[VOTE RESULTS] was: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-20 Thread Eric Evans
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:17 -0500, Eric Evans wrote: > It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have > made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release > candidate. I propose one more beta in order to get some of this new work > tested while we're closi

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-18 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have > made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release > candidate. I propose one more beta in order to get some of this new work > tested w

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-18 Thread Matthieu Riou
+1 Matthieu On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: > +1 [binding] > On 3/18/10 7:13 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> +1 [binding] >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Eric Evans wrote: >> >> >>> It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have >>> made the

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-17 Thread Ian Holsman
+1 [binding] On 3/18/10 7:13 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: +1 [binding] On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Eric Evans wrote: It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release candidate. I propose one more

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-17 Thread Chris Goffinet
+1 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:17, Eric Evans wrote: > > > > It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have > > made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release > > candidate. I propose on

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-17 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:17, Eric Evans wrote: > > It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have > made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release > candidate. I propose one more beta in order to get some of this new work > tested while we're cl

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-17 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 [binding] On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have > made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release > candidate. I propose one more beta in order to get some of this new work > tested wh

[VOTE] Release 0.6.0-beta3

2010-03-17 Thread Eric Evans
It's been a bit since the last beta, and while many important fixes have made their way in[1], we're still not quite ready to roll a release candidate. I propose one more beta in order to get some of this new work tested while we're closing out the remaining issues[2]. Tag and artifacts for 0.6.0