Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-02 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
collectAllData semantics. > >>>>> > >>>>> All told, it certainly isn't a terrible idea, and shouldn't be > >>> dismissed > >>>> so > >>>>> readily. Personally I think in the long run whether or not we manage > >>>

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread graham sanderson
atic >>>>> columns together with non-static columns is dependent on if we intend >>> to >>>>> add tiered "static" columns (i.e., if each level of clustering >>> component >>>>> can have columns associated with it). If we do, we

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
olumns associated with it). If we do, we should definitely > > keep > > > > it all inline. If not, it probably permits a lot better behaviour to > > > > separate them, since it's easier to reason about and improve their > > > distinct > > >

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread Jonathan Ellis
t; > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:24 AM, graham sanderson > > wrote: > > > > > >> Well you lose the atomicity and isolation, but in this case that is > > >> probably fine > > >> > > >> That said, in every interaction I’ve

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread Jonathan Haddad
d for thought. > >> > >>> On Apr 30, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Jonathan Haddad > wrote: > >>> > >>> If you want it in a separate sstable, just use a separate table. > There's > >>> nothing that warrants making the codebase more complex to accom

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread graham sanderson
to accomplish >>> something it already does. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:07 PM graham sanderson >> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone here have an opinion; how realistic would it be to have a >> separate >>>> memtable/sstable for static

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-05-01 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
derson > wrote: > > > >> Anyone here have an opinion; how realistic would it be to have a > separate > >> memtable/sstable for static columns? > >> > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >> *From: *Jonathan Haddad > >> *Subject: **R

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-04-30 Thread graham sanderson
PM graham sanderson wrote: > >> Anyone here have an opinion; how realistic would it be to have a separate >> memtable/sstable for static columns? >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Jonathan Haddad >> *Subject: **Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and

Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns

2015-04-30 Thread Jonathan Haddad
o have a separate > memtable/sstable for static columns? > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Jonathan Haddad > *Subject: **Re: DateTieredCompactionStrategy and static columns* > *Date: *April 30, 2015 at 3:55:46 PM CDT > *To: *u...@cassandra.apache.org > *Reply-To: