Re: 0.13.0 issues

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Brackx
Hi, No, i don't. That's it. Thanks. Michael On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi Michael, > > There is an exact flag in the Acl interface and in the ObjectData > interface (... for historical reasons). > For getObject() (and getChildren(), etc.) the exact flag in the Obj

Re: 0.13.0 issues

2015-04-08 Thread Florian Müller
Hi Michael, There is an exact flag in the Acl interface and in the ObjectData interface (... for historical reasons). For getObject() (and getChildren(), etc.) the exact flag in the ObjectData interface counts. Do you set that? - Florian Hi, Yes, it does. With the browser binding the tes

Re: 0.13.0 issues

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Brackx
Hi, With a set exact flag in AclConvertTest the result flag is always null. Michael On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Michael Brackx wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, it does. > With the browser binding the tests pass. > > Is the exact flag available for the atompub and webservices binding? > I don't immed

Re: 0.13.0 issues

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Brackx
Hi, Yes, it does. With the browser binding the tests pass. Is the exact flag available for the atompub and webservices binding? I don't immediately see where it is serialized. It is not used in XMLConverter.writeAcl Michael On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi Michael, >

Re: 0.13.0 issues

2015-04-08 Thread Florian Müller
Hi Michael, Does your server return the ACL isExact flag? This TCK check is new in this release and maybe a bit to harsh. We could change it to a warning. - Florian Hi, After upgrading to 0.13.0, i have issues with the atom and webservice bindings. For example the Root Folder Test is com