+1
Regards,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not pe
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but
+1
On Jul 9, 2013 3:21 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but the
> c
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but t
[ Sylvain Lebresne ]
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but the
> current goal is first and foremost
+1
On Jul 9, 2013 4:21 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but the
> c
+1. Woo-hoo!
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> > the
> > following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear tha
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> the
> following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
> only
> a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but t
Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
the
following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear that it is
only
a beta (and the first one at that), so we know it's not perfect, but the
current goal is first and foremost to get better testing.
sha1: fcd
10 matches
Mail list logo