Good questions. Right now we're not actively using it (at least not
publicly, as far as I know, individual contributors may be using it or
sonar or something else).
For the specific warning (index out of bounds) you point out below, if
map.length was odd, then the consumer.consume(map[i],map[i+1])
Hi,
As an undergrad student I actually question the output of static analysis
tools. Are you guys actively using it or do you find projects like Sonar
efficient in such open source projects? Last time I heard that FindBugs are no
longer maintained because the code was hard to maintain. For inst
Ah, I remember that now. Blocked by a guava bug? 4.0 seems like a good time to
upgrade guava.
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 2:49 AM, Stefan Podkowinski wrote:
>
>
>> 2) Static Analysis stuff:
>
> I think it's worth mentioning that I also tried to integrate the Error
> Prone analyzer (
> 2) Static Analysis stuff:
I think it's worth mentioning that I also tried to integrate the Error
Prone analyzer (http://errorprone.info/) a while ago as part of
CASSANDRA-13175. Eventually I dropped the ball there due to some
classpath issues, but maybe that can be fix or worked around.
Having
Glad to hear you are finding lgtm.com useful. I work for Semmle, the
company behind lgtm.com.
I see you are interested in checking regularly for new and fixed alerts on
lgtm.com. This can be achieved through our Github integration described in
https://lgtm.com/docs/lgtm/using-lgtm-analysis-contin
On the hashCode violations they are all on
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/dht/Range.java
which
does seem to get the correct hashcode impl from
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/dht/AbstractBounds.java
Jeff
On
Looks like that solves that problem. Probably wouldn't be a bad idea to
include that list in the release posts as well as link to changes.txt? At
the very least it will make us a bit more careful about assigning fix
versions (maybe).
On 1 November 2017 at 00:36, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 10/31/
On 10/31/2017 07:17 PM, kurt greaves wrote:
> It's usually pretty clear what is a fix in the changes log but they
> definitely require checking. However I'd say putting more boilerplate in
> the changes log isn't really necessary and would be hard to enforce. If we
> could generate a report with th
It's usually pretty clear what is a fix in the changes log but they
definitely require checking. However I'd say putting more boilerplate in
the changes log isn't really necessary and would be hard to enforce. If we
could generate a report with this information from JIRA with desired
information wo
Trying really hard to do this as close to weekly as possible, but it's been
pretty quiet and I've been pretty busy.
A few things to note:
1) Sylvain opened a JIRA (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13910) about deprecating
(dclocal_)read_repair_chance (the probabilistic async read
10 matches
Mail list logo