I'd put https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6060 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4175 on the high
priority list too. "Do less work" can be even more effective than "do
the same work faster."
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith
wrote:
> It's onl
Yes, I have an idea forming up in my mind for 5220, so I'm still on it.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith
wrote:
>>
>> - CASSANDRA-5220: Repair improvements when using vnodes
>
>
> That definitely deserves a "performance" tag. Yuki, are you looking at this
> or should we u
>
> - CASSANDRA-5220: Repair improvements when using vnodes
That definitely deserves a "performance" tag. Yuki, are you looking at this
or should we unassign in case somebody else wants to jump in?
On 15 April 2014 14:59, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 08:28 AM, Benedict Elliott Smit
I thought I'd spammed the change list enough for one day, but since you
mention it... :-)
On 15 April 2014 23:40, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> And here's the Grand List of all performance tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20performance%20
And here's the Grand List of all performance tickets:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20performance%20and%20project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20status!%3Dresolved
Benedict, you might want to un-assign from yourself anything you're
not working on in the near futu
On 04/15/2014 08:28 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote:
It's only been six months since the last performance drive, and 2.1 is now
around the corner. But I'm hoping we can push performance even further for
3.0. With that in mind, I've picked out what I think are the nearest term
wins to focus on.
It's only been six months since the last performance drive, and 2.1 is now
around the corner. But I'm hoping we can push performance even further for
3.0. With that in mind, I've picked out what I think are the nearest term
wins to focus on.
- CASSANDRA-7039: DirectByteBuffer compatible LZ4 met
I've tagged the issues in this thread with the Performance label for
easier tracking:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012310865%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20performance%20and%20status%3Dopen
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I'd like to spend some effor
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3578 (Mulithreaded commitlog)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I'd like to spend some effort in 2.1 improving our performance story
> for non-io-bound workloads. Here are some of the ideas we have
> floating around:
>
> htt
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1632 (Thread workflow
and cpu affinity)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I'd like to spend some effort in 2.1 improving our performance story
> for non-io-bound workloads. Here are some of the ideas we have
> floating aroun
Ha. I've actually been hacking that today. I'm glad to it on
On Sep 20, 2013 1:15 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1632 (Thread workflow
> and cpu affinity)
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis
> wrote:
> > I'd like to spend some effor
(should be): I'm happy to work on it
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Ha. I've actually been hacking that today. I'm glad to it on
> On Sep 20, 2013 1:15 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1632 (Thread workflow
> > and cpu aff
Hi Jonathan,
I can try 5549, if you want.
Regards,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> Well 5417 and 5020 combined
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
>
> > I've been working on 5417
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Ellis
> wro
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5549 (remove Table.switchlock)
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
@spyced
I've been working on 5417
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> It's all yours.
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
> > Seeing Sylvain's comment to hold off on 4175, do you mind if I take a
> whack
> > at 6060?
> > On Sep 19, 2013 9:35 AM, "Jonathan El
Well 5417 and 5020 combined
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> I've been working on 5417
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>> It's all yours.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jason Brown
>> wrote:
>> > Seeing Sylvain's comment to hold of
It's all yours.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Seeing Sylvain's comment to hold off on 4175, do you mind if I take a whack
> at 6060?
> On Sep 19, 2013 9:35 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
>
>> Oh, I misunderstood him. 4175 is yours then!
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:19
Seeing Sylvain's comment to hold off on 4175, do you mind if I take a whack
at 6060?
On Sep 19, 2013 9:35 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Oh, I misunderstood him. 4175 is yours then!
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
> > As Aleksey just claimed 5019 :), either of the othe
Those are maybe the 3 biggest ones here, how about 5019 to start with? :)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> I can take on 4175 and maybe 5019 or 6060. Please assign at will :)
--
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
@spyced
I can take on 4175 and maybe 5019 or 6060. Please assign at will :)
On Sep 19, 2013 9:02 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Fantastic!
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Pavel Yaskevich
> wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > I can take on first two (4817, 5863).
> >
> > Best Regards, Pavel.
> >
> >>
Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4338
(retaining both this and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5019)
--
AY
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 19:07 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5549 (remove Table.switchlock)
Oh, I misunderstood him. 4175 is yours then!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> As Aleksey just claimed 5019 :), either of the other tickets is fine.
> On Sep 19, 2013 9:17 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
>
>> Those are maybe the 3 biggest ones here, how about 5019 to start with
Fantastic!
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I can take on first two (4817, 5863).
>
> Best Regards, Pavel.
>
>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5357 (query cache)
>>
>>> On Thu,
As Aleksey just claimed 5019 :), either of the other tickets is fine.
On Sep 19, 2013 9:17 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Those are maybe the 3 biggest ones here, how about 5019 to start with? :)
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
> > I can take on 4175 and maybe 5019 or 6
Hi Jonathan,
I can take on first two (4817, 5863).
Best Regards, Pavel.
> On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5357 (query cache)
>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> I'd like to spend some effort
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5357 (query cache)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I'd like to spend some effort in 2.1 improving our performance story
> for non-io-bound workloads. Here are some of the ideas we have
> floating around:
>
> https://issues
I'd like to spend some effort in 2.1 improving our performance story
for non-io-bound workloads. Here are some of the ideas we have
floating around:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718 (context switch overhead)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5863 (decompressed c
27 matches
Mail list logo
