot of frameworks written in the Microsoft ecosystem with
> C# in mind.
>
> If that's the case, then it also makes sense to use the Microsoft compil
I assume, and it seems this way from the spec, that the load balancer VM
just lives in the same network as the VMS you want to balance and redirects
traffic to them. It has a link local nic plus 1 nic.
That's why I was thinking it would be easy to just create a static Nat rule
to the internal load
If the services are provided by a LBVM, it should have access to both networks,
one NIC in the web tier (the guest network where the VIP is present) and one
NIC in the App Tier (the guest network where the server vms are present), would
that understanding be right? So when provisioning the LB VM
Congratualtions, kawai-san!
2013/3/25 David Nalley
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
> autonomo
Congrats Kawai-san!
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
> Congratulations Kawai-san!
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Alena Prokharchyk <
> alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > Kawai-san, congratulations!
> >
> > On 3/25/13 6:39 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
> >
> > >
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > It looks like a build that normally takes 6 minutes has taken 2 hours. I
> > would recommend killing it since it looks hung.
> >
> > See https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudst
1772 and 1664 will be fixed together. I have to work on a customer patch
this morning. The fix for these two may be delayed
Kelven
On 3/25/13 1:15 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The following bugs need to be either (1) resolved or (2) triaged as not
>being as high a priority as they are
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> It looks like a build that normally takes 6 minutes has taken 2 hours. I
> would recommend killing it since it looks hung.
>
> See https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-build-41/246/
>
> Note that I am not a subscriber so reply directly to
Then agree to discuss it on dev list. Doesn't seem very hard to do to me.
There's going to be people like you and me who'll be monitoring and reminding
people that the feature is cross components.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Mond
It looks like a build that normally takes 6 minutes has taken 2 hours. I
would recommend killing it since it looks hung.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-build-41/246/
Note that I am not a subscriber so reply directly to me if you want me to
respond.
It makes a lot of sense to write the ServerResourse for Hyper-V in C#, because
there's a lot of frameworks written in the Microsoft ecosystem with C# in mind.
If that's the case, then it also makes sense to use the Microsoft compiler to
compile the ServerResource.
I'm unclear how this impacts c
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 05:45 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> To me the dev list is already a general list. I rather see more topic
> oriented lists like: dev-network, dev-storage, dev-hypervisor.
What happens if a topic crosses over between storage, networking and
hypervisors (or some subset)? I think
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] create a general@ mailing list?
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > I've noticed that s
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not
> specifically about deve
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013, at 10:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> example, the last email I sent was about project meta-data. It's not
> specifically about deve
Hey Edison,
So...if you think my understanding is correct (please check out the e-mail
below), then I have a question.
Do we really want to have the storage plug-ins taking on the responsibility
of talking to the hypervisors to hook up the storage that they just created?
I'm a bit familiar with
Hi,
Requesting help to resolve the following issue, if you have done upgrade.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1694
Upgrade is failing - if there is anyone that can take a look at it during US
time zone that would be great.
Thanks
/Sudha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10122/#review18361
---
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/Libvi
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:05:49PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Yes, baremetal implies not inside a system vm, so it could run in a VM
> whose lifecycle is not controlled by CloudStack.
Great! That's what thought. You might want to update to be a little
more clear about it though, because I
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> That facility exists already, although the only supported baremetal
> appliance is the Juniper SRX.
And thats expensive. Id prefer a viable open source solution
external on bare metal then on the h
That facility exists already, although the only supported baremetal
appliance is the Juniper SRX.
On 3/25/13 1:59 PM, "Outback Dingo" wrote:
>it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as
>not to use resources required on the hosts
>Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or oth
Yes, baremetal implies not inside a system vm, so it could run in a VM
whose lifecycle is not controlled by CloudStack.
On 3/25/13 1:44 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:54:09PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system
it would be even nicer if the "virtual router" could be bare metal so as
not to use resources required on the hosts
Id much prefer to run Vyatta, or other FreeBSD pf box as the virtual
router, and just have cloudstack comunicate to it
however its probably outside the scope of this document, Im also
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:54:09PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> To enable a cloud to start quicker, I am proposing that system vms be made
> optional in the boot-up of a CloudStack Cloud.
> I'm working on the 'quickcloud' branch and the detailed proposal is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/con
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10124/
---
(Updated March 25, 2013, 8:41 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10124/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Fix for deleting all slashe
Hi all,
The following bugs need to be either (1) resolved or (2) triaged as not
being as high a priority as they are now before I cut the RC. Can folks
take a moment to review and update / fix accordingly please?
CLOUDSTACK-1694 Issues to start/access Management Server after upgrade from 4.0
to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Password+Encryption+
-+Make+SHA1+Salted+as+default+authenticator+and+encoder.
ŠParth
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10122/
---
Review request for cloudstack, akarasulu and edison su.
