Re: State Of: CQL

2011-03-20 Thread Daniel Lundin
Conservatively and true to the initial name: CassQL => Cassandra Query Language A bit more left-field: CQ => Cassandra Query CL => Cassandra Language I'm partial to CQ myself, as it: * Suggests a verb - "seek". * Has geeky secondary [but highly relevant] meaning: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Re: Time for 1.0

2011-01-13 Thread Daniel Lundin
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > I'd rather drop the leading the 0 and continue to number releases > sequentially the way we have.  If our < 1 versioning is signaling a lack > of readiness, and if >= 1 is a necessary gate, then 8.0 should work > equally as well.  Better in fact

Re: Reducing confusion around client libraries

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Lundin
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Daniel Lundin wrote: > ... for each language/library would work (like the mongodb "language > centers", but with .. .. but with fewer levels of hierarchy, perhaps. /d

Re: Reducing confusion around client libraries

2010-12-03 Thread Daniel Lundin
I think one issue is a lack of liveness on the web end of the project itself. The project web site doesn't feel like the natural focal point it ought to be, and client confusion might (in part) be an artifact of that. The mongodb wiki works alright without much effort because it has a clear struct