Re: [VOTE] CEP-21 Transactional Cluster Metadata

+1 nb > On Feb 6, 2023, at 9:05 PM, Ariel Weisberg wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023, at 11:15 AM, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to start a vote on this CEP. >> >> Proposal: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-21%3A+Transactional+Cluste

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.10

+1nb > On May 25, 2023, at 10:14 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > +1 > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:13 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.10 for release. >> >> sha1: da77d3f729160e84fbab37666de99550be794265 >> Git: https://gi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.2

+1nb > On May 25, 2023, at 10:12 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.2 for release. > > sha1: c5c075f0080f3f499d2b01ffb155f89723076285 > Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.1.2-tentative > Maven Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content

Re: Changing the output of tooling between majors

OT, but would gladly +1(nb) a `nodetool --output-format=json` CEP. :) [ Some discussion also in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12698 ] > On Jul 8, 2023, at 11:26 AM, Josh McKenzie wrote: > >> I think they should not parse that output in the first place. Gradually >> introduc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 5.0-rc1 (take2)

observe alarmingly high latency stats following upgrade to a build including this bug, though they are not reflective of the actual query execution latency. This should be a quick patch to apply and re-vote on with a fresh build prepared. – Scott > On Jul 5, 2024, at 10:34 AM, Sam Tunnicli

Re: Welcome Sumanth Pasupuleti as Apache Cassandra Committer

Congratulations, Sumanth! > On Nov 5, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Oleksandr Petrov > wrote: > > The PMC members are pleased to announce that Sumanth Pasupuleti has > recently accepted the invitation to become committer. > > Sumanth, thank you for all your contributions to the project over the years. >

Re: Resurrection of CASSANDRA-9633 - SSTable encryption

. I see that the 2016 version adds a couple round-trip unit tests with a small amount of static data. It would be good to see randomized tests fleshed out that exercise more of the read/write path; or which add variants of existing read/write path tests that enable encryption. – Scott > On

Re: [DISCUSSION] Cassandra's code style and source code analysis

that users of modern build tools get for free. It also demands continuous, incremental work to adapt to changes in security and build tooling in use at many companies that don’t need to be made for projects using well-supported tools like Maven or Gradle. – Scott > On Nov 25, 2022, at 4:56

Re: [DISCUSS] Donating easy-cass-stress to the project

mention of compaction-stress. :) – Scott > On Oct 13, 2024, at 8:01 PM, Štefan Miklošovič wrote: > > * easy-cass-stress, sorry. Everything else holds. > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 9:00 PM Štefan Miklošovič <mailto:smikloso...@apache.org>> wrote: >> What does "rep

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Cassandra Cluster Manager (CCM)

+1 > On Mar 9, 2025, at 7:50 AM, Jeremiah Jordan wrote: > > +1 > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 8:03 AM Brandon Williams > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Kind Regards, >> Brandon >> >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 7:18 AM Mick Semb Wever > > wrote: >> > >> > Please v

Re: Hi-Rez of Apache Cassandra logo??

you need. The above URLs are not permanent; since the list allows max-1MB attachments, I've uploaded them to a temporary location. Happy to make changes or to share in another format if that works better. – Scott From: Nate McCall Sent: Thursday, May

Re: Rocksandra performance test result

Thanks for sharing, Jay. Could you say a bit more about how you’ve approached shadowing traffic against an alternate cluster? (Asking not so much with regard to the Rocksandra test, but toward shadowing methodology in general). – Scott > On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:46 PM, Jay Zhuang wr

Re: Testing 4.0 Post-Freeze

Here’s why I really like this proposal: – It focuses our thought and effort on what it’ll take for each of us to become confident in running Apache Cassandra 4.0 for our most critical applications *prior* to cutting the dot-zero release. – It marks a commitment we can make to our user community:

Tracking Testing, Release Status, and Build Health

information? I’d be happy to help maintain information tracking build health, remaining to-do’s, known test automation blockers, flaky tests, etc. as well. Cheers, – Scott

Re: Apache Cassandra Blog is now live

Please feel free to file a ticket (label: Documentation and Website). It looks like Jekyll, the static site generator used to build the website, has a plugin that generates Atom feeds if someone would like to work on adding one: https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-feed

Re: QA signup

Thanks for getting started with performance testing - this is exciting to hear! Periodic SNAPSHOT builds sounds great. I'd feel much better about builds published as date- or SHA-stamped snapshots / nightlies rather than calling them alphas at this point, as everyone's testing work is beginning.

