Congratulations Caleb!
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025, 19:11 Doug Rohrer, wrote:
> Congrats Caleb!
>
> On Feb 26, 2025, at 10:14 PM, Jordan West wrote:
>
> Congrats Caleb!!
>
> Jordan
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 13:01 Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>> .
>>
>>>
>>> Please join us in welcoming Caleb to his new r
Definitely +1 on this. We saw in the early days of SAI development that
stream pipelines had a substantial impact on performance.
On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 19:28, Caleb Rackliffe
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:29 AM Benedict wrote:
>
>> Since it’s related to the logging discussion we’r
Congrats Maxim!!
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024, 10:41 Andrés de la Peña, wrote:
> Congrats, Maxim!
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 03:45, guo Maxwell wrote:
>
>> Congratulations, Maxim!
>>
>> Francisco Guerrero 于2024年1月9日周二 09:00写道：
>>
>>> Congratulations, Maxim! Well deserved!
>>>
>>> On 2024/01/08 18:19:04 J
“range reads” for the client level metrics, not
>>>> regular reads. So grouping them into the regular read metrics at the lower
>>>> level seems confusing to me in that sense as well.
>>>>
>>>> As an operator I want to know how my SAI re
2. We leave the exclude the SAI reads from the current global count so
total reads = global count + SAI count
Our preference is for option 1 above. Does anyone have any strong views /
opinions on this?
--
[image: DataStax Logo Square] <https://www.datastax.com/> *Mike Adamson*
Engineering
atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17789202
>
> Furthermore, we don't even know if it's still an issue after 19034 was
> committed. We want to figure this out before the vote window closes.
>
>
>
>
>
--
[image: DataStax Logo S
> For my understanding, isn’t it gonna be an issue to be copyrighted also
to a single person? For the same reasons?
This was partly why I asked. I did a random check of libraries that are
definite dependencies (netty, guava) and both contain author copyrights.
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023, 16:01 Ekaterin
ent on, even if only the
> optics of it are problematic.
>
> So long we're asked the question, and this is just an add-on feature that
> the codebase is not dependent on, and no one has any objections then I'm
> ok with it.
>
--
[image: DataStax Logo Square] <https://w
tps://www.datastax.com/> *Mike Adamson*
Engineering
+1 650 389 6000 <16503896000> | datastax.com <https://www.datastax.com/>
Find DataStax Online: [image: LinkedIn Logo]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_datastax&d=DwMFaQ&a
; re-confirming reading
>>> https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a ):
>>>
>>>
>> We should probably get clarification here regardless, iirc this came up
>> when we were considering SpotBugs too.
>>
>>
--
[image: DataStax Logo Sq
tps://www.datastax.com/> *Mike Adamson*
Engineering
+1 650 389 6000 <16503896000> | datastax.com <https://www.datastax.com/>
Find DataStax Online: [image: LinkedIn Logo]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company_datastax&d=DwMFaQ&a
; In particular, we need to nail down the syntax for doing non-exact
> > > string
> > > >>>> matches. We have a proof of concept that includes full Lucene
> > > analyzer and
> > > >>>> filter functionality – just the text transformation pieces, none
>
- the checks would be run automatically only once
>- they would be triggered even for those devs who do everything in IDE
>and do not even touch Ant commands directly
>
>
> Checks can take time; to optimize that, they could be enforced locally to
> verify onl
://github.com/datastax/cassandra/tree/cep-vsearch
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Ellis
>>> co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
>>> @spyced
>>>
>>> --
>> you are the apple of my eye !
>>
>>
>>
--
[image: DataStax Logo
efault of 2i.
>
> I agree that the default cannot change in 5.0, but our existing default of
> 2i can be commented out.
>
> For the user this gives them the same feedback, and puts the same
> requirement to edit one line of yaml, as when we disabled MVs and SASI in
> 4.0
> No one h
perator
> >
> > Piotr Kołaczkowski
> > e. pkola...@datastax.com
> > w. www.datastax.com
>
>
--
[image: DataStax Logo Square] <https://www.datastax.com/> *Mike Adamson*
Engineering
+1 650 389 6000 <16503896000> | datastax.com <https://www.datastax.com/>
SE' and
>>>>> 'SPARSE'
>>>>>
>>>>> Pinecone[1] - dense_vector, sparse_vector
>>>>> Elastic[2]: dense_vector
>>>>> Milvus[3]: float_vector, binary_vector
>>>>> pgvector[4]: vector
>&
e to make it look
>>>> like a list, so VECTOR as here the word VECTOR is clearly not
>>>> redundant.
>>>>
>>>> So, I vote:
>>>>
>>>> 1) (NON NULL) FLOAT[N]
>>>> 2) FLOAT[N] (Non null by default)
>>>>
ood API design to have the field define the index you
> create - only to shape what is permitted.
