Benedict, you ride the 'bla said blub', bääh.. since at least 5 replies.
Yes the discussion was heated on both sides. But Chris didn't say anything
since many posts. And his reply was sharp but really not totally personal. Can
we now come back to a more technical discussion again please?
Some
ght for the overseers.
>
>
>
>I reiterate again that all discussions and actions undertaken should be made
>public. This community has just been charged with judging if the board acted
>appropriately. You have not. We cannot make that judgement without the facts.
>
>
>
>
&g
Russel, I don't read that out of Chris' answer.
He just tried to show how community development might look like if done a bit
more openly.
Do you mind going back to Chris' original reply and re-read it again?
I've not interpreted it as anyone trying to make you look bad. Au contraire!
txs and L
Having a bit insight how the board operates (being PMC-chair for 2 other TLPs)
I can ensure you that the board did handle this very cleanly!
A few things really should FIRST get handled in private. This is the same
regardless whether it's about board oversight or you as a PMC.
An example is e.