Re: QA signup

committers who have accounts on cwiki.apache.org<http://cwiki.apache.org> [1]. For those who don’t have a cwiki account but would like write access, please sign up and send Jason or myself a message; we can enable write perms: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/signup.action – Scott –––

Re: QA signup

+Performance+Testing On September 18, 2018 at 5:47:18 PM, Mick Semb Wever (m...@apache.org<mailto:m...@apache.org>) wrote: Scott, > @Mick, thanks for your reply re: publishing snapshots/nightlies. In > terms of what’s needed to configure these, would it be automation around > b

Measuring Release Quality

lient. Link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=93324430 Cheers, – Scott –– Measuring Release Quality: [ This document is a draft + sketch of ideas. It is located in the "discussion" section of this wiki to indicate that it is an active draft –

Re: QA signup

Mick – Got it, thanks and sorry to have misunderstood. No fault in your writing at all; that was my misreading. Agreed with you and Kurt; I can’t think of a pressing need or immediate use for the Maven artifacts. As you mentioned, all of the examples I’d listed require binary artifacts only. R

Re: Measuring Release Quality

nyone? Otherwise, I’m equally fine with an experiment to measure basics via the current structure as Josh mentioned, too. – Scott On September 20, 2018 at 8:22:55 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith (bened...@apache.org<mailto:bened...@apache.org>) wrote: I think it would be great to start getting some h

Re: 4.0 Testing Signup

Joey, thanks for starting this document! I’ve updated it to add several leads/contributors, and will probably have a few minor updates to add soon. On November 8, 2018 at 2:49:52 PM, Joseph Lynch (joe.e.ly...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:42 PM kurt

Re: 4.0 Testing Signup

Tommy, thank you! I’ve added your name as a contributor toward upgrade testing. Thanks also for all of the work you’ve done toward this already, filing CASSANDRA-{14820, 14836, 14841, 14842, 14848}. The testing you’ve done so far, patches contributed, and issues reported are all great finds. To

JIRA Reports in Confluence

components to tickets on the "Open Issues by Component - Unscreened” page. Cheers, – Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

to components periodically,” are there other items we need to resolve before we generally feel good about the changes? – Scott On November 26, 2018 at 3:14:05 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith (bened...@apache.org<mailto:bened...@apache.org>) wrote: Hmm. On re-reading your earlier email, I reali

Re: [VOTE] Change Jira Workflow

+1 non-binding > On Dec 17, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Marcus Eriksson wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:19:07PM +, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: >> I propose these changes >> * >> to the Jira Workflow for th

Re: "4.0: TBD" -> "4.0: Est. Q4 2019"?

test plan wiki in Confluence, I owe another pass through. There has been a lot of progress here, but I’ve let perfect be the enemy of the good in getting updates out. I’ll complete that pass later this week. Cheers, — Scott > On May 28, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > +1.

Re: "4.0: TBD" -> "4.0: Est. Q4 2019"?

al stages of the release on gathering feedback from users + developers to validate tooling and automation; compatibility with less commonly-used client libraries, testing new features, evaluating performance and stability under their workloads, etc. – Scott On 6/11/19, 6:45 AM, &qu

Re: Apache Cassandra Virtual meetings

ce alongside the agenda. 7. Decisions: Happen on the dev list, though discussion and consensus-building may occur during calls like this. Hosting / moderating calls like this takes planning and effort, but it seems very doable if others feel it would be valuable to our dev and user community. Ha

Re: Apache Cassandra Virtual meetings

trial calls to see how bad things are? > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019, 08:27 Scott Andreas, wrote: > >> On the "virtual" side -- >> >> I've spent some time this week reviewing how the Kubernetes community >> conducts their weekly meetings. Referen

Re: Stability of MaterializedView in 3.11.x | 4.0

Hi Pankaj, There aren't plans to include substantial changes to the materialized views implementation in C* 4.0, and I'm not aware of project contributors who plan major work on MV's post-4.0 at present. – Scott From: Pankaj Gajjar

Re: time for a release?

