Hi.
I also believe that wiki are not so good for a community managed wiki even
thought it is used as "de facto" tool for opensource projects doc.
I suggest that we use drupal's book module, it is really full featured and easy
to use.
I would be happy to do some wireframing and set-up a demo if
I agree that wikis are great for contribution; what I meant was that they're
rather poor at organising information for ease of discovery, especially by
new users.
I still like the idea of some more structured docs being managed by the
community though.
On 1 April 2011 02:16, Eric Evans wrote:
>
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 18:57 +0100, Nick Telford wrote:
> I don't think the Wiki is the right place for community maintained
> user docs; it doesn't have the necessary structure.
The wiki is great at what wikis are great at, lowering the barrier to
contribution. There is a lot of good stuff (some
I couldn't agree more, the DataStax docs (try saying that 3 times fast) are
definitely the most complete and user-friendly source for end-users, while
the wiki contains a lot more detailed information on the architecture and
internals.
Ideally, I'd like to see the user docs be in a place that the
