Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.2.0-rc1

Two tickets that warrant attention: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9557 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9558 On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Jason Brown wrote: > +1 > On Friday, June 5, 2015, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:41

Re: Staging Branches

> In the meantime can we agree on having cassci to validate personal merged branches before pushing either, in case of non-trunk patches? +100 from me, but why the exception for trunk? Wouldn't it be easier to wait for the dev branch tests to pass and then do all the merging at once (2.0, 2.1,3.0,

Re: Requiring Java 8 for C* 3.0

+1, from a testing perspective we run dtest and unit tests on hotspot 8 and openjdk 8 and have seen no problems. On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > We discussed requiring Java 8 previously and decided to remain Java > 7-compatible, but at the time we were planning to releas

Re: Staging Branches

I'm not sure how I feel about this, on the one hand cleaner trunk is good, on the other, added complexity leaves more room for error. I'm +0 currently. > We still have missing pieces of infrastructure, and TE is busy with what’s already back-logged. So let’s revisit this proposal in a few months,

A proposal for how we use JIRA in the tick-tock release process

ttp://www.datastax.com/> Ryan McGuire Software Engineering Manager in Test | r...@datastax.com [image: linkedin.png] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/enigmacurry> [image: twitter.png] <http://twitter.com/enigmacurry> <http://github.com/enigmacurry>

Re: 3.0 and the Cassandra release process

I'm taking notes from the infrastructure doc and wrote down some action items for my team: https://gist.github.com/EnigmaCurry/d53eccb55f5d0986c976 -- [image: datastax_logo.png] <http://www.datastax.com/> Ryan McGuire Software Engineering Manager in Test | r...@datastax.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.12

dtests looks good except for CASSANDRA-7281 , but looks like that got pushed up to 2.0.13. On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.0.12. > > sha1: df1f5ead0950d4d3058cf6fe0fcae9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.1.0-rc5

+1 On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > +1 > > On Saturday, August 2, 2014, Sylvain Lebresne > wrote: > > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.1.0-rc5. Unless > someone > > strongly > > object, we'll keep the vote period for this one to 24h. > > > > sha1: cfb3

Re: CQL unit tests vs dtests

We actually have some jython tests for a few test suites we wanted to use the java driver with: https://github.com/riptano/cassandra-dtest-jython On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > Jython! :D > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Benedict Elliott Smith < > belliottsm...@da

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.7

I'd like to see some dev response to my notes on CASSANDRA-6525, but other than that dtests for 2.0 look good. On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote: > Can I push new release of the thrift-server before we roll 2.0.7? > > >

Re: cassandra-2.1 testing

Thanks Mikhail, I remember I fixed this in ccm, but then I forgot that cqlsh_tests wasn't using the ccm api for invoking that. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Mikhail Stepura wrote: > I suspect cqlsh-related tests a

Re: Compaction Progress Greater than 100%

Looks like the same bug to me, whether it's caused by the same thing as it was originally doesn't really matter. Can you add your steps to reproduce it there? I'll reopen the bug for you. Thanks for the bug report! On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Ji Cheng wrote: > Hi, > > I found the compact

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-6746) Reads have a slow ramp up in speed

32G nodes. I'm not mucking with heap settings so it's using -Xms8023M -Xmx8023M -Xmn1600M

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.1 (strike 2)

I retract my -1 (for now, I can't reproduce CASSANDRA-6074.) Sorry for the noise. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Ryan McGuire wrote: > Unfortunately, -1 from me. > > See CASSANDRA-6074 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6074> > > > On Fri, Se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.1 (strike 2)

Unfortunately, -1 from me. See CASSANDRA-6074 On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote: > +1 > > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Sylvain Lebresne

Re: Apache Cassandra 2.0.0 rc1

I've seen similar slowdowns in 2.0 - roughly the same 15%. For instance, http://i.imgur.com/Qi6oo62.png That's a comparison of 1.2.6 to 2.0beta1. Ignore the lines that say speculative_retry=95percentile and ALWAYS. Default 1.2 beats Default 2.0 in overall operation time. Bisecting the cause of t