; Its really very useful
>>
>> Same can be be done in a normal situation to compare the difference.
>>
>> That should give more insights.
>>
>> Cheers, Corry
>>
>>
>> Op vrijdag 29 januari 2016 heeft Peddi, Praveen het
>> volgende geschreve
gnificantly. However, 2.1.11
> read latencies are still 1.5 slower than 2.0.9. One thing we noticed in JMX
> metric that could affect read latencies is that 2.1.11 is running
> ReadRepairedBackground and ReadRepairedBlocking too frequently compared to
> 2.0.9 even though our read_repair_chan
5MinAvg 0.002 0.55
15MinAvg 0.007 0.91
Thanks
Praveen
From: Jeff Jirsa
Reply-To:
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 2:58 PM
To: "u...@cassandra.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Slow performance after upgrading from 2.0.9 to 2.1.11
Sorry I wasn’t as explicit as I should have been
The sam
;>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> We have another update on performance on 2.1.11.
>>>>>> compression_chunk_size didn’t really help much but We changed
>>>>>> concurrent_compactors from
