Re: CASSANDRA-19779 in 5.0-rc

2024-07-30 Thread Štefan Miklošovič
I am done, the ticket needs another committer though. On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:00 PM Josh McKenzie wrote: > +1 to should block as well. > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024, at 12:15 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > > This is a weird regression but I'm borderline on this being a blocker. On > a brand new node

Re: CASSANDRA-19779 in 5.0-rc

2024-07-26 Thread Josh McKenzie
+1 to should block as well. On Fri, Jul 26, 2024, at 12:15 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote: > This is a weird regression but I'm borderline on this being a blocker. On a > brand new node starting, this comes up but goes away on the first reboot of > the node. What I don't get is why directIO is disabl

Re: CASSANDRA-19779 in 5.0-rc

2024-07-26 Thread Patrick McFadin
This is a weird regression but I'm borderline on this being a blocker. On a brand new node starting, this comes up but goes away on the first reboot of the node. What I don't get is why directIO is disabled if there is no commit log. What's specific about that? Patrick On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:4

Re: CASSANDRA-19779 in 5.0-rc

2024-07-26 Thread Jeff Jirsa
+1 Should block > On Jul 26, 2024, at 8:25 AM, Štefan Miklošovič wrote: > >  > I am formally asking for acknowledging (1) to be a blocker for 5.0-rc. I > think it was introduced in (2) and it behaves like this (3). > > Regards > > (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19779 >