Description
---
Th
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:39:10AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> FYI. I also cannot use "git am" to apply this patch, it can only be
> applied through "git apply", not sure why. Also, the patch downloaded from
> review board cannot be applied even through "git apply". Vijay gave me h
Hi Chip,
FYI. I also cannot use "git am" to apply this patch, it can only be
applied through "git apply", not sure why. Also, the patch downloaded from
review board cannot be applied even through "git apply". Vijay gave me his
patch last Friday, and I can apply that one using "git apply" a
Congratulations Kawai-san!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Kawai-san, congratulations!
>
> On 3/25/13 6:39 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> >Hiroaki Kawai to become
Awesome news Geoff! Congrats and looking forward to more of your
contributions.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, John Burwell wrote:
> Congrats, Geoff.
>
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Geoff
> >
> > Animesh
> >
woohoo! thanks gang... I appreciate the opportunity to give back to the
open source community.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Congratulations Ahmad!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, Marc
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:49:10AM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> commit 8eb3ebbe1abc6b33b28c58ff3cd4090dd78da58b
> Author: Marcus Sorensen
> Date: Mon Mar 25 09:44:44 2013 -0600
>
> Summary: CLOUDSTACK-1565 - Waits for ip to come up before setting
> default route
>
> Submitted-by: Ja
For clouds offering a full range of network services ("Advanced"), the
virtual router template will still be necessary.
On 3/25/13 2:43 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Nice proposal, I would love to escape the necessity to preseed and
>launch service VMs in order to install/start CloudStack to launch
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:45:04PM +, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> Chip,
>
> I have reopened the one for you in 4.1.
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9900/
>
> This applies well in 4.1. Let me know if you still see any issue.
Applied. Thanks!
>
> Thanks,
> Pradeep S
>
>
> -Origin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9900/#review18352
---
Ship it!
applied to 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 22, 2013, 10:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9900/#review18350
---
Commit 8d3a7f29b8307bff10a66d7871ad9c83f26deb1c in branch refs/heads/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10079/#review18351
---
Commit 8d3a7f29b8307bff10a66d7871ad9c83f26deb1c in branch refs/heads
Congratulations Ahmad!!
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:08 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ahmad Emneina
Subject: RE: New committer: Ahmad Emneina
Yey! Hearty Congratulations, Ahmad!!
> On 3/24/13 4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10104/#review18349
---
Ship it!
applied to master and 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 25,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10060/#review18348
---
Ship it!
applied to master and 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 25,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10104/#review18347
---
Commit 4d853d7d41a13996eeb6772cae173a672fb792ac in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10104/#review18344
---
Commit ae3a04835096f3e2f8dd659a33ac46348e46b670 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10104/
---
(Updated March 25, 2013, 5:16 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
--
Marcus,
Supporting public LB on all tiers is a separate feature, and initially we
were planning to add support for that in 4.2 along with Internal LB. But
as we have limited engineering resources, so we decided to add support for
Internal LB only at this point, as this is the use case most of the
Yey! Hearty Congratulations, Ahmad!!
> On 3/24/13 4:35 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> >Ahmad Emneina to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
> >he has accepted.
> >
> >Being a committer al
Kawai-san, congratulations!
On 3/25/13 6:39 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
>that they have accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
Felicitations, Hiroaki
On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:38 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> Congrats, Hiroaki.
>
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Min Chen wrote:
>
>> Congrats Hiroaki.
>>
>> -min
>>
>> On 3/25/13 6:52 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>>
>>> Congrats Hiroaki!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 P
Congrats, Geoff.
On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Congratulations Geoff
>
> Animesh
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:25 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: New commi
Congrats, Hiroaki.
On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Min Chen wrote:
> Congrats Hiroaki.
>
> -min
>
> On 3/25/13 6:52 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
>> Congrats Hiroaki!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
Congrats, Ahmad.
On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Min Chen wrote:
> Congrats, Ahmad. Well deserved.
>
> -min
>
> On 3/24/13 4:35 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>> has asked Ahmad Emneina to become a committer and we ar
Congratulations Ahmad
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Ahmad Emneina
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
Congratulations Geoff
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:25 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Geoff Higginbottom
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
Congrats Hiroaki!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:35 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> Congrats Hiroaki.
>
> -min
>
> On 3/25/13 6:52 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>
>> Congrats Hiroaki!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apa
Congratualtions Hiroaki
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:39 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Hiroaki Kawai
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Hiroaki Kawa
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:33:38AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:15 AM
> > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang; Kelven Yang; clouds
Congrats Hiroaki.
-min
On 3/25/13 6:52 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>Congrats Hiroaki!
>
>On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
>> that the
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:15 AM
> To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang; Kelven Yang; cloudstack;
> Vijayendra Bhamidipati
> Subject: Re: Review Request: Temporarily disablin
I'm not sure if this belongs in the same conversation, but we'd also
like to remove the "only one loadbanced network per VPC" limitation.
It seems like maybe this could be leveraged to do that, for example
you could bring up a loadbalancer system VM in each VPC network and
then forward a public IP
Congrats, Ahmad. Well deserved.
-min
On 3/24/13 4:35 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Ahmad Emneina to become a committer and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contrib
Congratulations, Ahmad!!
