Re: A Roadmap to Cassandra Analytics 1.0

Hi Doug, I would love to help you with some of that. Spark 4.0 support seems appealing to me. Let me check with my "backend" if there is any capacity doing so and connecting privately to hash out the details. Regards On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 7:53 PM Doug Rohrer wrote: > Hello folks, > > As many

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

I'm unclear if Josh/Ekaterina/Benedict's statements are part of the vote amending our project governance. If consensus is required for breaking changes with a strong preference for not breaking I am +1, but the original text of Josh's proposal is merely "We use a deprecate-then-remove strategy for

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Konstantinov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 16:37, Caleb Rackliffe > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova < >> e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I also remember we agreed on Discuss thread for re

Re: A Roadmap to Cassandra Analytics 1.0

Is the current roadmap published somewhere? I went to Confluence and couldn't find anything. Patrick On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:53 AM Doug Rohrer wrote: > Hello folks, > > As many of you on the ASF Slack may have noticed, I’ve been creating a > bunch of new tickets for the Cassandra Analytics p

Re: A Roadmap to Cassandra Analytics 1.0

Thanks Doug!! Supporting vnodes is huge and I'm excited to see it being worked on. My experience has been most environments are using them, and single token clusters are outliers. Usually run by folks who have been part of the project for a long time, and often committers. I'm looking forward t

A Roadmap to Cassandra Analytics 1.0

Hello folks, As many of you on the ASF Slack may have noticed, I’ve been creating a bunch of new tickets for the Cassandra Analytics project related to a 1.0 release. Since it was initially contributed, there have been many enhancements and fixes to the library, but there are still some gaps th

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 16:37, Caleb Rackliffe wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I also remember we agreed on Discuss thread for removing anything plus >> preference for backward compatibility wherever it is possible. >> >> On Tue, 22 A

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:37 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > +1 > > I also remember we agreed on Discuss thread for removing anything plus > preference for backward compatibility wherever it is possible. > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 7:00, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: > >> +1 >> >> > On 17 Apr 2025,

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 I also remember we agreed on Discuss thread for removing anything plus preference for backward compatibility wherever it is possible. On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 7:00, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: > +1 > > > On 17 Apr 2025, at 16:58, Josh McKenzie wrote: > > > > [DISCUSS] thread: > https://lists.apach

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 > On 17 Apr 2025, at 16:58, Josh McKenzie wrote: > > [DISCUSS] thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy6vodbkh64plhdfwqz3l3364gsmh2lq > > The proposed new versioning mechanism: > • We no longer use semver .MINOR > • Online upgrades are supported for all GA supported releases at

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 > On 22 Apr 2025, at 10:33, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > > +1 > -- > Sylvain > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:47 AM Maxim Muzafarov > wrote: >> Also +1 >> >> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 07:57, guo Maxwell > > wrote: >> >> >> >> We have alread

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

+1 -- Sylvain On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:47 AM Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > Also +1 > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 07:57, guo Maxwell wrote: > >> > >> We have already agreed some time ago that any incompatible API change > requires a DISCUSS thread. I’m fairly sure it’s documented on the wiki. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Simplifying our release versioning process

Also +1 On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 07:57, guo Maxwell wrote: >> >> We have already agreed some time ago that any incompatible API change >> requires a DISCUSS thread. I’m fairly sure it’s documented on the wiki. > > > Yes, I remembered that we already have a thread to reach consensus on this. > > +1