+1nb for me for the 3.x releases. The user-facing issues resolved in 2.2 are slimmer and relatively minor (just 15225, 15050, 15045, 15041), but if it makes sense to release all three together, sounds good to me. – Scott On 10/4/19, 11:00 AM, "Jon Haddad" wrote: It's bee

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle

confidence to run it. I want to thank Sumanth for his work on this document and to everyone else who's contributed. I support it (+1 nb). – Scott From: Stefan Podkowinski Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 1:43 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Sub

Re: [VOTE-2] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle

+1 nb From: sankalp kohli Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 11:00 AM To: dev Subject: [VOTE-2] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle Hi, We have discussed in the email thread[1] about Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle. We came up with a doc[2] for it. We h

Re: [VOTE-2] Apache Cassandra Release Lifecycle

planning is a great idea. Would you be willing to rephrase your comments in the form of proposed edits to the document? – Scott From: Stefan Podkowinski Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 1:22 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE-2] Apache Cassand

Re: moving the site from SVN to git

Thanks, Jon! From: Jon Haddad Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 7:07 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: moving the site from SVN to git The migration is finished. I had to fix a few things along the way. The docker containers didn't build corre

Re: Can we kick off a release?

Yes, we should also make sure to include: CASSANDRA-15363: Read repair in mixed mode between 2.1 and 3.0 on COMPACT STORAGE tables causes unreadable sstables after upgrade This is currently r=2 and about ready to land. From: beggles...@apple.com on beha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.19

+1 nb — Scott > On Oct 24, 2019, at 7:09 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, Michael! > > Dinesh > >> On Oct 24, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: >> >> I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.19. >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Cassandra Enhancement Proposal (CEP) documentation

+1 nb > On Nov 1, 2019, at 5:36 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith > wrote: > > +1 > > On 01/11/2019, 12:33, "Mick Semb Wever" wrote: > >Please vote on accepting the Cassandra Enhancement Proposal (CEP) document > as a starting point and guide towards improving collaboration on, and success

Re: [VOTE] Cassandra Enhancement Proposal (CEP) documentation

ading the notes" should be minimal. From: Michael Shuler on behalf of Michael Shuler Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 9:09 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Cassandra Enhancement Proposal (CEP) documentation +1 Scott, was your NGCC talk videoed and

Re: Offering some project management services

-%20Product%20and%20Release%20Management%20in%20Apache%20Cassandra.pdf Cheers, – Scott From: Benedict Elliott Smith Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 6:05 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Offering some project management services To be clear,

Re: Cassandra 4.0 Dev Work Status

I think the intent of the milestones is meant to indicate that contributors view completion of those items as exit criteria for alpha / beta / RC; not necessarily that all items will be completed in strict order. In principle I'd interpret work targeting earlier milestones as higher priority, b

Re: Cassandra 4.0 Dev Work Status

ree that it would be useful to differentiate between which alpha/beta/RC build a given change lands in. Thanks Mick! – Scott From: Mick Semb Wever Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 12:44 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Cassandra 4.0 Dev Work Status

Re: Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

ch up on what's happening here, here's the establishing > > thread: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aa54420a43671c00392978f2b0920bc6926ca9ba1e61a486ad39fb21%40%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E > > > > Key points that Scott Andreas proposed in the initial email was

Re: Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

://docs.google.com/document/d/1Us7y1zgntklNgqcNBAK8bGWDUSb5BhB5MprOSl3500w/edit – Scott > On Jan 21, 2020, at 9:20 PM, Laxmikant Upadhyay > wrote: > > Please share the recording link if the meeting was recorded. Also could not > find the MoM on shared confluence link. > > regards, &g

Re: Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

_____ From: Scott Andreas Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 9:58 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Cc: Jordan West Subject: Re: Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting Hi Laxmikant, Thanks for reaching out. The meeting was recorded; I think the video is being prepared now. Patrick can probably sha

Re: Feedback from the last Apache Cassandra Contributor Meeting

Thank you, Patrick! > On Feb 11, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > Survey is closed. Thank you everyone that took time to give your feedback. > Here are the results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-7YTMZYLT7/ > > Based on the feedback, these meetings are useful and this seem