>
> A HNSW index is very specific and should be asked for specifically, not
> implicitly, IMO.
>
> On 4 May 2023, at 11:47, Mike Adamson wrote:
>
>
>
>> For syntax,
where the VECTOR
> keyword is: for general cql users; just meaning "non-null and frozen",
> these gel best together.
>
> Options (5) and (6) are for those that feel we can and should provide this
> type without introducing the vector keyword.
>
>
>
&
u can label this off-topic if you like, but I value our discuss
> threads being collaborative in an open-mode. Sometimes the best idea is on
> the tail end of a sequence of bad and/or unpopular ideas.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
[image: DataStax Logo Square] <https://www.datastax.co
s use DATABASE as the container
name for a group of tables so it would make sense for Cassandra to adopt
this naming as well.
KEYSPACE would be kept in the grammar but we would update some logging and
documentation to encourage use of the new name.
Mike Adamson
--
[image: DataStax Logo Square] &
Sorry, I realised that I hadn't included any completion date for CEP-7. At
the current time we are looking at completion mid to end of April.
Mike
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 11:34, Mike Adamson wrote:
> CEP-7 Storage Attached Index is in review with ~430 files and ~70k LOC.
> The
se underlying reasons and check how
>>> they apply than to pick a mechanism and stick to it too closely.
>>>
>>> The last release was quite recent, so we aren’t at risk of slow releases
>>> here. Similarly, there are some features that the *project* would probab
I have had a look at whether we could use the QuickTheories in our
randomized testing and come to the following conclusions:
Pros:
1) It has a very rich set of random generators out of the box.
2) It has a very powerful mechanism for generating customised randomized
datasets.
3) It is very pluggab
in the 18058 branch <https://github.com/maedhroz/cassandra/pull/6>, it's
> pretty compact w/ Carrot's RandomizedTest in use, but I suppose it could
> also use IntegersDSL from QT...
>
> (Not that it matters, but just for reference, we do use
> com.carrotsearch.hppc al
41, David Capwell wrote:
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.randomizedtesting-runner 2.1.2 - test
> dependency
>
>
> Can you talk more about why? There are several ways to do random testing
> in-tree ATM, so wondering why we need another one
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2022, at
any concerns about these changes?
Mike Adamson
was just wondering what state it
> was in, given I didn’t see it mentioned in the CEP.
>
>> On Feb 14, 2022, at 8:12 AM, Mike Adamson wrote:
>>
>> > We don't need a whole "codec framework" for V1, but we're still embedding
>> some versio
> secondary indexing.
>
> tl;dr I'm +1 on bringing this to a vote and starting to put together all the
> pieces for CASSANDRA-16052
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16052> :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:26 AM Mike Adamson <mailto:madam...@datastax.com
> I'd be interested to hear from Mike/Jason on the OR support topic, of course.
The support for OR within SAI is fairly minimal and will not work without the
non-SAI changes needed. Since the non-SAI OR changes are extensive it would be
better to bring those in under their own CEP.
I’d leave t
I can’t why there would be any objection to adding a guardrail. I think this is
a good idea.
MikeA
"I see this as a task for a follow-up ticket so long as the CEP’s contributors
would not oppose the addition of such a guardrail."
> On 3 Feb 2022, at 16:06, C. Scott Andreas wrote:
>
> I see t
19:49, DuyHai Doan wrote:
>
> Good new Mike that row based indexing will be available, this was a major
> lacking from SASI at that time !
>
> Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:38, Mike Adamson <mailto:madam...@datastax.com>> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
Hi,
Just to keep this thread up to date with development progress, we will be
adding row-aware support to SAI in the next few weeks. This is currently going
through the final stages of review and testing.
This feature also adds on-disk versioning to SAI. This allows SAI to support
multiple on
source/_util
>
> Thanks, Lorina
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
>
>
--
Mike Adamson
e. madam...@datastax.com
w. www.datastax.com
I've honestly no idea but it is still defaulting to false in Config.java.
I'm assuming it will change to defaulting to true when thrift is finally
removed.
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 at 15:34 Tomas Repik wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
>
> now I remember this option, but I thought it was set to true by default.
Hi Tomas,
Try adding:
start_native_transport: true
to your config.
Cheers,
MikeA
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 at 15:08 Tomas Repik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to create a minimal config file that is needed to start
> Cassandra server. Is it even possible?
> What is the minimal set of options that
Do you have the JCE unlimited strength policy files installed in you JDK?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce8-download-2133166.html
On Tue, 17 May 2016 at 22:58 Mahdi Mohammadi wrote:
> I can successfully compile cassandra source using `ant` command but when
> running `
38 matches
Mail list logo
