Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2

2013-04-09 Thread Florian Müller
Hi, There doesn't seem much interest in a beta 2 release. So I'll move on and implement the CMIS 1.1 Web Services support. - Florian Hi all, How about releasing OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2? The main new feature would be CMIS 1.1 support for the AtomPub binding. I think that's big and interesting

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2

2013-04-05 Thread Huebel, Jens
Sounds like a good idea... Jens On 04.04.13 15:32, "Florian Müller" wrote: > Hi all, > > How about releasing OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2? > The main new feature would be CMIS 1.1 support for the AtomPub binding. > I think that's big and interesting enough to justify another beta > release. > > > - F

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2

2013-04-04 Thread Michael Brackx
Yes, that would be nice. Michael On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi all, > > How about releasing OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2? > The main new feature would be CMIS 1.1 support for the AtomPub binding. I > think that's big and interesting enough to justify another beta release.

[DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2

2013-04-04 Thread Florian Müller
Hi all, How about releasing OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta 2? The main new feature would be CMIS 1.1 support for the AtomPub binding. I think that's big and interesting enough to justify another beta release. - Florian

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-16 Thread Gabriele Columbro
A slightly delayed +1. I will proceed with the release of Opencmis 0.9.0-beta-1 this week. Gab On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Potts wrote: > +1 > > On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and >

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-09 Thread Jeff Potts
+1 On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi, > > The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and the > Browser Binding implementation is done. What's missing are the Web Services > and AtomPub Binding additions for CMIS 1.1 as well as TCK coverage for all

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-09 Thread Peter Monks
G'day Florian, I don't think I have official voting rights, but a big +1 from me, FWIW! Cheers, Peter On Jan 9, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi, > > The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and the > Browser Binding implementation is done. What's m

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-09 Thread Huebel, Jens
I like this idea as well. The InMemory test server has most of the 1.1 stuff implemented but is still very unstable. But it's good point in time to kick off something. +1 On 09.01.13 11:21, "Florian Müller" wrote: > Hi, > > The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and

Re: [DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-09 Thread Florent Guillaume
Seems a good idea, +1. Florent On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > Hi, > > The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and the > Browser Binding implementation is done. What's missing are the Web Services > and AtomPub Binding additions for CMIS 1.1 a

[DISCUSSION] OpenCMIS 0.9.0 beta

2013-01-09 Thread Florian Müller
Hi, The OpenCMIS client and server APIs have been updated for CMIS 1.1 and the Browser Binding implementation is done. What's missing are the Web Services and AtomPub Binding additions for CMIS 1.1 as well as TCK coverage for all new CMIS 1.1 features. I'd suggest kicking off an OpenCMIS 0.9