Re: Cassandra Meetup in San Francisco Bay Area

Hello, I just wonder whether there will be some memos or video records for the meetup, so that the ones who are unable to attend the meetup can trace the newest development of Cassandra as well. Regards, Zhijie On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Thanks for organizing this,

[VOTE] 7.0

RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 0.7.0 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. P.S. Don

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1 Although not a binding vote, seems to be playing nicely for me. --Jools On 6 January 2011 17:17, Eric Evans wrote: > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for > release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). > > SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/bran

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

I'll ogranise staging in central tonight - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 6 Jan 2011 17:14, "Eric Evans" wrote: > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we?

Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

Hi all, I am an Apache committer (Apache Synapse ESB, WS All) and working for an organization that develops open-source products. We are interesting in using the Cassandra in our products. We need multi-tenancy support as well as a pluggable authentication and authorization architecture in the Ca

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, indika kumara wrote: > *Multi-tenancy* > > I noticed that you are implementing multi-tenancy [1]. Could you please > guess that how long it would take to finish to the remaining work? I would > like to contribute to that. However, I am a newbie to the Cassandra.

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1 On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17, Eric Evans wrote: > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we?  I propose the following for > release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 > 0.7.0 artifacts: http://people.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1, for reals yo. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for > release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). > > SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 > 0.7.0 artifacts: ht

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1 (not binding) On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1, for reals yo. > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > > > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for > > release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). > > > > SVN: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] 6.9

The old thing still starts up. +1. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:51, Eric Evans wrote: > > Feels about time for a new 6.x point release; Lots of interesting > changes have landed since the last release.  I propose the following for > release as 0.6.9. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cass

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

non binding +1 On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > +1 (not binding) > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > > > +1, for reals yo. > > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans > wrote: > > > > > > > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1 for reals On Jan 6, 2011 11:14 AM, "Eric Evans" wrote: > > RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for > release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0@r1055934 > 0.7.0 artifacts: http://people.apac

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

Thank very much Brandon for your reply. I would like to investigate more on this. I will ask for your suggestions as needed. Thanks, Indika On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:39 AM, indika kumara wrote: > > > *Multi-tenancy* > > > > I noticed

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

Hi Brandon, I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement? Thanks, Indika > Two vague ideas: (1) qualified keyspaces (by the tenet domain) (2) multiple Cassandra storage configurations in a si

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:33 PM, indika kumara wrote: > Hi Brandon, > > I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy > with the existing implementation. Would those be possible to implement? > > Thanks, > > Indika > > > Two vague ideas: (1) qualified keyspaces (by

Re: [VOTE] 6.9

+1 On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Feels about time for a new 6.x point release; Lots of interesting > changes have landed since the last release. I propose the following for > release as 0.6.9. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@

Re: [VOTE] 6.9

+1 On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Feels about time for a new 6.x point release; Lots of interesting > changes have landed since the last release.  I propose the following for > release as 0.6.9. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

+1 non-binding -ryan On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > +1 for reals > On Jan 6, 2011 11:14 AM, "Eric Evans" wrote: >> >> RC 4 seems to be holding up OK, shall we? I propose the following for >> release as 0.7.0 (aka "For Reals Yo"). >> >> SVN: >> > https://svn.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] 7.0

my 13 month old son has scuppered that plan. tomorrow so - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 6 Jan 2011 17:25, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > I'll ogranise staging

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra #663

See

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #148

See Changes: [jbellis] merge from 0.6 [jbellis] reduce flush lock contention patch by Kelvin Kakugawa; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-1930 -- [...truncated 1574 lines...] [junit]

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

Thank you very much Brandon! On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:33 PM, indika kumara >wrote: > > > Hi Brandon, > > > > I would like you feedback on my two ideas for implementing mufti tenancy > > with the existing implementation. Would those be

Re: Multi-tenancy, and authentication and authorization

> (1) has the problem of multiple memtables (a large amount just isn't viable There are some very straightforward solutions to this particular problem: I wouldn't rule out running with a very large number of keyspace/columnfamilies given some minor changes. As Brandon said, some of the folks that