Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 2.0.8

2014-05-06 Thread Blair Zajac
In NEWS.txt the second 2.0.8 should be an earlier version. 2.0.8 = ... Upgrading - - Nothing specific to this release, but please see 2.0.8 if you are upgrading from a previous version. Blair On May 6, 2014, at 2:12 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > Since a fair amount of b

Re: C* engine

2013-12-19 Thread Blair Zajac
On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Andy Cobley wrote: > The question just as easily be asked, why not rewrite it in Erlang ? > Probably lots of advantages to be gained there, the ability to upgrade on the > fly, native message passing, functional programming paradigm ? You could switch from Jav

Re: cassandra-2.0.0: both a tag and a branch name

2013-09-04 Thread Blair Zajac
On 09/04/2013 12:08 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: I would venture that either your local copy or whatever your 'origin' points to is not up to date. There was a cassandra-2.0.0 prior to the final 2.0 release and it was both a tag and a branch name for about 10 minutes but the branch has been remove

cassandra-2.0.0: both a tag and a branch name

2013-09-03 Thread Blair Zajac
$ git branch -a | grep cassandra-2.0.0 * cassandra-2.0.0 remotes/origin/cassandra-2.0.0 $ git tag -l | grep cassandra-2.0.0cassandra-2.0.0 cassandra-2.0.0-beta1 cassandra-2.0.0-beta2 cassandra-2.0.0-rc1 cassandra-2.0.0-rc2 $ git checkout cassandra-2.0.0 warning: refname 'cassandra-2.0.0' is am

Re: CAS UPDATE: save round trip by returning column values

2013-06-06 Thread Blair Zajac
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5619 Blair On 06/05/2013 12:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me a priori. Would you mind opening a JIRA ticket for that so it doesn't fell through the cracks?

CAS UPDATE: save round trip by returning column values

2013-06-01 Thread Blair Zajac
Hello, Looking at the new CAS CQL3 support examples [1], if one lost a race for an UPDATE, to save a round trip to get the current values, could the columns that were used in the IF clause also be returned to the caller? Maybe the columns values as part of the SET part could also be returned.