Re: [DISCUSS] Reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo

2025-07-15 Thread Dianjin Wang
Hi all, Regarding the sandbox files in the bootcamp, I plan to move them to the `deploy/sandbox` directory. I also plan to refactor them to use the Cloudberry build image as the builder. This will help us avoid maintaining duplicate base image Docker files across multiple directories. BTW, do we

Re: [DISCUSS] Reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo

2025-06-09 Thread Dianjin Wang
Cool! Then I need to rethink the way how to reorganize the `cloudberry-bootcamp` better after our `cloudberry-devops-release` move to the main repo. Best, Dianjin Wang On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 5:25 PM Ed Espino wrote: > > Hi Leonid, > > Totally agree — let’s move the build scripts into the main r

Re: [DISCUSS] Reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo

2025-06-09 Thread Ed Espino
Hi Leonid, Totally agree — let’s move the build scripts into the main repo. Having everything in one place will simplify development, especially for larger changes like PAX support. It’ll streamline testing, reduce cross-repo friction, and make iteration much faster. We can always revisit a split

Re: [DISCUSS] Reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo

2025-06-09 Thread Leonid Borchuk
I totally agree. It would be great to have a single library where all of our assets are stored. But until we start large-scale reconstruction work, I would like to ask a slightly off-topic question: Why do we even need a cloudberry-release-devops? Why can't all our scripts be stored in the main re

[DISCUSS] Reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo

2025-06-08 Thread Dianjin Wang
Hi all, Over the past two years, the bootcamp repo has grown to include various types of content, such as sandbox Dockerfiles, tutorials, and learning materials. I’d like to start a discussion around reorganizing the `apache/cloudberry-bootcamp` repo to improve clarity and maintainability across o