Unlike in 2019, GSoD does not provide a budgetary service, and the applicant
organization would need to submit a budget including an account detail, which
Apache Cassandra does not have, I assume, and the following message from GSoD
provides the info about getting an account; the message is re
I also looked at it and I do not have any objections.
I also think lazy consensus can be assumed:
https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 3:44, Berenguer Blasi
wrote:
> I did check it when it was originally posted, I had no major concerns :-)
> On 2/2/23
I did check it when it was originally posted, I had no major concerns :-)
On 2/2/23 7:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
No objections from me! And yes, 7 days have passed and no one has
spoken up, you're a committer – you can assume silence is consent.
Folks, Lorina's proposal here is very thorough
No objections from me! And yes, 7 days have passed and no one has spoken
up, you're a committer – you can assume silence is consent.
Folks, Lorina's proposal here is very thorough, and it will re-organise the
docs significantly. Make sure to check it out quickly if you think you
might have any con
I've not had any comment on this topic. Can I assume that no one has objections?
Lorina
On 2023/01/25 19:02:41 Lorina Poland wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm gearing up to help get the Cassandra 5.0 docs in good order before the
> GA release occurs later this year. Recently, I've been thinking about
Greetings!
I'm gearing up to help get the Cassandra 5.0 docs in good order before the
GA release occurs later this year. Recently, I've been thinking about a
more standardized organization to docs, to make it simpler for users to
find what they are looking for, separate from searching. [That's the