Re: Project hygiene on old PRs

Thanks Josh and Stefan for the comments! Such a script can definitely be helpful for this purpose of keeping our house tidy. It seems that the thread hasn’t gotten much steam yet. As this is, by no means, any urgent matter, let’s give some more time for people to pitch in. I’ll wait some more d

Re: Merging compaction improvements to 5.0

Hi Folks, A bit delayed but I have the backport for 20092 ready. The branch can be found here: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/cassandra-5.0...jrwest:cassandra:jwest/20092-5.0-backport. I've run tests and all looked good. I plan to do one more run post a recent rebase. Links are in CAS

Re: Constraint's "not null" alignment with transactions and their simplification

On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 9:24 AM Patrick McFadin wrote: > I'm loving all the syntax discussion lately. It's a good debate and > essential for the project's future with a good developer experience. > +1 > On NULL. I've been asked this a million times by end users. Why is there > no "NOT NULL" in

Re: Constraint's "not null" alignment with transactions and their simplification

I'm loving all the syntax discussion lately. It's a good debate and essential for the project's future with a good developer experience. On NULL. I've been asked this a million times by end users. Why is there no "NOT NULL" in the schema? I'm in favor of the standard SQL syntax here because it's

Re: [DISCUSS] 5.1 should be 6.0

+1 to 6.0 On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 8:22 AM Josh McKenzie wrote: > David makes a good point about making sure that we support 4.x to 6.0 > upgrades. > > Supporting live upgrades from every GA supported version > today seems obvious as a > lazy consens