Re: ObjectiveCMIS browser binding comments

2014-04-22 Thread Gavin Cornwell
Hi Peter, No problem, moving the UriBuilder classes is one of the re-factoring items I’d suggested (if it still makes sense) so I’ll take a look when I undertake that task (I had hoped to get it done over Easter but clearly that didn’t happen!) Thanks for all your efforts so far. Regards, Gav

Re: ObjectiveCMIS browser binding comments

2014-04-22 Thread Sutter, Peter
Hi Gavin, you can give it a try but then we have to write it in a generic way that we can use it for all methods :) Best regards, Peter On 4/21/14, 10:31 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" wrote: >Hi Peter, > >Yep, the two properties on RepositoryInfo are not used currently and are >actually stored in the

Re: ObjectiveCMIS browser binding comments

2014-04-21 Thread Gavin Cornwell
Hi Peter, Yep, the two properties on RepositoryInfo are not used currently and are actually stored in the binding session (as they are in the atompub binding) so I would definitely suggest removing them. Yes, I see the CMISURLUtil is used consistently in all methods, but we are repeating the s

Re: ObjectiveCMIS browser binding comments

2014-04-18 Thread Sutter, Peter
Hi Gavin, thanks for your feedback. Yes those constants should be move to the CMISBroserConstants header file. Yup there should be rather a browser binding subclass for the RepositoryInfo that holds those two properties. I will do that (or will remove it as those properties are currently not used

ObjectiveCMIS browser binding comments

2014-04-17 Thread Gavin Cornwell
Hi Peter, You’ve made great progress already, I just have a few questions/comments about the changes made in revision 1588209. There are a couple of browser binding constants in CMISConstants.h (kCMISParameterSelector & kCMISParameterSuccinct), can you please move these to CMISBrowserConstants