+1 nb. I too see these tools (bulk analytics and scc) as complementary as has
been said. SCC also does some nice things to support Spark Streaming that I
don't think are addressed by the bulk analytics subproject today.
Regarding dsbulk, I think that's another thread but it's something we're
Likewise - another vote in favor of bringing in this subproject.
Any thoughts on bringing in dsbulk as well? dsbulk has a lower barrier to entry
than Spark Cassandra Connector, addresses a real need for users, and appears to
be at a similar place in its project lifecycle.
Abe
> On Jun 24, 2024
Yeah, having the connector will enhance the Cassandra ecosystem. I'm looking
forward to this contribution.
On 2024/06/24 17:28:48 "C. Scott Andreas" wrote:
> Supportive of accepting a donation of the Spark Cassandra Connector under the
> project's umbrella as well - I think that would be very we
Supportive of accepting a donation of the Spark Cassandra Connector under the project's umbrella
as well - I think that would be very welcome and appreciated. Spark Cassandra Connector and the
Analytics library are also suited to slightly different usage patterns. SCC can be a good fit for
Spar
I also think it would be a great contribution, especially since the bulk
analytics library can’t be used by the majority of teams, since it’s hard
coded to only work with single token clusters.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:51 AM Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> This would be a great contribution to have for
This would be a great contribution to have for the Analytics subproject.
The current bulk functionality in the Analytics subproject complements the
spark-cassandra-connector so I see it as a good fit for donation.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:32 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> What are folks thought
