I'm going to agree with Eric on this one. Twitter has wanted some sort of vnode
support for quite sometime. We even were willing to do all the work. I have
reservations about that now We have been silent due to the community and how
this is more like an exclusive Datastax project than an Apache
+1
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> The 1.1.0 freeze has been going on for more than 2 weeks now, with not that
> many big issues so far. I think it is time to release a (first) beta to
> hopefully get some wider testing. Note that we still have a few tickets
> opened
>
+1
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> It's been close to 2 months since 0.8.9 and while things are mostly calm on
> the 0.8 branch, we do have a few fixes in there that is worth releasing.
> I thus propose the following artifacts for release as 0.8.10.
>
> Git sha1: 038b8f
+1
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
> > So, 1.0.3 was not as solid as one would have hoped and CASSANDRA-3510 is
> > fairly bad. We've also fixed a few concurrency bugs and more, so it is
> worth
> > push
+1
-Chris
On May 30, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> OK, let's try this yet again; I propose the following artifacts for release
> as 0.8.0 (final).
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8.0@r1129278
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/cont
+1
-Chris
On Apr 19, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Let's try this again. I propose the following artifacts for release as
> 0.8.0 beta1.
>
> You will note the addition of three new artifacts, cql-1.0.0.tar.gz,
> txcql-1.0.0.tar.gz and apache-cassandra-cql-1.0.0.jar. These are
> lan
We no longer backport to 0.7. We're on 0.8/trunk at the moment.
-Chris
On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>> I was wondering if this (and supporting patches?) could be easily applied to
>> 0.74, or if the current trunk is stabl
uot; to "all of the data gets streamed." A node
> that claims a token that is in the ring is assumed to actually have
> that data and IMO trying to guess when to break that would be
> error-prone -- better to have some explicit signal.
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ch
I was looking over the Operations wiki, and with the many improvements with
0.7, I wanted to bring up a thought.
The two options today for replacing a node that has lost all data is:
(Recommended approach) Bring up the replacement node with a new IP address, and
AutoBootstrap set to true in st
+1
-Chris
On Jan 22, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> doh!
>
> +1.
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:40, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> We should probably get the fix for CASSANDRA-1959 out to users of 0.6.
>> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.6.10.
>>
>> SVN:
>> https://svn.
+1
-Chris
On Nov 11, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> A regression caused by CASSANDRA-1622[1] (and fixed in CASSANDRA-1727[2])
> made its way into the last release. With that fixed now (along with an
> 11th hour backport of CASSANDRA-1722[3]), I propose the following
> artifacts for 0.6
+1
-Chris
On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
> http://riptano.com
+1
-Chris
On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Stu Hood wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Eric Evans"
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:55am
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] 0.7.0 beta3
>
>
> The RC1 vote[1] was vetoed due to, (among other things), the desire to
+1
-Chris
On Sep 28, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
It feels like 0.7.0-beta1 is becoming too distant a spec in
the rear-view, and the delta[1] is becoming quite large. I
propose we vote to release a new beta
I can chime in on that part Joe. The counters weren't the reasons for launch
issues. It was just actually the volume of messages we were trying to handle in
the cluster, so it didn't matter if it was reads for counts or reads to normal
CFs, we just had more on the count side.
It is very unfortu
+1
-Chris
On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> As discussed last week, here is the proposed 0.6.4 release. There's
>> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.3, so be sure to review
>> carefully and raise any
+1. Digg has been holding off until at least beta before testing. I'd love to
start this as soon as possible.
-Chris
On Jul 24, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> At the time of our last update [1], I estimated it would be 4 to 6
> weeks until a 0.7 beta. That was over 8 weeks ago. Alt
+1
-Chris
On Jun 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> As promised last week, here is the proposed 0.6.3 release. There have
>> been a fair number of changes[1] since 0.6.2, so please look it over
>> carefully and speak up i
+1
-Chris
On May 25, 2010, at 10:25 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>>
>> As promised, here is the 0.6.2 vote.
>>
>> The list of changes from 0.6.1 is longer than I'd have liked, so it
>> would be great if everyone can give this one an ex
+1
-Chris
On Apr 11, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> It's been about a week and half since rc1 and there aren't any serious
> issues so I propose we release. The tag and artifacts below should
> differ from rc1 only in that the versioning was updated.
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.
+1
-Chris
On Mar 28, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> The 0.6.0 blockers are now out of the way and things are looking good. I
> propose the following tag/artifacts for 0.6.0-rc1:
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/tags/cassandra-0.6.0-rc1
> 0.6.0-rc1 artifacts: h
to increase usability. The rationale for (2) through (5a) is that
> there is no value in having two channels unless some distinction is
> enforced.
>
> Comments? Questions?
>
> --
> Eric Evans
> eev...@rackspace.com
>
>
--
Chris Goffinet
ndra-0.6.0-beta3/CHANGES.txt
> > [2]:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310865&fixfor=12314361
> >
> > --
> > Eric Evans
> > eev...@rackspace.com
> >
> >
>
--
Chris Goffinet
23 matches
Mail list logo
