Re: Reads requiring response from both servers.

2014-11-18 Thread Tyler Hobbs
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Jacob Rhoden wrote: > > > If there are two nodes and RF=2, a simple data lookup on a very small > table will only need to talk to one node if you put in a (fake/pointless) > partition key, but two nodes if you don't. The impact is that if you want > 1ms query time

Re: Reads requiring response from both servers.

2014-11-18 Thread Jacob Rhoden
> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:44 am, Tyler Hobbs wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Rhoden wrote: >> >> I was going to report a bug, but first figured I should check its not >> “working as expected”. Is it just me or is it wrong that the following >> query needs to talk to both nodes

Re: Reads requiring response from both servers.

2014-11-18 Thread Tyler Hobbs
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Jacob Rhoden wrote: > I was going to report a bug, but first figured I should check its not > “working as expected”. Is it just me or is it wrong that the following > query needs to talk to both nodes to build a response to this query? > It seems to be working as