On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:19 AM sankalp kohli wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Community has been discussing about Apache Cassandra Management process
> since April and we had lot of discussion about which approach to take to
> get started. Several contributors have been interested in doing this and we
> nee
A. +1.
Bias for action. Use something that works. Iterate.
Rahul Singh
Chief Executive Officer
m 202.905.2818
Anant Corporation
1010 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 250
Washington, D.C. 20007
We build and manage digital business technology platforms.
On Sep 12, 2018, 8:23 PM -0400, Jeff Beck , wrote:
>
a. +1 to use some existing project.
But I see no reason not to keep discussion going.
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 7:37 AM Sankalp Kohli wrote:
> The link to the document is available in the other thread. Comparisons are
> available in other thread as well.
>
> > On Sep 12, 2018, at 16:29, Mick
The link to the document is available in the other thread. Comparisons are
available in other thread as well.
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 16:29, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>> I am hoping all the folks who are saying we should not vote will drive the
>> other thread. Also note that there is consens
> I am hoping all the folks who are saying we should not vote will drive the
> other thread. Also note that there is consensus about doing a side car but
> no consensus on which approach to take. I hope not deciding which approach
> is not a poison pill for side car!!
Call me pedantic, but I s
I am hoping all the folks who are saying we should not vote will drive the
other thread. Also note that there is consensus about doing a side car but
no consensus on which approach to take. I hope not deciding which approach
is not a poison pill for side car!!
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:11 PM Mi
> But I'd like to see a serious investigation of the options -- feature set,
> maturity, maintainer availability, etc -- before making a decision. This
> will take some time, but this is a place where "measure twice, cut once"
> seems like the right approach.
This^ 100%.
I dislike the idea o
Hi Joey,
The intention of this vote is to do what you are saying. We
want to see movement on this and not drag it for months. I am happy to drag
it for few more weeks if thats is what we agree on.
Regarding evaluating different options, if we decide on option a, we can
always do that
> I'd like to ask those of you that are +1'ing, are you willing to contribute
> or are you just voting we start an admin tool from scratch because you
> think it'll somehow produce a perfect codebase?
Roopa, Vinay, Sumanth and I are voting as community members (and a
sizeable user) and our willing
Thanks. :) sleep deprivation is real.
To Ellis' point: "But I'd like to see a serious investigation of the
options "
While we've talked about a lot of things on that email thread, I don't
think we have a distilled view of the gap between current status for these
options and the resources available
Congrats on the newborn. I am assuming others also have personal things
going on!!
Also discussion thread is ongoing from April and not last 4 days. If enough
people think it is rushed, we can always revote.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:24 PM Joshua McKenzie
wrote:
> That was four days ago, and I
That was four days ago, and I have a newborn at home. Not a lot of time for
people to respond that have other things going on in life. :)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:13 PM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> If you think vote is being forced, why not reply to my email on another
> thread when I said we should
If you think vote is being forced, why not reply to my email on another
thread when I said we should vote? Why was the thread dead for months and
someone comes back with a contribution and then people starts talking?
I would have happily waited for few more days!!
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:09 P
>
> It is important we make progress as we have been discussing this since
> April!!
The discussion was making progress. Just because you want things to happen
faster is no reason to force an early vote.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:04 PM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> Also my vote is same as Jeff. d bu
I agree that it's premature to pick an option here.
For the record, my bias would be towards option (a) because my experience
is that it's much more productive to start with something that works and
extend it, than try to build a combination of different ideas. Especially
if the latter tends towar
Also my vote is same as Jeff. d but would slightly prefer b. It is
important we make progress as we have been discussing this since April!!
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:52 PM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> The last email on the thread was 3 days ago and I made it clear days back
> that we should vote on it
The last email on the thread was 3 days ago and I made it clear days back
that we should vote on it to make progress. Without this vote, I am not
sure we will make progress.
Many people want to contribute on this and hence we are voting so we can
make progress.
My vote is d
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018
This voting process feels a bit rushed and frankly not well thought out.
In addition to Sylvain's valid points, which you (Sankalp) didn't address
at all, the discussion in the other threads seemed to be ongoing. The last
email you wrote on one of them was asking for additional feedback, that
indi
Hi Sylvain,
I would appreciate if we can give feedback on the
discussion threads and not wait for vote threads. I made it clear in the
discussion thread that we will start a vote!!
Thanks,
Sankalp
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:47 PM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:41
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:41 PM Sylvain Lebresne
wrote:
> That's probably a stupid question, and excuse me if it is, but what does
> those votes on the dev mailing list even mean?
>
> How do you count votes at the end? Just by counting all votes cast,
> irregardless of whomever cast it? Or are w
That's probably a stupid question, and excuse me if it is, but what does
those votes on the dev mailing list even mean?
How do you count votes at the end? Just by counting all votes cast,
irregardless of whomever cast it? Or are we intending to only count PMC
members, or maybe committers votes?
If
d - good with either option, but would probably slightly prefer b, as it
can be build towards the design doc.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:19 AM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> Hi,
> Community has been discussing about Apache Cassandra Management process
> since April and we had lot of discussion abou
+1 for piecemeal (option b).
I think I've explained my opinion on all the various threads and tickets.
-Joey
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:48 AM Vinay Chella wrote:
>
> +1 for option b, considering the advantages mentioned in dev email thread
> that Sankalp linked.
>
> ~Vinay
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12,
+1 for option b, considering the advantages mentioned in dev email thread
that Sankalp linked.
~Vinay
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:36 AM Dinesh Joshi
wrote:
> +1 for piecemeal (option b)
>
> Dinesh
>
> > On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:18 AM, sankalp kohli
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >Community has been d
+1 for piecemeal (option b)
Dinesh
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 8:18 AM, sankalp kohli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>Community has been discussing about Apache Cassandra Management process
> since April and we had lot of discussion about which approach to take to
> get started. Several contributors have been in
Option "b".
Thanks,
Sumanth
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM Roopa Tangirala
wrote:
> +1 to b Take the best from existing side cars and make a great side car
> which ships with cassandra
>
>
> *Regards,*
>
> *Roopa Tangirala*
>
> Engineering Manager CDE
>
> *(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
>
>
>
>
>
>
+1 to b Take the best from existing side cars and make a great side car
which ships with cassandra
*Regards,*
*Roopa Tangirala*
Engineering Manager CDE
*(408) 438-3156 - mobile*
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:19 AM sankalp kohli
wrote:
> Hi,
> Community has been discussing about Apache
Hi,
Community has been discussing about Apache Cassandra Management process
since April and we had lot of discussion about which approach to take to
get started. Several contributors have been interested in doing this and we
need to make a decision of which approach to take.
The current approa
28 matches
Mail list logo