Re: Idea: Marking required scope for 4.0 GA vs. optional

Yep that makes sense to me. There's still much work to be done to exercise 4.0 builds to identify unknown issues that haven't yet been filed – but those items can be tagged as release blockers as they're identified. 👍 From: Joshua McKenzie Sent: Saturda

Re: Discussion: addition to CEP guide

Sounds good to me as well, thanks for suggesting. From: Jon Haddad Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 9:54 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Discussion: addition to CEP guide Great idea Josh, +1 On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:47 AM Benedict Elliott Sm

Re: List of serious issues fixed in 3.0.x

vements, and flaky test reduction have helped us make huge progress toward quality and continue to pay dividends. I want to thank everyone for their work on safety and stability. It's clear we have more ahead, but it's critical to Apache Cassandra's future and toward shipping a

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-13994

way of saying: – I like the cadence/sequencing Benedict proposes below. – I think improvements in test engineering can reduce/eliminate invalidation and may increase the scope of what can be a candidate for merge on a given branch – And if not, the cost of missing the train is lower because we&#

Re: [DISCUSS] Considering when to push tickets out of 4.0

I'll take attribution for the delay in comment on 15299; this was in part a case of a pressing need to investigate a potential 3.0 data resurrection issue drawing attention from 4.0. I agree with the statement that we shouldn't consider protocol V5 ready for finalization in its current form. If

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc

+1 nb, thanks for everyone's work on this! From: Jordan West Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:09 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc +1 nb On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:45 PM Jake Luciani wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Ju

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

+1 nb > On Jun 20, 2020, at 9:37 AM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > +1 (binding / present / active) > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:23 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >> +1(non-binding) >> >> On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 11:38, Brandon Williams wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 10:12

Re: Community marketing for C*

enthusiasm leading up to the 4.0 release sounds great. Happy to help with writing, speaking, and any way I can. Cheers, — Scott > On Jun 24, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Melissa Logan wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m with an open source-focused marketing firm > (https://constantia.io/) that work

Re: [DISCUSS] When to branch 4.0

, paging state, mixed-version clusters, and reverse iteration. :) — Scott > On Jun 26, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > >  >> >> >> I've seen a lot of talk from some quarters of a new approach to quality, >> but so far there have been fe

Re: [DISCUSS] A point of view on Testing Cassandra

and there's a lot that has me nodding. Toward the opening statement on "empirical evidence to quantify relative stability," I'd love to revisit discussion on quantifying attributes like these here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=93324430 – Scott

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta1

if there are at least three binding +1s and no > -1s. > >> > > > > > > Vote closed/cancelled, am re-cutting it… > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: naming development branches consistently

e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >> > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: 4.0 GA scope: the opt-in approach (CALL TO ACTION)

Thank you, Josh! Just took a pass and opted in 22 of the 55 tickets with the triage keyword as of this evening, most of which are active this month or are for flaky/failing tests. – Scott From: Joshua McKenzie Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 11:01 AM To

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.6

+1nb From: Jordan West Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 7:40 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.6 +1 On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 7:25 AM Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:20 AM Oleksandr Petrov >

Re: Supported upgrade path for 4.0

Great, thanks Ben! The primary configuration my colleagues and I will be vetting is the 3.0.x -> 4.0 path (implicitly, 2.1 -> 3.0 -> 4.0). From a quality + safety perspective we will be ensuring that it’s a smooth ride for folks who opt for this route; though no major concerns on my part with t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.23

+1 nb > On Oct 31, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > +1 > > Signatures and checksums match, source build works, as does dis/enablebinary. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:29 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.0.23 for release. >> >> sha1: 31530

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-beta3

+1 nb > On Oct 31, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > +1 > > Signatures and checksums match, source build works, as does dis/enablebinary. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:30 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: >> >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0-beta3 for release. >> >> sha1: be

Re: Renaming master to trunk on cassandra-builds, cassandra-website, cassandra-dtest

mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: Cassandra 4.0 dropping support for older distributions Centos 5, Debian 4, Ubuntu 7.10

Thanks for flagging this, Mick! No concern from me as all EOL dates for these distributions have long passed and agreed that a NEWS entry is a good way to surface to users. From: Mick Semb Wever Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 12:09 PM To: dev@cassandra.

