Re: [DISCUSS] Adding dependency to the Big-Math library from eobermuhlner

Seems well maintained and MIT licensed. +1 from me. > On Nov 28, 2022, at 6:35 PM, Derek Chen-Becker wrote: > > Overall the library appears to be high quality, even going so far as > to have regression tests between versions. I do, however, think that > the long-term maintenance risk needs to b

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding dependency to the Big-Math library from eobermuhlner

Overall the library appears to be high quality, even going so far as to have regression tests between versions. I do, however, think that the long-term maintenance risk needs to be acknowledged here. I think the *absolute* worst case scenario would be corruption or deletion of source and artifacts,

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding dependency to the Big-Math library from eobermuhlner

I'm pleased with the rigor he shows on his explanations of implementation and performance: http://obermuhlner.ch/wordpress/2016/06/02/bigdecimalmath/ Seems like it's probably stable given the infrequency of changes to it and he's still actively merging patches submit by others: https://github.c

[DISCUSS] Adding dependency to the Big-Math library from eobermuhlner

Hi everybody, I wanted to discuss the addition of the Big-Math library( http://eobermuhlner.github.io/big-math/) as a dependency by CASSANDRA-17221 which add support for abs, exp, log, log10, and round Math function. The library was added fo