Re: URGENT: CASSANDRA-14092 causes Data Loss

2018-01-26 Thread horschi
t; enormous--with and without the 15 year short-term patch. > >> > >> And believe me --there are plenty such business use cases where you use > very long TTLs such as 20 yrs for compliance and other reasons. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Anuj > >

Re: URGENT: CASSANDRA-14092 causes Data Loss

2018-01-25 Thread horschi
ue. Someone else's problem by then. > > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Michael Kjellman > > wrote: > > > >> why are people inserting data with a 15+ year TTL? sorta curious about > the > >> actual use case for that. > >> > >>

Re: URGENT: CASSANDRA-14092 causes Data Loss

2018-01-25 Thread horschi
The assertion was working fine until yesterday 03:14 UTC. The long term solution would be to work with a long instead of a int. The serialized seems to be a variable-int already, so that should be fine already. If you change the assertion to 15 years, then applications might fail, as they might b

Re: Low compactionthroughput blocks reads?

2016-03-03 Thread horschi
Thanks. That's good to know. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > Yep, definitely a bug. Introduced by CASSANDRA-9240 (me; mea culpa). > > I've filed a JIRA for you: CASSANDRA-11301 > > On 3 March 2016 at 14:10, horschi wrote: > > >

Re: Low compactionthroughput blocks reads?

2016-03-03 Thread horschi
gards, Christian On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:31 PM, horschi wrote: > Hi, > > we just had such an incident again, and this time we were able to grab a > jstack-threaddump. > > One thread from this stackdump actually shows a ReadVerbHandler calling > the RateLimiter. From my unders

Re: Low compactionthroughput blocks reads?

2016-03-03 Thread horschi
event happen > more often and more articulated but I think that it's just affected by the > same underlying problem. > > Interestingly we had a similar issue in another cluster last night, which > runs C* 2.1.13 and does NOT yet use incremental repair (just full repair > with -

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.10

2014-08-11 Thread horschi
Saw it. Thanks! On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > On 08/11/2014 04:21 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > >> On 08/11/2014 09:50 AM, horschi wrote: >> >>> Would it be possible to have CASSANDRA-7511 reviewed also? >>> >> >> That

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.10

2014-08-11 Thread horschi
Would it be possible to have CASSANDRA-7511 reviewed also? On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > Ok, ok, closing this vote for now. We'll re-roll as soon as the pig stuff > are fixed. > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jeremiah D Jordan > wrote: > > > I'm -1 on this un