+1.
Cassandra has matured a lot lately and more users are relying heavily on it in
production. For those users, including us, stability and predictability becomes
very important.
Not including new and potentially unstable features in maintenance releases is
an easy way to decrease risk at a lo
Thanks Jonathan!
We'll work on adding some more docs to that wiki (probably after the holidays).
/Johan
On 21 dec 2010, at 18.12, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Thanks to Kelvin, Johan, Ryan, Sylvain, Chris, and everyone else for their
> hard work on this!
>
> For mere mortals: http://wiki.apache.org
Jonathan,
Thanks for the email, much appreciated. I’ll be the first to admit that Kelvin
and I have made our share of mistakes along the way. In particular, we could
have worked harder to clearly explain and document our approach to counters.
In order to move this forward we are going to have a
t; On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Johan Oskarsson wrote:
>> The consensus in this thread seems to be moving towards the following todos
>> in order to get 1072 into trunk.
>>
>> * create separate api methods for increments
>> * mark functionality as experimental
&g
The consensus in this thread seems to be moving towards the following todos in
order to get 1072 into trunk.
* create separate api methods for increments
* mark functionality as experimental
* further code cleanup (please comment on jira with specific suggestions)
Is this a reasonable summary? W
In the last few months Digg and Twitter have been using a counter patch that
lets Cassandra act as a high-volume realtime counting system. Atomic counters
enable new applications that were previously difficult to implement at scale,
including realtime analytics and large-scale systems monitoring
Hi all,
There's an interesting paper published where the authors describe a project for
failure testing in distributed systems. As an example the show how they could
find issues in Hadoop HDFS. They also mention they are working on similar tests
for Cassandra. Worth a read. Hopefully they will
to plot web page response
> times, and it served its purpose great.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Johan Oskarsson wrote:
>> I've started looking into how this issue. My current thinking are as follows.
>>
>> Add support for Cassandra in Whirr:
I've started looking into how this issue. My current thinking are as follows.
Add support for Cassandra in Whirr:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrProposal
This would allow us to start a short lived Cassandra cluster on one of the
cloud services (EC2/Rackspace etc) for testing.
Real hardwar
+0.
My only concern is the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-866
issue.
I understand it's important to get this release out though, so won't block.
/Johan
On 12 apr 2010, at 03.55, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> iss
Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
During the 0.6 cycle Ivy was introduced to manage (most of) our
dependencies, and where possible, jars were removed from svn and no
longer included in binary release artifacts. Recently though this change
has been called into
11 matches
Mail list logo
