Re: [DISCUSS] Client protocol changes (Was: 20200217 4.0 Status Update)

There were some discussions on Slack whether CASSANDRA-2848 should be in scope for 4.0 or not, given that its an enhancement. I'm +1 on descoping it and leave it for a later 4.x As it involves a change in the protocol, we could use non-breaking changes to add these types of features to protocol_v

Re: [proposal] Introduce AssertJ in test framework

Hi, Once you get to know assertJ, it's impossible to go back to basic > assertions of JUnit Definitely with you on that :) Great to see people are excited about this, thanks for the responses. Given the positive feedback I have created CASSANDRA-15631

Re: [proposal] Introduce AssertJ in test framework

> (4. potentially migrating other existing tests to AssertJ in the long term) Highest value conversions would probably be assertTrue/False() assertions as I believe those offer the least feedback on failure. I would imagine that exception assertions would follow that especially when leaning on @T