org
Subject: Re: Paxos repairs in CEP-14
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 18.40 bened...@apache.org, wrote:
> > And at the end of the repair, this lower bound is known and stored
> somewhere?
>
> Yes, there is a new system.paxos_repair_history table
>
> > Under good conditions, I assume
e nothing to do with the repair, then?)
Henrik
>
>
>
>
> From: Henrik Ingo
> Date: Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 11:45
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Paxos repairs in CEP-14
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 1.45 bened...@apache.org, wrote:
>
> > > As
y node.
CEP-15 will change this, so that nodes will be fully consistent up to some
logical timestamp, but CEP-14 does not change the underlying semantics of LWTs
and Paxos in Cassandra.
From: Henrik Ingo
Date: Sunday, 5 December 2021 at 11:45
To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Paxos repairs
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021, 1.45 bened...@apache.org, wrote:
> > As the repair is only guaranteed for a majority of replicas, I assume I
> can discover somewhere which replicas are up to date like this?
>
> I’m not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean which nodes have
> participated in a paxos repair? T
> As the repair is only guaranteed for a majority of replicas, I assume I
can discover somewhere which replicas are up to date like this?
I’m not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean which nodes have participated in
a paxos repair? This information isn’t maintained, but anyway would not imply
t
