Hi Jonathan,
This clarifying change has been incorporated.
If you both rescind your veto, we have time to rescue this vote.
From: Jonathan Ellis
Date: Friday, 15 October 2021 at 19:11
To: dev
Subject: Moving CEP-15 forward
Hi all,
We have had several discussions today as to how to move
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 7:18 AM Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> ...
> *This work shall be developed in a modular manner, to allow for coexistence
> with other consensus protocols or transaction managers. This will allow us
> to evolve Accord without precluding alternative solutions, as future work
> expa
Amending the CEP with the proposed addendum seems to me like a reasonable
compromise to de-escalate this matter and move forward, addressing
potential concerns without any prejudice to the original goals of the CEP.
Em sex., 15 de out. de 2021 às 15:11, Jonathan Ellis
escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> We
Hi all,
We have had several discussions today as to how to move forward on CEP-15,
given that the first vote was vetoed by myself and Mick. From my side the
concern has been that the distributed transactions design space inherently
requires tradeoffs; Accord represents one set of those tradeoffs b