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.7

+1nb From: Brandon Williams Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 10:05 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.7 +1 On Thu, Dec 3, 2020, 7:02 AM Oleksandr Petrov wrote: > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.7

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisiting the quality testing epic scope

::TestTransientReplicationRing::test_move_forwards_and_cleanup Cheers, – Scott > On Jan 14, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Benjamin Lerer > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > As discussed before the holidays, it might make sense to revisit the scope > of the quality testing tickets for 4.0 GA t

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisiting the quality testing epic scope

;s a good time for that RC gut check. If there's a remaining issue that would prevent you from running trunk in a prod environment, please file it and raise attention - it'll help us finish polishing the release. And if there isn't - deploy it! We still need to finish the remaining b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.24

+1 nb From: Yifan Cai Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 12:51 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.24 +1 nb On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 7:11 AM Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 29 Jan 2021, at 14:31, Ekaterin

Re: Welcome Paulo Motta as Cassandra PMC member

Congratulations, Paulo! From: Jordan West Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 5:39 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Welcome Paulo Motta as Cassandra PMC member Congrats Paulo! Jordan On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:25 PM Berenguer Blasi wrote: >

Re: Project Roadmap

+1 as well. This would be great for the project and for our users. From: Benedict Elliott Smith Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:26 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Roadmap Yep, I'm not proposing we start discussions right now. Just want

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

will set the community up well for some awesome and exciting > stuff that will still be in the pipeline if it doesn't make it to 4.0. That sounds great to me, too. – Scott From: Kenneth Brotman Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 2:20:59 PM To: dev@ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1

+1 nb. This is a huge milestone for the project. From: Paulo Motta Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:57 AM To: Cassandra DEV Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 +1 Em ter., 30 de mar. de 2021 às 00:25, Dinesh Joshi escreveu: > +1 > > Di

Re: [DISCUSSION] Next release roadmap

igher standard. Cheers, �C Scott [1] https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/HdfsRollingUpgrade.html From: guo Maxwell Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:25 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Next re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 (take2)

+1nb, thank you! From: Ekaterina Dimitrova Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 12:23 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 (take2) +1 and thanks everyone for all the hard work Checked: - gpg signatures - sha che

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc1 (take2)

Looks like we’ve crossed the 72-hour mark. Shall we tally? 😀 > On Apr 23, 2021, at 4:43 AM, Paulo Motta wrote: > +1 > >> On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 06:35 Aleksey Yeshchenko >> wrote: >> +1 On 23 Apr 2021, at 08:51, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: >>> +1 On 23 Apr 2021, at 04:19, Jasonstack Zhao

Re: Welcome Stefan Miklosovic as Cassandra committer

Congratulations, Štefan! From: David Capwell Sent: Monday, May 3, 2021 10:53 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Welcome Stefan Miklosovic as Cassandra committer Congrats! > On May 3, 2021, at 9:47 AM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > > Congrat Ste

Re: Welcome Caleb Rackliffe as Cassandra committer

Congratulations, Caleb! — Scott > On May 14, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Andrés de la Peña > wrote: > > Congrats Caleb, well deserved! :) > >> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 17:53, Paulo Motta wrote: >> >> Awesome, congratulations Caleb!! :) >> >> Em sex.,

Re: Welcome Dinesh Joshi as Cassandra PMC member

Congratulations, Dinesh! From: Lorina Poland Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:27 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Welcome Dinesh Joshi as Cassandra PMC member Congratulations, Dinesh! Lorina Poland e. lor...@datastax.com w. www.datastax.com

Re: Are we ready for 4.0.0 (GA) ?

A second RC is appropriate given the revert of CASSANDRA-15899 necessitated by the discovery of CASSANDRA-16735: Adding columns via ALTER TABLE can generate corrupt sstables. Ekaterina and Benedict's statement regarding the true positive rate of flaky tests also shows the value of resolving the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc2

+1 nb From: Andrés de la Peña Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 1:04 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0-rc2 +1 (nb) On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 21:01, Jon Meredith wrote: > +1 (nb) > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:47 AM

[DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-16767, CASSANDRA-16768, and CASSANDRA-16769 for 3.11.x

mpaction path. This merely does the same thing that is already done, just on a subset of SSTables rather than all of them. Thanks for considering this proposal, -Scott Carey P.S. You might wonder why the --oldest-fraction is necessary when one can use --user-defined and some OS level scri

