Re: SSTable generation numbers

2016-06-28 Thread Rajath Subramanyam
Thanks Tyler. - Rajath Rajath Subramanyam On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tyler Hobbs wrote: > 32 bit integer overflow is the only scenario where a single node would wrap > around. > > However, when copying sstables from one node to another, there can easily > be co

Re: SSTable generation numbers

2016-06-28 Thread Tyler Hobbs
32 bit integer overflow is the only scenario where a single node would wrap around. However, when copying sstables from one node to another, there can easily be conflicts, so this is something to be careful about. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Rajath Subramanyam wrote: > Hello Cassandra-dev,

SSTable generation numbers

2016-06-27 Thread Rajath Subramanyam
Hello Cassandra-dev, Are there any scenarios in which the generation numbers of SSTables (i.e. ksname-cfname--Data.db) can wrap around, without the admin dropping and re-creating the CF with the same name ? I believe that the answer must be version-agnostic, but in case it matters, I am specifica