We are just getting started with 3.0.10. Will let you know.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Nate McCall wrote:
> There was CASSANDRA-12269 fixed in 3.10 recently as well.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Dikang Gu wrote:
> > We still see perf regression with the otc_coalescing_strategy d
There was CASSANDRA-12269 fixed in 3.10 recently as well.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Dikang Gu wrote:
> We still see perf regression with the otc_coalescing_strategy disabled, and
> on 3.0.10 branches as well. We can share our stress test results here.
>
> @Sankalp, are you guys seeing any
We still see perf regression with the otc_coalescing_strategy disabled, and
on 3.0.10 branches as well. We can share our stress test results here.
@Sankalp, are you guys seeing any throughput regressions on 3.0.10 branch?
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jeremiah D Jordan <
jeremiah.jor.
You may be getting perf issues from message coalescing depending on what CL you
are testing with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12676
Try you tests with:
otc_coalescing_strategy: DISABLED
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Andrew Whang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing perf regressi
Hi,
I'm seeing perf regressions (using cassandra-stress) between 2.2.5 and
3.11. I understand these versions are quite far apart, but just wondering
if there are stress results publicly available that compare 2.x to 3.x?
Thanks.