On 3/24/13 4:35 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
>has asked Ahmad Emneina to become a committer and we are pleased to
>announce that he has accepted.
>
>Being a committer allows many contributors to cont
Hi Rajesh,
The template for the InternalLBVM is still TBD. As I'm covering management
server business logic only, I will probably use VR template for the system
vm to test my stuff. It will be for the backend engineer to decide which
template to use as the default for InteranlLB.
-Alena.
On 3/22
Congrats and welcome!
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 12:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: New committer: Geoff Higginbottom
Well deserved. Congrats Geoff...
-Original Message-
From:
Well deserved. Congrats Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 8:55 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New committer: Geoff Higginbottom
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Congrats Geoff!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 25, 2013, at 8:41 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> Please join me in congratulating Geoff!
>
> Congrats, Geoff! Welcome aboard!
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier
> j...@zonker.net
> Twitte
commit 8eb3ebbe1abc6b33b28c58ff3cd4090dd78da58b
Author: Marcus Sorensen
Date: Mon Mar 25 09:44:44 2013 -0600
Summary: CLOUDSTACK-1565 - Waits for ip to come up before setting
default route
Submitted-by: Jayapal Reddy
Signed-off-by: Marcus Sorensen 1364226284 -0600
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Please join me in congratulating Geoff!
Congrats, Geoff! Welcome aboard!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10060/#review18340
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marcus Sorensen
On March 25, 2013, 10:27 a.m
Well deserved Geoff, thanks for helping out all the users.
-sebastien
On Mar 25, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Geoff Higginbottom to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that he has accepted.
>
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Geoff Higginbottom to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
Hi there,
I am vennila. How are you doing?.well, I am trying to deploy a cloud
environment using cloud-stack. So, i wannna know some details. How can I
contact you?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 08:12:52AM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Vijay
>
> Can you check this again with a new workspace? Chip both Min and I had
> verified on Friday that patch was applying before Vijay posted it. I will
> also try again with fresh 4.1. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I did
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:02:56PM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Congrats everyoneŠ
>
> A stupid question and probably little late for this Šbut what does it
> exactly mean to become a TLP - (other than the fact that we are officially
> part of Apache foundation now) ?
Several things, but primarily
Vijay
Can you check this again with a new workspace? Chip both Min and I had
verified on Friday that patch was applying before Vijay posted it. I will also
try again with fresh 4.1. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks
Animesh
On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:08 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> --
Congrats everyoneŠ
A stupid question and probably little late for this Šbut what does it
exactly mean to become a TLP - (other than the fact that we are officially
part of Apache foundation now) ?
And can we please also share our proposal to the the IPMC for graduating
to a TLP - should be an inte
Hi,
I have posted automated test result status. Thanks Rayees and Talluri to run
the tests and compiling the data. Test results are less than spectacular but
process has started and will continue in that path. Also several test cases and
env configurations need to be resolved.
https://cwiki.ap
Chip,
I have reopened the one for you in 4.1.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9900/
This applies well in 4.1. Let me know if you still see any issue.
Thanks,
Pradeep S
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 8:53 PM
To: Prad
On 03/25/2013 03:20 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
Party time...
Indeed! I'll open a beer on this awesome news tonight!
Great work again everybody, let's keep making CloudStack better and better!
Wido
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Monday, Ma
Party time...
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 7:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache CloudStack™ as a
Top-Level Project
Sending to dev@ - it's now officially official: P
On my side I still cannot get pass the SNMP Alert test failure. I ran the
test from the console using
/bin/sh -c cd /root/incubator-cloudstack/plugins/alert-handlers/snmp-alerts
&& /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9.x86_64/jre/bin/java -jar
/root/incubator-cloudstack/plugins/alert-handlers/sn
Sending to dev@ - it's now officially official: Please spread the word!
Thanks!
Mature, Open Source turn-key platform widely used for delivering
scalable, full-featured Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) clouds.
Forest Hill, MD –25 March 2013– The Apache Software Foundation (ASF),
the all-volunte
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 06:35:27PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Ahmad Emneina to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that he has accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to cont
Congrats Hiroaki!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:09 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to contrib
Congrats Kawai-san!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 08:39 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to co
Congratulations!
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:39:11AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer allows many contributors to
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Hiroaki Kawai to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
el
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 09:01:49PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> On 23 March 2013 17:53, prasanna wrote:
> > On 23 March 2013 01:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> >>
> >> OK - Next errors:
> >>
> >> mvn -Pdeveloper,marvin -Dmarvin.config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -pl
> >> :cloud-marvin integration-test
> >> [I
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:37:09AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> I would like to propose a new subfeature for the VPC - Blacklist of
> Routes. It will allow admin to block certain routes so they can't be
> configured as Static Routes for the VPC Private gateway.
>
> The detailed requirements a
Can we call it 'marvin-test/integration-test' or something similar?
automation is a bit generic. We have automated tests as unit tests
running via jUnit as well. Edison has some tests in his storage
adapter that uses TestNG.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:24:00AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Yep - eas
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
