I feel like a group of us discussed this IRL a bit at ApacheCon in Vegas ~
2019 maybe? Anyhoo, the tidbit sticking in my mind was someone explaining
the string operations overhead in the JVM of log concatenation vs slapping
binary to CQ’s off heap-and-append operation was substantial.
We could hos
> When it comes to alternatives, what about logback + slf4j? It has
> appenders where we want, it is sync / async, we can code some nio appender
> too I guess, it logs it as text into a file so we do not need any special
> tooling to review that. For tailing which Chronicle also offers, I guess
> "
The test builds of Cassandra 4.0.14, 4.1.7 and 5.0.1, are available.
A vote of this test build will be initiated within the next couple of days.
== 4.0.14 ==
sha1: 7bf67349579411521bcdee4febd209cff63179a6
Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.0.14-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repo
Do you have any new updates on this DISCUSS ?
- The reason this pattern is popular is it allows extension of
functionality ahead of the database. Some people copy to a NAS/SAN. Some
people copy to S3. Some people copy to their own object storage that isn’t
s3 compatible. “Compress and move” is su
Is there any update on this topic? It seems that things can make a big
progress if Jake Luciani can find someone who can make the
FileSystemProvider code accessible.
Jon Haddad 于2023年12月16日周六 05:29写道：
> At a high level I really like the idea of being able to better leverage
> cheaper storage
