On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 17:18 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
> SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org
+1
-Chris
On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
>> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to r
+1
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
> SVN Tag: https://s
+1
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 17:18, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
> SVN Tag: https://s
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:53, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> GCInspector isn't required at runtime
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1061) -- any
> suggestions how to make it happier at build time too?
A healthy dose of reflection! I've attached a patch (based on trunk)
to #1061 that
nvironemnt had an IBM JDK which gives a compile error in
> src\java\org\apache\cassandra\service\GCInspector.java which is using
> some classes from the package com.sun.management
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> As discusse
Evans wrote:
>
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
> SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.6.4
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
+1
-Brandon
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
> carefully and raise any issues you find here.
>
> SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.
As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
carefully and raise any issues you find here.
SVN Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.6.4
0.6.4 artifacts:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> Barring objections, I'd like to tag next Tuesday July 27, and move
> anything not completed by then to 0.6.5. As usual, if you have
> something you think should make it in, but need more time, then let's
> discuss.
+1
-Brandon
+1
Matthieu
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 17:59, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> > It's been the better part of a month since 0.6.3, so it's probably a
> > good time to start thinking about an 0.6.4.
> &
+1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 17:59, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been the better part of a month since 0.6.3, so it's probably a
> good time to start thinking about an 0.6.4.
>
> Barring objections, I'd like to tag next Tuesday July 27, and move
> anything not comp
+1, except that I think that unless we find critical problems we
should plan on 0.6.4 being the last in the 0.6 series.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been the better part of a month since 0.6.3, so it's probably a
> good time to start thin
It's been the better part of a month since 0.6.3, so it's probably a
good time to start thinking about an 0.6.4.
Barring objections, I'd like to tag next Tuesday July 27, and move
anything not completed by then to 0.6.5. As usual, if you have
something you think should make it in
15 matches
Mail list logo
