Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

2024-07-20 Thread Josh McKenzie
> if someone proposed adding this library right now, we’d all say no because > it’s unmaintained. Interesting. This perspective resonates with me, but it also raises the immediate next thought of "we should make it a point to proactively move off unmaintained dependencies or take them in-tree".

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

2024-07-20 Thread Dinesh Joshi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 8:48 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote: > if it’s unmaintained, let’s remove it before we’re doing it on fire. > +1 Fire drills are never pleasant. CLI parsing isn't a huge area of personal interest to me. However, it presents a non-trivial attack surface as input processing is a rip

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace airlift/airline library with Picocli

2024-07-20 Thread Miles Garnsey
I don’t usually chime in but I’m a +1 on PicoCLI. I think it’s a great project and the autocompletion features are a game changer for people like me who prefer the CLI and use many CLI tools infrequently. The coloured output is… nice, I guess. Whatever the decision, I think at a strategic level