Re: Patch Available status 2021-07-07

As you can see we have a significant amount of Patch Available tickets. Any > help to review those tickets is welcome. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying the CEP process

uld put together a cheat sheet for kinds of discussion and > > what venue to raise them in at different phases in a CEP lifecycle. > > > > Agree. > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (take2)

+1nb. Thank you for sharing a Circle run, Sumanth! From: Sumanth Pasupuleti Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 12:52 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (take2) +1 (nb) Confirmed passing j8 UTs and dtests https:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.0 (third time is the charm)

+1 nb > On Jul 23, 2021, at 2:46 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >  >> >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who >> has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are >> considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding >> +1s an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.25

+1nb, primarily for CASSANDRA-16735. > On Jul 25, 2021, at 10:40 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > I am proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.0.25 for release. > > sha1: 06235e93e16d1f483a3b03ba02f8fb29e33305fa > Git: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.11

+1nb > On Jul 25, 2021, at 12:06 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > I am proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.11 for release. > > sha1: 4cafe2288e56e1135d65e76adbcd6c2de9306d6b > Git: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.11-tentative > Maven Art

Re: [VOTE] CEP-10: Cluster and Code Simulations

+1 nb From: Sam Tunnicliffe Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:54 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] CEP-10: Cluster and Code Simulations +1 > On 26 Jul 2021, at 11:51, bened...@apache.org wrote: > > Proposing the CEP-10 (Cluster and Code S

Re: [DISCUSS] Releases after 4.0

Just my random thoughts as an outsider while trying to look at this thread months after the fact. I could have missed some details along the way and might not quite understand the final proposal. On this topic in general, it seems a bit odd to me to have support / fixes for a release defined pri

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-16767, CASSANDRA-16768, and CASSANDRA-16769 for 3.11.x

being left in limbo with no resolution is worse than being told "no", especially for new contributors. On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:23 PM Brandon Williams wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:49 PM Scott Carey wrote: > > > > I'd like to discuss the inclusion of the abo

Re: Welcome Adam Holmberg as Cassandra committer

Congratulations, Adam! 🎉 From: Joseph Lynch Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 7:44 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Welcome Adam Holmberg as Cassandra committer Congratulations Adam! On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:25 AM Jordan West wrote: > > Congr

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements

linearizability via assurance of the set of instances voting on a transaction. – Scott From: bened...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 2:31 PM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] CEP 14: Paxos Improvements RE: https://cwiki.apache.org

Re: Potential issues during 4.0 upgrade

way out aside from deploying this patch. We should get a new release out quickly. – Scott From: Sam Tunnicliffe Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 11:27 AM To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Potential issues during 4.0 upgrade Hi all, I just opened a JI

Re: [DISCUSS] Java support roadmap

returned by the API, so users upgrading from 8 to 11 who have a dependency on timestamp identity may want to examine it. That JDK change was: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177809 — Scott --- Mobile On Aug 26, 2021, at 7:35 AM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: Hi everyone, I had a few

Re: [VOTE] CEP-14: Paxos Improvements

+1 > On Aug 27, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >  >> >> >> Proposal: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-14%3A+Paxos+Improvements >> Discussion: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1af3da2d875ef93479e3874072ee651f406b96c915759c7968d3266e%40%3Cdev.cas

Re: Cassandra Summit CFP update

things we build with it. One more thing. We need sponsors! If your employer > can, this is a great opportunity to get your brand out in front of people > building the future. I’ll be back. Go submit a talk. You’ll be happy you > did! Patrick* > -- Scott Hirleman scott.hirle...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format

+1nbOn Dec 19, 2022, at 1:27 PM, Josh McKenzie wrote:+1On Mon, Dec 19, 2022, at 11:54 AM, SAURABH VERMA wrote:+1On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:36 PM Benjamin Lerer wrote:+1Le lun. 19 déc. 2022 à 16:31, Andrés de la Peña a écrit :+1On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 15:11, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:+1On 19 Dec

CircleCI Security Incident

internal systems for unauthorized access from December 21. Details: https://circleci.com/blog/january-4-2023-security-alert/ — Scott

  1   2   3   >