Sure
> On 7 Dec 2022, at 20:47, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>
>> Can we give Marianne and Matt a chance to confirm their performance numbers?
>> I got an indicative message suggesting it looked good, but nothing firm yet.
>
>
>
> I am presuming that will (and must) happen before the new vo
> Can we give Marianne and Matt a chance to confirm their performance
> numbers? I got an indicative message suggesting it looked good, but nothing
> firm yet.
>
I am presuming that will (and must) happen before the new vote closes
(which will be next Monday anyway). I don't see much point in del
Can we give Marianne and Matt a chance to confirm their performance numbers? I
got an indicative message suggesting it looked good, but nothing firm yet.
> On 7 Dec 2022, at 20:37, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has
>> tes
> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has
> tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered
> binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's.
>
This vote failed due to CASSANDRA-18086, which has now been committe
