Re: Review of Cassandra actions

2016-11-06 Thread Mark Struberg
Benedict, you ride the 'bla said blub', bääh.. since at least 5 replies. Yes the discussion was heated on both sides. But Chris didn't say anything since many posts. And his reply was sharp but really not totally personal. Can we now come back to a more technical discussion again please? Some

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
ght for the overseers. > > > >I reiterate again that all discussions and actions undertaken should be made >public. This community has just been charged with judging if the board acted >appropriately. You have not. We cannot make that judgement without the facts. > > > > &g

Re: Moderation

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Russel, I don't read that out of Chris' answer. He just tried to show how community development might look like if done a bit more openly. Do you mind going back to Chris' original reply and re-read it again? I've not interpreted it as anyone trying to make you look bad. Au contraire! txs and L

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

2016-11-05 Thread Mark Struberg
Having a bit insight how the board operates (being PMC-chair for 2 other TLPs) I can ensure you that the board did handle this very cleanly! A few things really should FIRST get handled in private. This is the same regardless whether it's about board oversight or you as a PMC. An example is e.