Re: Check in on CASSANDRA-15393

2020-09-02 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Very much appreciated that this was raised here Blake, and the detailed write-up you provided. If 4.0-beta gets more such large improvement patches than it does testing and bug-fix patches, then the concern is we will never get to 4.0-rc. So I hope it is only obvious and valued that we do and cont

Re: Check in on CASSANDRA-15393

2020-08-27 Thread Joshua McKenzie
No qualms with that here; it'll be a bit before GA so this has time to soak. On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:21 PM Blake Eggleston wrote: > Caleb is currently working through his second round of review, and Marcus > said he's about halfway through his review as of this morning. So I'd > expect it to b

Re: Check in on CASSANDRA-15393

2020-08-27 Thread Blake Eggleston
Caleb is currently working through his second round of review, and Marcus said he's about halfway through his review as of this morning. So I'd expect it to be committed within a week or so. > On Aug 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Is there an ETA on them landing? The later, t

Re: Check in on CASSANDRA-15393

2020-08-27 Thread Joshua McKenzie
Is there an ETA on them landing? The later, the more risk to stability of GA due to lack of time soaking. On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:01 PM Blake Eggleston wrote: > Hi dev@, > > Mick asked that I check in w/ the dev list about CASSANDRA-15393. There's > some concern regarding the patch and it's su